Building Our Way Out of Congestion

Government policy explicitly states that we will not try to build our way out of congestion, yet Government transportation spending is at record levels, having more than doubled in the past five years and expected to continue growing significantly. The predominant share of this is for roading, much of it for new roads, and this allocation is not planned to reduce over the next decade. A major motivation for new road construction is congestion levels and travel time variability. To any rational observer, we appear to be trying to build our way out of congestion, contrary to the rhetoric of Government policy. It seems counter-productive to be expanding our road network at a time when fuel prices are increasing at a much faster rate than traffic volumes, and fuel supply itself appears to be no longer guaranteed. The resources involved in expanding the road network could be much more wisely spent on managing traffic growth and providing alternatives to private motor vehicle travel. This paper looks at available data to understand congestion trends relative to roading expenditure, travel time variability, and fuel price and supply. It considers ways to provide more sustainable transportation, and makes recommendations for developing a comprehensive suite of travel indicators that better represents a more sustainable transport system. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E215377.

[1]  Terry L. Friesz,et al.  Equilibrium Decomposed Optimization: A Heuristic for the Continuous Equilibrium Network Design Problem , 1987, Transp. Sci..

[2]  Y Iida,et al.  Transportation Network Analysis , 1997 .

[3]  Paul Thorsnes,et al.  The Transportation/Land Use Connection , 2007 .

[4]  Larry J. LeBlanc,et al.  CONTINUOUS EQUILIBRIUM NETWORK DESIGN MODELS , 1979 .

[5]  William R. McShane,et al.  A review of pedestrian safety models for urban areas in Low and Middle Income Countries , 2016 .

[6]  Terry L. Friesz,et al.  TRANSPORTATION NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM, DESIGN AND AGGREGATION: KEY DEVELOPMENTS AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES. IN: THE AUTOMOBILE , 1985 .

[7]  Hai Yang,et al.  Models and algorithms for road network design: a review and some new developments , 1998 .

[8]  Dirck Van Vliet Selected node-pair analysis in dial's assignment algorithm , 1981 .

[9]  Hai Yang,et al.  Transport bilevel programming problems: recent methodological advances , 2001 .

[10]  Michael G.H. Bell,et al.  CONTINUOUS EQUILIBRIUM NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM WITH ELASTIC DEMAND: DERIVATIVE-FREE SOLUTION METHODS , 1998 .

[11]  Nicholas J. Garber,et al.  Traffic and Highway Engineering , 1988 .

[12]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[13]  Fabien Leurent,et al.  CONTRIBUTIONS TO LOGIT ASSIGNMENT MODEL , 1995 .

[14]  Larry J. LeBlanc,et al.  An Algorithm for the Discrete Network Design Problem , 1975 .

[15]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Exact local solution of the continuous network design problem via stochastic user equilibrium assignment , 1994 .

[16]  Terry L. Friesz,et al.  A Simulated Annealing Approach to the Network Design Problem with Variational Inequality Constraints , 1992, Transp. Sci..

[17]  F. Benjamin Zhan,et al.  Shortest Path Algorithms: An Evaluation Using Real Road Networks , 1998, Transp. Sci..