Advancing the Accuracy of Computational Models for Double-Sided Incremental Forming

Double-Sided Incremental Forming (DSIF) is a rapid-prototyping manufacturing process for metal forming that, for low-volume production, is competitively energy-efficient. However, controlling the DSIF process in terms of accuracy and formability is an ongoing challenge. These control challenges arise due to a lack of understanding of the underlying deformation mechanisms in DSIF, which finite element simulations can help to unravel. However, DSIF pushes the limits of modern finite element formulations due to true strains that approach one, finite rotations, nonlinear contact, and triaxial stress states that range across multiple length scales. To confidently develop a finite element model of DSIF, an extensive verification process must be considered, which is the objective of this study. In this work, different finite element types and varying amounts of artificial acceleration are investigated, and recommendations based on efficiency and accuracy are summarized. A simplified, axisymmetric geometry was considered to reduce simulation time. For this geometry, accelerating the explicit finite element simulation by a mass factor of 105 or greater affected the stress triaxiality in the sheet by as much as 40% in some locations with respect to the quasi-static case. Additionally, the ratio of the kinetic energy to internal energy of the sheet was not a reliable indicator of whether a DSIF simulation is approximately quasi-static.

[1]  Fangyi Li,et al.  A review on the recent development of incremental sheet-forming process , 2017 .

[2]  Dongkai Xu,et al.  Investigation of material deformation mechanism in double side incremental sheet forming , 2015 .

[3]  Phill-Seung Lee,et al.  Insight into finite element shell discretizations by use of the basic shell mathematical model , 2005 .

[4]  Jun Chen,et al.  Effective forming strategy for double-sided incremental forming considering in-plane curvature and tool direction , 2016 .

[5]  C. Henrard,et al.  Forming forces in single point incremental forming: prediction by finite element simulations, validation and sensitivity , 2011 .

[6]  A. Erman Tekkaya,et al.  State-of-the-art of simulation of sheet metal forming , 2000 .

[7]  T. Hughes Generalization of selective integration procedures to anisotropic and nonlinear media , 1980 .

[8]  Kornel Ehmann,et al.  An Efficient and General Finite Element Model for Double-Sided Incremental Forming , 2016 .

[9]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A uniform strain hexahedron and quadrilateral with orthogonal hourglass control , 1981 .

[10]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[11]  Kornel Ehmann,et al.  Effects of Tool Positions in Accumulated Double-Sided Incremental Forming on Part Geometry , 2015 .

[12]  Jian Cao,et al.  Deformation mechanics in single-point and accumulative double-sided incremental forming , 2013 .

[13]  Hyunki Kim,et al.  Comparison of 3D yield functions for finite element simulation of single point incremental forming (SPIF) of aluminum 7075 , 2017 .

[14]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Mechanics of fracture in single point incremental forming , 2012 .

[15]  M. Banu,et al.  Prediction of Negative Bulge in Two Point Incremental Forming of an Asymmetric Shape Part , 2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[16]  P. Wriggers Nonlinear Finite Element Methods , 2008 .