TMalphaDB and TMbetaDB: web servers to study the structural role of sequence motifs in α-helix and β-barrel domains of membrane proteins

BackgroundMembrane proteins represent over 25 % of human protein genes and account for more than 60 % of drug targets due to their accessibility from the extracellular environment. The increasing number of available crystal structures of these proteins in the Protein Data Bank permits an initial estimation of their structural properties.DescriptionWe have developed two web servers—TMalphaDB for α-helix bundles and TMbetaDB for β-barrels—to analyse the growing repertoire of available crystal structures of membrane proteins. TMalphaDB and TMbetaDB permit to search for these specific sequence motifs in a non-redundant structure database of transmembrane segments and quantify structural parameters such as ϕ and ψ backbone dihedral angles, χ1 side chain torsion angle, unit bend and unit twist.ConclusionsThe structural information offered by TMalphaDB and TMbetaDB permits to quantify structural distortions induced by specific sequence motifs, and to elucidate their role in the 3D structure. This specific structural information has direct implications in homology modeling of the growing sequences of membrane proteins lacking experimental structure. TMalphaDB and TMbetaDB are freely available at http://lmc.uab.cat/TMalphaDB and http://lmc.uab.cat/TMbetaDB.

[1]  Gianluigi Caltabiano,et al.  Impact of Helix Irregularities on Sequence Alignment and Homology Modeling of G Protein‐Coupled Receptors , 2012, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[2]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Crystal Structure of the β2Adrenergic Receptor-Gs protein complex , 2011, Nature.

[3]  C. Deber,et al.  A measure of helical propensity for amino acids in membrane environments , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  Mark B Gerstein,et al.  Computational analysis of membrane proteins: the largest class of drug targets. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[5]  John P. Overington,et al.  Modeling α‐helical transmembrane domains: The calculation and use of substitution tables for lipid‐facing residues , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  David T. Jones,et al.  De novo protein design using pairwise potentials and a genetic algorithm , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  J. Sussman,et al.  JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia , 2013 .

[8]  Leonardo Pardo,et al.  Relation between sequence and structure in membrane proteins , 2013, Bioinform..

[9]  Saskia Nijmeijer,et al.  A Structural Insight into the Reorientation of Transmembrane Domains 3 and 5 during Family A G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activation , 2011, Molecular Pharmacology.

[10]  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al.  PDB_TM: selection and membrane localization of transmembrane proteins in the protein data bank , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  W. DeGrado,et al.  A thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids. , 1990, Science.

[12]  Leonardo Pardo,et al.  Influence of the g- conformation of Ser and Thr on the structure of transmembrane helices. , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  Andrew J. Doig,et al.  Properties and identification of human protein drug targets , 2009, Bioinform..

[14]  Toby W Allen,et al.  Ion conduction and conformational flexibility of a bacterial voltage-gated sodium channel , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  L. Pardo,et al.  Ser and Thr residues modulate the conformation of pro-kinked transmembrane alpha-helices. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[16]  John P. Overington,et al.  How many drug targets are there? , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[17]  Hyeon Joo,et al.  OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  M. Bansal,et al.  HELANAL: A Program to Characterize Helix Geometry in Proteins , 2000, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[19]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Christopher G. Tate,et al.  Overcoming barriers to membrane protein structure determination , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Julien Rey,et al.  Structural determinants stabilizing helical distortions related to proline. , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[22]  María Martín,et al.  Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Richard A Stein,et al.  Protonation drives the conformational switch in the multidrug transporter LmrP. , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[24]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in transmembrane helices: the GxxxG motif occurs frequently and in association with beta-branched residues at neighboring positions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Dániel Kozma,et al.  PDBTM: Protein Data Bank of transmembrane proteins after 8 years , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[27]  Leonardo Pardo,et al.  Ser and Thr Residues Modulate the Conformation of Pro-Kinked Transmembrane α-Helices , 2004 .

[28]  Kalle Jonasson,et al.  Prediction of the human membrane proteome , 2010, Proteomics.