Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design

A number of pedagogies and approaches are often quoted in the e-learning literature-constructivism, communities of practice, collaboration-but we suggest that much of what is described could more easily be explained in terms of didactic and behaviourist approaches to learning. In this paper we propose a model that supports the development of pedagogically driven approaches to e-learning. The paper begins by explaining how models can be used to represent theoretical approaches and to support practitioners' engagement with these. After outlining the method through which this can be achieved, a model of pedagogies is developed. This process begins with a review of learning theories, from which key components of learning are distilled. This abstraction is used as an analytical tool, allowing components of learning scenarios to be described and related to appropriate theoretical approaches through the use of specific tools and resources. Our assertion is that a better articulation and mapping of different pedagogical processes, tools and techniques will provide a pedagogic approach that is more reflexive and consistent with practitioners' theoretical perspective on learning and teaching.

[1]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to E-Learning , 2003 .

[2]  R. J. B. The Child's Conception of the World , 1929, Nature.

[3]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Winning the toss and electing to bat : maximising the opportunities of online learning , 2002 .

[4]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[5]  Jen Harvey,et al.  A toolkit for supporting evaluation , 2001 .

[6]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[7]  Jen Harvey,et al.  Using a toolkit to support the evaluation of learning , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  C. Griffin,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Learning , 1998 .

[9]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Supporting Structured Change: Toolkits for Design and Evaluation , 2002 .

[10]  Lois W. Sayrs Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[11]  S. Clegg,et al.  The Emperor's New Clothes: Globalisation and e-learning in Higher Education , 2003 .

[12]  Peter Jarvis,et al.  Adult learning in the social context , 1987 .

[13]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  The Idea Of Higher Education , 1991 .

[14]  H. Beetham,et al.  Career development of learning technology staff: Scoping study , 2001 .

[15]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Assessing and enhancing quality using toolkits , 2000 .

[16]  M. Oliver,et al.  A pedagogical framework for embedding C&IT into the curriculum , 1998 .

[17]  Paul Joyce,et al.  Examining the five-stage e-moderating model: designed and emergent practice in the learning technology profession , 2003 .

[18]  B. Nardi Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[19]  Annemarie Hauf,et al.  Computers in education , 1983 .

[20]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[21]  S. Kvale Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[22]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Embedding Theory into Learning Technology Practice with Toolkits , 2002 .

[23]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Utilization-focused evaluation , 1998 .

[24]  L. Christman Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1977 .

[25]  William B. Borgers DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION. , 1919 .