User Preferences in the Design of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems

The transport network and mobility aspects are constantly changing, and major changes are expected in the coming years in terms of safety and sustainability purposes. In this paper, we present the main conclusions and analysis of data collected from a survey of drivers in Spain and Portugal regarding user preferences, highlighting the main functionalities and behavior that an advanced driver assistance system must have in order to grant it special importance on the road to prevent accidents and also to enable drivers to have a pleasant journey. Based on the results obtained from the survey, we developed and present a working prototype for an advanced driver assistance system (ADAS), its architecture and rules systems that allowed us to create and test some scenarios in a real environment.

[1]  Ying Li,et al.  Automatic Dangerous Driving Intensity Analysis for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems From Multimodal Driving Signals , 2018, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[2]  N Viborg.  OLDER AND YOUNGER DRIVERS ATTITUDES TOWARD IN-CAR ITS , 1999 .

[3]  Lei Zhao,et al.  Effect of driving experience on collision avoidance braking: an experimental investigation and computational modelling , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Claude Marin-Lamellet,et al.  Difficulties experienced by older drivers during their regular driving and their expectations towards Advanced Driving Aid Systems and vehicle automation , 2018 .

[5]  Thomas Seacrist,et al.  Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: Teen and parent impressions, perceived need, and intervention preferences , 2018, Traffic injury prevention.

[6]  A. Diederich,et al.  Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: Effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Driver Assistance System With a Dual Control Scheme: Effectiveness of Identifying Driver Drowsiness and Preventing Lane Departure Accidents , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[8]  Mario Muñoz Organero,et al.  Artemisa: A Personal Driving Assistant for Fuel Saving , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[9]  Beth T. Stalvey,et al.  Older drivers and cataract: driving habits and crash risk. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[10]  Heetae Kim,et al.  Understanding driver adoption of car navigation systems using the extended technology acceptance model , 2015, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Christian Maag,et al.  Studying Effects of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) on Individual and Group Level Using Multi-Driver Simulation , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[12]  J.C.F. de Winter,et al.  The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Journal of safety research.

[13]  Radu Marculescu,et al.  Exploring congestion phase transitions in vehicular traffic via topology and driver behavior modeling , 2011, 2011 IEEE Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems.

[14]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[15]  Panagiotis Tsiotras,et al.  Nonlinear Driver Parameter Estimation and Driver Steering Behavior Analysis for ADAS Using Field Test Data , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[16]  Helmut Hlavacs,et al.  The mere presence of an attentive and emotionally responsive virtual character influences focus of attention and perceived stress , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  Developing human-machine interaction components for a driver assistance system for safe speed and safe distance , 2008 .

[18]  Hanan Alnizami,et al.  Help on the road: Effects of vehicle manual consultation in driving performance across modalities , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Isabelle Milleville-Pennel,et al.  Driving for Real or on a Fixed-Base Simulator: Is It so Different? An Explorative Study , 2015, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[20]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[21]  E. J. Mejías,et al.  [A review of questionnaires exploring driver's exposure and risk factors in road crashes]. , 2011, Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra.

[22]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  The effect of age, gender and roadway environment on the acceptance and effectiveness of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems , 2015 .

[23]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[24]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Warning Signal Design: A Key Human Factors Issue in an In-Vehicle Front-To-Rear-End Collision Warning System , 1992 .

[25]  Eric R Teoh,et al.  What's in a name? Drivers' perceptions of the use of five SAE Level 2 driving automation systems. , 2020, Journal of safety research.

[26]  J. Henry,et al.  The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. , 2003, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[27]  Jongeun Choi,et al.  Driving Assistant Companion With Voice Interface Using Long Short-Term Memory Networks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[28]  John Richardson,et al.  The influence of alarm timing on driver response to collision warning systems following system failure , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[29]  A. Pauzie,et al.  A method to assess the driver mental workload: The driving activity load index (DALI) , 2008 .

[30]  Scott Stevens.  The Relationship between Driver Acceptance and System Effectiveness in Car-Based Collision Warning Systems: Evidence of an Overreliance Effect in Older Drivers? , 2012 .

[31]  E. J. Mejías,et al.  Cuestionarios sobre factores de riesgo de la exposición y la accidentalidad por tráfico en conductores: una revisión , 2011 .

[32]  J. Castillo,et al.  Design and Validation of a Questionnaire Exploring Risky-driving Patterns in Young Drivers , 2012 .

[33]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control , 2003, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..