Temporal Structure of Human Gaze Dynamics Is Invariant During Free Viewing

We investigate the dynamic structure of human gaze and present an experimental study of the frequency components of the change in gaze position over time during free viewing of computer-generated fractal images. We show that changes in gaze position are scale-invariant in time with statistical properties that are characteristic of a random walk process. We quantify and track changes in the temporal structure using a well-defined scaling parameter called the Hurst exponent, H. We find H is robust regardless of the spatial complexity generated by the fractal images. In addition, we find the Hurst exponent is invariant across all participants, including those with distinct changes to higher order visual processes due to neural degeneration. The value we find for H of 0.57 shows that the gaze dynamics during free viewing of fractal images are consistent with a random walk process with persistent movements. Our research suggests the human visual system may have a common strategy that drives the dynamics of human gaze during exploration.

[1]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades Keep the Eyes' Balance During Fixation , 2004, Psychological science.

[2]  S. Martinez-Conde,et al.  An oculomotor continuum from exploration to fixation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  T. Laike,et al.  Human physiological benefits of viewing nature: EEG responses to exact and statistical fractal patterns. , 2015, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[4]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Ballard,et al.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[6]  C. Redies,et al.  A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[7]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Modeling the control of fixational eye movements with neurophysiological delays. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[8]  Giuseppe Boccignone,et al.  Ecological Sampling of Gaze Shifts , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[9]  Avi Caspi,et al.  Scaling of horizontal and vertical fixational eye movements. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Bernice E. Rogowitz,et al.  Shape perception and low-dimension fractal boundary contours , 1990, Other Conferences.

[11]  S. Monte.  The Clinical Spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease -The Charge Toward Comprehensive Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies , 2011 .

[12]  Philip C. Ko,et al.  Visual Cognition in Alzheimer’s Disease and Its Functional Implications , 2011 .

[13]  Mark Nawrot,et al.  Vision and cognition in Alzheimer’s disease , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Knut Engedal,et al.  Frontotemporal Dementia , 2016, Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology.

[15]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Is the Geometry of Nature Fractal? , 1998, Science.

[16]  Saulo D. S. Reis,et al.  Statistical patterns of visual search for hidden objects , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[17]  J. Victor,et al.  The unsteady eye: an information-processing stage, not a bug , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  J. Cutting,et al.  Fractal curves and complexity , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Statistics of natural image categories , 2003, Network.

[20]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches , 2008 .

[21]  David H Brainard,et al.  Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[22]  B. Miller,et al.  Saccade abnormalities in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer disease. , 2012, Archives of neurology.

[23]  Giuseppe Boccignone,et al.  Modelling gaze shift as a constrained random walk , 2004 .

[24]  Indre V. Viskontas,et al.  Visual search patterns in semantic dementia show paradoxical facilitation of binding processes , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  S. Zucker,et al.  Evaluating the fractal dimension of profiles. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[26]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  Daniel Mirman,et al.  Lévy-like diffusion in eye movements during spoken-language comprehension. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  B. Boeve,et al.  The Behavioral Neurology of Dementia: Frontmatter , 2009 .

[29]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  An integrated model of fixational eye movements and microsaccades , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  D. Field,et al.  Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes , 1997, Vision Research.

[31]  Deborah J. Aks,et al.  Quantifying Aesthetic Preference for Chaotic Patterns , 1996 .

[32]  V. Billock.  Neural acclimation to 1/ f spatial frequency spectra in natural images transduced by the human visual system , 2000 .

[33]  Eileen Kowler.  Eye movements: The past 25years , 2011, Vision Research.

[34]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  The Limited Scaling Range of Empirical Fractals , 1998 .

[35]  J. Kelso,et al.  Fractal time and 1/ f spectra in dynamic images and human vision , 2001 .

[36]  J. A. Wise,et al.  Perceptual and physiological responses to the visual complexity of fractal patterns. , 2005, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[37]  Anita Mehta,et al.  Searching and fixating: Scale-invariance vs. characteristic timescales in attentional processes , 2011 .

[38]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  Universal aesthetic of fractals , 2003, Comput. Graph..

[39]  Theo Geisel,et al.  The ecology of gaze shifts , 2000, Neurocomputing.