Two-Stage, In Silico Deconvolution of the Lymphocyte Compartment of the Peripheral Whole Blood Transcriptome in the Context of Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection

Acute rejection is a major complication of solid organ transplantation that prevents the long-term assimilation of the allograft. Various populations of lymphocytes are principal mediators of this process, infiltrating graft tissues and driving cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Understanding the lymphocyte-specific biology associated with rejection is therefore critical. Measuring genome-wide changes in transcript abundance in peripheral whole blood cells can deliver a comprehensive view of the status of the immune system. The heterogeneous nature of the tissue significantly affects the sensitivity and interpretability of traditional analyses, however. Experimental separation of cell types is an obvious solution, but is often impractical and, more worrying, may affect expression, leading to spurious results. Statistical deconvolution of the cell type-specific signal is an attractive alternative, but existing approaches still present some challenges, particularly in a clinical research setting. Obtaining time-matched sample composition to biologically interesting, phenotypically homogeneous cell sub-populations is costly and adds significant complexity to study design. We used a two-stage, in silico deconvolution approach that first predicts sample composition to biologically meaningful and homogeneous leukocyte sub-populations, and then performs cell type-specific differential expression analysis in these same sub-populations, from peripheral whole blood expression data. We applied this approach to a peripheral whole blood expression study of kidney allograft rejection. The patterns of differential composition uncovered are consistent with previous studies carried out using flow cytometry and provide a relevant biological context when interpreting cell type-specific differential expression results. We identified cell type-specific differential expression in a variety of leukocyte sub-populations at the time of rejection. The tissue-specificity of these differentially expressed probe-set lists is consistent with the originating tissue and their functional enrichment consistent with allograft rejection. Finally, we demonstrate that the strategy described here can be used to derive useful hypotheses by validating a cell type-specific ratio in an independent cohort using the nanoString nCounter assay.

[1]  Jean YH Yang,et al.  Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics , 2004, Genome Biology.

[2]  Ting Gong,et al.  DeconRNASeq: a statistical framework for deconvolution of heterogeneous tissue samples based on mRNA-Seq data , 2013, Bioinform..

[3]  B. McManus,et al.  Functional Genomic Analysis of Peripheral Blood During Early Acute Renal Allograft Rejection , 2009, Transplantation.

[4]  H. Shimada,et al.  High preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival in patients with gastric cancer , 2010, Gastric Cancer.

[5]  Ramnik J. Xavier,et al.  Gene enrichment profiles reveal T-cell development, differentiation, and lineage-specific transcription factors including ZBTB25 as a novel NF-AT repressor. , 2010, Blood.

[6]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[7]  Sean R. Davis,et al.  NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  S. Digumarthy,et al.  Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology , 2007, Nature.

[9]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  A Self-Directed Method for Cell-Type Identification and Separation of Gene Expression Microarrays , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  M. Etminan,et al.  Pharmacoepidemiology I: A Review of Pharmacoepidemiologic Study Designs , 2004, Pharmacotherapy.

[11]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[13]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[14]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[15]  Z. Modrušan,et al.  Deconvolution of Blood Microarray Data Identifies Cellular Activation Patterns in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus , 2009, PloS one.

[16]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[17]  H. E. Hansen,et al.  The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. , 1999, Kidney international.

[18]  R. Colvin,et al.  The changing role of natural killer cells in solid organ rejection and tolerance. , 2006, Transplantation.

[19]  Aleksey A. Nakorchevskiy,et al.  Expression deconvolution: A reinterpretation of DNA microarray data reveals dynamic changes in cell populations , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  B. Wood,et al.  Refrigerated storage improves the stability of the complete blood cell count and automated differential. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  M. ChB.,et al.  Neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer , 2005, Journal of surgical oncology.

[22]  Zhandong Liu,et al.  Gene expression deconvolution in linear space , 2011, Nature Methods.

[23]  J. Szustakowski,et al.  Optimal Deconvolution of Transcriptional Profiling Data Using Quadratic Programming with Application to Complex Clinical Blood Samples , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  Ruben H. Zamar,et al.  MDQC: a new quality assessment method for microarrays based on quality control reports , 2007, Bioinform..

[25]  Hongzhen He,et al.  Analysis of differential immune responses induced by innate and adaptive immunity following transplantation , 2003, Immunology.

[26]  Yi Zhong,et al.  Digital sorting of complex tissues for cell type-specific gene expression profiles , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[27]  V. Pascual,et al.  Assessing the human immune system through blood transcriptomics , 2010, BMC Biology.

[28]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Cell type–specific gene expression differences in complex tissues , 2010, Nature Methods.

[30]  C. Son,et al.  Role of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio in the Differential Diagnosis between Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Bacterial Community-Acquired Pneumonia , 2013, Annals of laboratory medicine.

[31]  S. Tebbutt,et al.  Transcriptional Changes of Blood Eosinophils After Methacholine Inhalation Challenge in Asthmatics , 2012, Genomics insights.

[32]  B. Mougin,et al.  Investigation of Variation in Gene Expression Profiling of Human Blood by Extended Principle Component Analysis , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  W. Baldwin,et al.  Platelets Contribute to Allograft Rejection through Glutamate Receptor Signaling , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[34]  B. McManus,et al.  White Blood Cell Differentials Enrich Whole Blood Expression Data in the Context of Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection , 2012, Bioinformatics and biology insights.

[35]  B. McManus,et al.  Whole Blood Biomarkers of Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection: Double-Crossing the Biopsy , 2010, Transplantation.

[36]  Giuseppe Remuzzi,et al.  Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation , 2004, The Lancet.

[37]  Rafael A. Irizarry,et al.  Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor , 2005 .

[38]  Gordon K. Smyth,et al.  limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data , 2005 .

[39]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[40]  H. Dressman,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and precision of microarray-based predictors of breast cancer biology and clinical outcome. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  Jason Laramie,et al.  Whole blood and leukocyte RNA isolation for gene expression analyses. , 2004, Physiological genomics.

[42]  Michael Levin,et al.  Detection of Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected and -Uninfected African Adults Using Whole Blood RNA Expression Signatures: A Case-Control Study , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[43]  L. Turka,et al.  The Innate Immune System in Allograft Rejection and Tolerance1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[44]  R. Shapiro,et al.  Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: A Review , 2012, Journal of transplantation.

[45]  Graham M Lord,et al.  Development of a cross-platform biomarker signature to detect renal transplant tolerance in humans. , 2010, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[46]  S. Alexander,et al.  Rejection of the kidney allograft. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  S. Jang,et al.  Flow cytometric detection of neutrophil-associated immunoglobulin in patients with or without neutropenia and establishment of the reference interval. , 2011, Annals of clinical and laboratory science.

[48]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Comparison of different isolation techniques prior gene expression profiling of blood derived cells: impact on physiological responses, on overall expression and the role of different cell types , 2004, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[49]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Automated blood cell counts: state of the art. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[50]  Klaus Obermayer,et al.  A new summarization method for affymetrix probe level data , 2006, Bioinform..