Optimal reference sensor positions using output-only vibration test data

Abstract In the context of finite element model updating, experimentally obtained features are used to improve the quality of an initial finite element model. Using vibration tests, features like natural frequency, mode shapes, and modal damping ratios can be extracted from measured data. One possibility to perform such tests is a roving setup configuration that requires defining the positions of reference sensors to merge the information of all setups. Therefore, the determination of reference sensor positions is very important for reliable results. The presented research is concentrated on the determination of optimal reference sensor positions assuming random excitations within a weakly stationary process. Predicted power spectral amplitudes and an initial finite element model are the basis to define the validation criterion of possible sensor positions. In combination with geometrically based design variables, which define the sensor positions, a genetic algorithm is applied to avoid the assessment of all possible combinations of reference sensor positions. The applicability of the proposed approach is demonstrated on a numerical benchmark study of a simply supported beam and a case study of a real test specimen. Furthermore, the theory of determining the expected power spectral amplitudes is compared with results of vibration tests. It can be concluded that the proposed approach is suitable to determine optimal reference sensor positions as long as the initial finite element model has a sufficient accuracy.

[1]  Hisham Abou-Kandil,et al.  SENSORS LOCATION FOR UPDATING PROBLEMS , 1999 .

[2]  An-Pan Cherng OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT FOR MODAL PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION USING SIGNAL SUBSPACE CORRELATION TECHNIQUES , 1999 .

[3]  Brett Newman,et al.  Optimal Blending Filter Parameters and Sensor Placement for Flight Control , 2002 .

[4]  Helmut Wenzel,et al.  Ambient Vibration Monitoring , 2005 .

[5]  Palle Andersen,et al.  Modal Identification from Ambient Responses using Frequency Domain Decomposition , 2000 .

[6]  Peter Lancaster,et al.  Curve and surface fitting - an introduction , 1986 .

[7]  Wei Liu,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for spatial lattice structure based on genetic algorithms , 2008 .

[8]  Daniele Gallieni,et al.  Genetic-algorithm-based procedure for pretest analysis , 1995 .

[9]  Peter Avitabile,et al.  Modal Test Reference Selection Using an SVD Procedure , 1996 .

[10]  Peter Avitabile,et al.  Selection of measurement references using the trip procedure , 2001 .

[11]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems , 2004 .

[12]  Deirdre R. Meldrum,et al.  Optimal sensor placement of large flexible space structures , 1996 .

[13]  Rongming Lin,et al.  Model updating of damped structures using FRF data , 2006 .

[14]  Eric B. Flynn,et al.  A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing , 2010 .

[15]  Seamus D. Garvey,et al.  Automatic choice of measurement locations for dynamic testing , 1994 .

[16]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Optimal sensor location methodology for structural identification and damage detection. , 2006 .

[17]  Makola M. Abdullah,et al.  Placement of sensors/actuators on civil structures using genetic algorithms , 2001 .

[18]  Fred Y. Hadaegh,et al.  Optimal experiment design for identification of large space structures , 1988, Autom..

[19]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[20]  Herand Bedrossian,et al.  Optimal placement of sensors and actuators for modal identification , 1998 .

[21]  M. Stabb,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm for Optimally Selecting Accelerometer Locations , 1995 .

[22]  S. M. Joshi,et al.  Sensor-Actuator Placement for Flexible Structures with Actuator Dynamics , 1993 .

[23]  Chinchao Liu,et al.  Sensor placement for time-domain modal parameter estimation , 1996 .

[24]  Thomas R. Cole,et al.  An Automated Method For Identification of Efficient Measurement Degrees-of-Freedom For Mode Survey Testing , 2005 .

[25]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[26]  F. Udwadia Methodology for Optimum Sensor Locations for Parameter Identification in Dynamic Systems , 1994 .

[27]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[28]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[29]  Peter Thomson,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for modal identification of structures using genetic algorithms—a case study: the olympic stadium in Cali, Colombia , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[30]  J R Saunders,et al.  A particle swarm optimizer with passive congregation. , 2004, Bio Systems.

[31]  D. Kammer Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[32]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[33]  Q. H. Wu,et al.  A heuristic particle swarm optimizer for optimization of pin connected structures , 2007 .

[34]  Michael A. Demetriou,et al.  A computational scheme for the optimal sensor/actuator placement of flexible structures using spatial H2 measures , 2006 .

[35]  Rex K. Kincaid,et al.  D-optimal designs for sensor and actuator locations , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[36]  M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Sensor placement methodologies for dynamic testing , 1998 .

[37]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Optimal Sensor Placement Methodology for Identification with Unmeasured Excitation , 2001 .

[38]  David Christopher Zimmerman,et al.  A Comparison of Modal Test Planning Techniques: Excitation and Sensor Placement Using the NASA 8-bay Truss , 1994 .

[39]  Keith Worden,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for fault detection , 2001 .

[40]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification , 2008 .

[41]  Claus-Peter Fritzen,et al.  A note on fast computation of effective independence through QR downdating for sensor placement , 2009 .

[42]  C. B. Larson,et al.  A comparative study of metrics for modal pre-test sensor and actuator selection using the JPL/MPI testbed truss , 1994 .

[43]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[44]  David A. Pape SELECTION OF MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS FOR EXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[45]  Peter Avitabile,et al.  LOCATING OPTIMAL REFERENCES FOR MODAL TESTING , 2002 .

[46]  Cyrille Stephan,et al.  Sensor placement for modal identification , 2012 .

[47]  Fuzhen Zhang Matrix Theory: Basic Results and Techniques , 1999 .

[48]  P. H. Kirkegaard,et al.  On the optimal location of sensors for parametric identification of linear structural systems , 1994 .

[49]  C. Papadimitriou,et al.  The effect of prediction error correlation on optimal sensor placement in structural dynamics , 2012 .

[50]  Emerson Tongco,et al.  Optimal sensor placement and active vibration suppression of large flexible space structures , 1994 .

[51]  D. Kammer,et al.  Enhancement of On-Orbit Modal Identification of Large Space Structures Through Sensor Placement , 1994 .

[52]  William A. Sethares,et al.  Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification via a genetic algorithm , 1993 .

[53]  Daniel C. Kammer,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods , 1996 .

[54]  Firdaus E. Udwadia,et al.  A Methodology for Optimal Sensor Locations for Identification of Dynamic Systems , 1978 .

[55]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[56]  Dongsheng Li,et al.  The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement , 2007 .

[57]  C. Papadimitriou Pareto optimal sensor locations for structural identification , 2005 .

[58]  Amir Fijany,et al.  A New Method for Sensor Placement Optimization , 2005 .

[59]  Sanjay R. Arwade,et al.  Computational Analysis of Randomness in Structural Mechanics , 2011 .

[60]  Mohammad Azarbayejani,et al.  A probabilistic approach for optimal sensor allocation in structural health monitoring , 2008 .

[61]  J.E.T. Penny,et al.  Evaluation of a Method for Automatic Selection of Measurement Locations Based on Subspace-Matching , 1996 .

[62]  Michele Meo,et al.  On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure , 2005 .

[63]  Martin Hromcik,et al.  Optimal sensors placement and spillover suppression , 2012 .

[64]  Ernesto Heredia-Zavoni,et al.  Optimal instrumentation of uncertain structural systems subject to earthquake ground motions , 1998 .

[65]  J. Beck,et al.  Entropy-Based Optimal Sensor Location for Structural Model Updating , 2000 .