Repetition effects in visual search

Maljkovie and Nakayama (1994) demonstrated an automatic benefit of repeating the defining feature of the target in search guided by salience. Thus, repetition influences target selection in search guided by bottom-up factors. Four experiments demonstrate this repetition effect in search guided by top-down factors, and so the repetition effect is not merely part of the mechanism for determining what display elements are salient. The effect is replicated in singleton search and in three situations requiring different degrees of top-down guidance: when the feature defining the target is less salient than the feature defining the response, when there is more than one singleton in the defining dimension, and when the target is defined by a conjunction of features. Repetition does not change the priorities of targets, relative to distractors: Display size affects search equally whether the target is repeated or changed. More than one mechanism may underlie the repetition effect in different experiments, but assuming that there is a unitary mechanism, a short-term episodic memory mechanism is proposed.

[1]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  P. Bertelson Sequential Redundancy and Speed in a Serial Two-Choice Responding Task , 1961 .

[3]  P. Bertelson S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task , 1963 .

[4]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory , 1965 .

[5]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Serial Choice Reaction-time as a Function of Response versus Signal-and-Response Repetition , 1965, Nature.

[6]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task as a function of response-signal time interval , 1966 .

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  On the role of interference in short-term retention. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  D. Hale Sequential Effects in a Two-Choice Serial Reaction Task , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  P M Rabbitt,et al.  Repetition Effects and Signal Classification Strategies in Serial Choice-Response Tasks , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time. , 1969 .

[11]  S. Keele Repetition effect: A memory-dependent process. , 1969 .

[12]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Repetition effect as a function of event uncertainty, response-stimulus interval, and rank order of the event , 1972 .

[13]  I. Biederman,et al.  Mental set and mental shift revisited , 1976 .

[14]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Attention and Preattention , 1977 .

[15]  G. Lockhead,et al.  Holistic vs. attribute repetition effects in classifying stimuli , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[16]  P Rabbitt,et al.  Modulation of Selective Attention by Sequential Effects in Visual Search Tasks , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  B. Fletcher Wholistic and Analytic Stimulus Processing: The Development of Selective Perceptual Strategies , 1981 .

[19]  E. Soetens,et al.  Automatic aftereffects in two-choice reaction time: a mathematical representation of some concepts. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  E. Soetens,et al.  Expectancy or Automatic Facilitation? Separating Sequential Effects in Two-Choice Reaction Time , 1985 .

[22]  S. Tipper The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[24]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[25]  S. Hochstein,et al.  How Serial is Serial Processing in Vision? , 1989, Perception.

[26]  S P Tipper,et al.  Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: time course and disruption. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. , 1991 .

[29]  W. Neill,et al.  Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval , 1992 .

[30]  A. Treisman Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[31]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Cathleen M. Moore,et al.  Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? , 1994 .

[34]  S. Tipper,et al.  Behavioural Goals Determine Inhibitory Mechanisms of Selective Attention , 1994 .

[35]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[36]  S. Tipper,et al.  A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. , 1994 .

[37]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[41]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[42]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  W. Trammell Neill,et al.  Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. , 1997 .

[44]  H. Egeth,et al.  Goal-directed guidance of attention: evidence from conjunctive visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. , 1998 .

[46]  Bradley S. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture Is Contingent on Attentional Set for Displaywide Visual Features , 1998 .

[47]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[48]  G D Logan,et al.  Decomposing visual search: evidence of multiple item-specific skills. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.