Intensive tool-practice and skillfulness facilitate the extension of body representations in humans

The brain׳s representation of the body can be extended to include objects that are not originally part of the body. Various studies have found both extremely rapid extensions that occur as soon as an object is held, as well as extremely slow extensions that require weeks of training. Due to species and methodological differences, it is unclear whether the studies were probing different representations, or revealing multiple aspects of the same representation. Here, we present evidence that objects (cotton balls) held by a tool (chopsticks) are rapidly integrated into the body representation, as indexed by fading of the cotton balls (or 'second-order extensions') from a positive afterimage. Skillfulness with chopsticks was predictive of more rapid integration of the second-order cotton balls held by this tool. We also found that extensive training over a period of weeks augmented the level of integration. Together, our findings demonstrate integration of second-order objects held by tools, and reveal that the body representation probed by positive afterimages is subject to both rapid and slow processes of adaptive change.

[1]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[2]  P. Davies,et al.  Effects of Movements upon the Appearance and Duration of a Prolonged Visual Afterimage: 1. Changes Arising from the Movement of a Portion of the Body Incorporated in the Afterimaged Scene , 1973 .

[3]  Alice C. Roy,et al.  When action is not enough: Tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to Body Schema , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  How many motoric body representations can we grasp? , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[6]  K. Vaesen.  The cognitive bases of human tool use , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  M. Turvey.  Dynamic touch. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[8]  C. Colby.  Action-Oriented Spatial Reference Frames in Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[9]  K. Fujita,et al.  Spontaneous Tool Use by a Tonkean Macaque (Macaca tonkeana) , 1998, Folia Primatologica.

[10]  Hika Kuroshima,et al.  How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[11]  Effects of Movements upon the Appearance and Duration of a Prolonged Visual Afterimage: 2. Changes Arising from Movement of the Observer in Relation to the Previously Afterimaged Scene , 1973 .

[12]  G. Holmes,et al.  Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions , 1911 .

[13]  J. G. Wallace,et al.  Changes in the Size and Shape of Visual After-Images Observed in Complete Darkness during Changes of Position in Space , 1959 .

[14]  C. Gross,et al.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. , 1994, Science.

[15]  Thomas A Carlson,et al.  Rapid Assimilation of External Objects Into the Body Schema , 2010, Psychological science.

[16]  T. Carlson,et al.  Mirror, mirror, on the wall, is that even my hand at all? Changes in the afterimage of one's reflection in a mirror in response to bodily movement , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  A. Iriki,et al.  Tool-use learning selectively induces expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, its receptor trkB, and neurotrophin 3 in the intraparietal multisensorycortex of monkeys. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Sensation at the tips of invisible tools , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  M Bross,et al.  Emmert's Law in the Dark: Active and Passive Proprioceptive Effects on Positive Visual Afterimages , 2000, Perception.

[20]  Alessandro Farnè,et al.  Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  Shaping multisensory action–space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  Tool-use learning induces BDNF expression in a selective portion of monkey anterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Brain research. Molecular brain research.

[23]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Primate Cognition , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[24]  F. Vignemont.  Body schema and body image—Pros and cons , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  W. McGrew.  Chimpanzee Technology , 2010, Science.

[26]  G. Orban,et al.  The Representation of Tool Use in Humans and Monkeys: Common and Uniquely Human Features , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Jeffrey B. Wagman,et al.  Affordances and Inertial Constraints on Tool Use , 2001 .

[28]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach , 2003, Current Biology.

[29]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Alice C. Roy,et al.  Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema , 2009, Current Biology.

[32]  A. Harcourt.  The Chimpanzees of Gombe. Patterns of Behavior, Jane Goodall. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussets (1986), xii, +671. Price $30 , 1988 .

[33]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Being in the dark about your hand: Resolution of visuo-proprioceptive conflict by disowning visible limbs , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  R. Byrne,et al.  Animal Tool-Use , 2010, Current Biology.

[35]  Fulvio Domini,et al.  Dynamic Manipulation Generates Touch Information That Can Modify Vision , 2013, Psychological science.

[36]  T. Asamizuya,et al.  Gray and white matter changes associated with tool-use learning in macaque monkeys , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.

[38]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  S. Ichinose,et al.  Extension of Corticocortical Afferents into the Anterior Bank of the Intraparietal Sulcus by Tool-use Training in Adult Monkeys , 2005 .

[41]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Proprioceptive Illusions Induced by Muscle Vibration: Contribution by Muscle Spindles to Perception? , 1972, Science.

[42]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[43]  Valentina Truppa,et al.  Selection of Effective Stone Tools by Wild Bearded Capuchin Monkeys , 2009, Current Biology.