Helioseismic Constraints on the Structure of the Solar Tachocline

This paper presents a series of helioseismic inversions aimed at determining with the highest possible confidence and accuracy the structure of the rotational shear layer (the tachocline) located beneath the base of the solar convective envelope. We are particularly interested in identifying features of the inversions that are robust properties of the data, in the sense of not being overly influenced by the choice of analysis methods. Toward this aim we carry out two types of two-dimensional linear inversions, namely Regularized Least-Squares (RLS) and Subtractive Optimally Localized Averages (SOLA), the latter formulated in terms of either the rotation rate or its radial gradient. We also perform nonlinear parametric least-squares fits using a genetic algorithm-based forward modeling technique. The sensitivity of each method is thoroughly tested on synthetic data. The three methods are then used on the LOWL 2 yr frequency-splitting data set. The tachocline is found to have an equatorial thickness of w/R☉ = 0.039 ± 0.013 and equatorial central radius rc/R☉ = 0.693 ± 0.002. All three techniques also indicate that the tachocline is prolate, with a difference in central radius Δrc/R☉ 0.024 ± 0.004 between latitude 60° and the equator. Assuming uncorrelated and normally distributed errors, a strictly spherical tachocline can be rejected at the 99% confidence level. No statistically significant variation in tachocline thickness with latitude is found. Implications of these results for hydrodynamical and magnetohydrodynamical models of the solar tachocline are discussed.

[1]  Sabatino Sofia,et al.  The internal solar angular velocity: Theory, observations and relationship to solar magnetic fields; Proceedings of the Eighth Summer Symposium, Sunspot, NM, Aug. 11-14, 1986 , 1987 .

[2]  E. Parker.  A solar dynamo surface wave at the interface between convection and nonuniform rotation , 1993 .

[3]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[4]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[5]  S. M. Chitre,et al.  Helioseismic Studies of Differential Rotation in the Solar Envelope by the Solar Oscillations Investigation Using the Michelson Doppler Imager , 1998 .

[6]  S. Tobias.  Diffusivity Quenching as a Mechanism for Parker's Surface Dynamo , 1996 .

[7]  H. Brück.  Inside stars , 1974, Nature.

[8]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, 2nd ed. , 1993 .

[9]  P. Charbonneau,et al.  Angular Momentum Transport in Magnetized Stellar Radiative Zones. IV. Ferraro’s Theorem and the Solar Tachocline , 1999 .

[10]  Efficient implementations of the SOLA mollifier method , 1997 .

[11]  P. Gilman,et al.  Joint Instability of Latitudinal Differential Rotation and Toroidal Magnetic Fields below the Solar Convection Zone , 1997 .

[12]  C. Proffitt,et al.  Particle Transport Processes , 1993 .

[13]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  The depth of the solar convection zone , 1991 .

[14]  J. R. Elliott,et al.  Calibration of the Thickness of the Solar Tachocline , 1999 .

[15]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  ON COMPARING HELIOSEISMIC TWO-DIMENSIONAL INVERSION METHODS , 1994 .

[16]  M. Thompson,et al.  Measurement of the Rotation Rate in the Deep Solar Interior , 1995 .

[17]  P. Charbonneau.  Genetic algorithms in astronomy and astrophysics , 1995 .

[18]  P. Charbonneau,et al.  The Rotation of the Solar Core Inferred by Genetic Forward Modeling , 1998 .

[19]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C (2nd ed.): the art of scientific computing , 1992 .

[20]  P. Charbonneau,et al.  On the Generation of Equipartition-Strength Magnetic Fields by Turbulent Hydromagnetic Dynamos , 1996 .

[21]  T. Brown.  Solar rotation as a function of depth and latitude , 1985, Nature.

[22]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[23]  India.,et al.  Solar internal rotation rate and the latitudinal variation of the tachocline , 1997, astro-ph/9709083.

[24]  T. Brown,et al.  Depth and latitude dependence of solar rotation , 1987 .

[25]  P. Goode,et al.  What we know about the sun's internal rotation from solar oscillations , 1991 .

[26]  L. Kitchatinov,et al.  The slender solar tachocline: a magnetic model , 1997 .

[27]  Sylvain G. Korzennik,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of the Interior of the Sun and Sun-like Stars , 1998 .

[28]  J. Miller,et al.  Nonlinear Convection of a Compressible Fluid in a Rotating Spherical Shell , 1986 .

[29]  Frank Hill,et al.  The Equatorial Rotation Rate in the Solar Convection Zone , 1987 .

[30]  P. Charbonneau,et al.  Solar Interface Dynamos. II. Linear, Kinematic Models in Spherical Geometry , 1997 .

[31]  S. Basu.  Seismology of the base of the solar convection zone , 1997 .

[32]  P. R. Wilson,et al.  The Rotational Structure of the Region below the Solar Convection Zone , 1997 .

[33]  T. Brown,et al.  Inferring the sun's internal angular velocity from observed p-mode frequency splittings , 1989 .

[34]  M. Thompson,et al.  On the use of the error correlation function in helioseismic inversions , 1996 .

[35]  A. Kosovichev.  Helioseismic Constraints on the Gradient of Angular Velocity at the Base of the Solar Convection Zone , 1996 .

[36]  G. Glatzmaier.  Numerical simulations of stellar convective dynamos. II. Field propagation in the convection zone , 1985 .

[37]  Steven Tomczyk,et al.  An instrument to observe low-degree solar oscillations , 1995 .

[38]  Sarbani Basu,et al.  Seismic measurement of the depth of the solar convection zone , 1997 .

[39]  M. McIntyre,et al.  Inevitability of a magnetic field in the Sun's radiative interior , 1998, Nature.

[40]  S. M. Chitre,et al.  The Current State of Solar Modeling , 1996, Science.