Spatial Variation of Soil Properties Relating to Vegetation Changes

Bekele and Hudnall provide an interesting perspective on the spatial variation of soil chemical properties in a natural area undergoing transition from prairie to forest. Their focus is on the unique calcareous prairie ecosystem of Louisiana where prairie remnants are being encroached upon by the forest, primarily eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana L.). Bekele and Hudnall were especially interested in investigating any differences in spatial variability among similar sites and in documenting the scale at which the variability occurs. Geostatistical methods have been used to describe and model spatial patterns in soil data for more than 20 years. The accessibility of user-friendly geostatistical software packages has increased the use of spatial analysis of soil’s data but carries the risk that these tools are used without due consideration of the underlying theory, especially in the field of semivariogram modeling or recommended good practices. The feedback between plant community composition and species distribution and soil properties in natural systems has promise to provide enhanced insight into the short- and long-term relationships between plants and soil properties. This is an intriguing area of research that couples plant ecology and soil science and should provide valuable information on the interaction of soils with the processes of plant succession and competition. Researchers in this area are urged to be cautious in verifying the assumptions behind popular geostatistical methods and explicit in describing the important steps such as trend analysis, which can reveal critical interpretive information.

[1]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[2]  W. Hudnall,et al.  STABLE CARBON ISOTOPE STUDY OF THE PRAIRIE-FOREST TRANSITION SOIL IN LOUISIANA 1 , 2003 .

[3]  Katherine E. Mills,et al.  MAINTENANCE OF DIVERSITY WITHIN PLANT COMMUNITIES: SOIL PATHOGENS AS AGENTS OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK , 1998 .

[4]  G. Uehara,et al.  Geostatistical Analysis of Soil Chemical Properties of Large Land Areas. I. Semi-variograms 1 , 1982 .

[5]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Physiological ecology of Juniperus virginiana in oldfields , 1976, Oecologia.

[6]  J. W. Biggar,et al.  Spatial Variability of Field-Measured Infiltration Rate1 , 1981 .

[7]  R. V. Ruhe,et al.  Ages and Development of Soil Landscapes in Relation to Climatic and Vegetational Changes in Iowa1 , 1956 .

[8]  R. Aerts.  Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks , 1999 .

[9]  P. Goovaerts.  Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties , 1998, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[10]  T. Sauer,et al.  SUGGESTIONS FOR PRESENTING KRIGING RESULTS , 2003 .

[11]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Upland Forest Continuum in the Prairie‐Forest Border Region of Wisconsin , 1951 .

[12]  Marc Voltz,et al.  Spatial interpolation of soil moisture retention curves , 1994 .

[13]  J. Johnson,et al.  Prairie-Forest Transition Soils of the South Dakota Black Hills1 , 1969 .

[14]  T. Sharik,et al.  The avian seed dispersal system of eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) , 1985 .

[15]  B. Ceccanti,et al.  Spatial variability of phosphatase, urease, protease, organic carbon and total nitrogen in soil , 1991 .

[16]  T. Sharik,et al.  Seed Longevity and Mechanisms of Regeneration of Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) , 1984 .

[17]  D. Tilman,et al.  PLANT COMPETITION AND RESOURCE AVAILABILITY IN RESPONSE TO DISTURBANCE AND FERTILIZATION , 1993 .

[18]  T. Parkin,et al.  Spatial Variability of Microbial Processes in Soil—A Review , 1993 .

[19]  Robert G. Downer,et al.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SPATIAL PREDICTION METHODS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT FOR MAPPING SOIL POTASSIUM , 2003 .

[20]  A. Konopka,et al.  FIELD-SCALE VARIABILITY OF SOIL PROPERTIES IN CENTRAL IOWA SOILS , 1994 .

[21]  R. Webster,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. II. Block kriging. , 1980 .

[22]  E. N. Transeau.  The Prairie Peninsula , 1935 .

[23]  T. Sauer,et al.  Spatial Variation of Plant-Available Phosphorus in Pastures with Contrasting Management , 2003 .

[24]  D. Anderson.  Pedogenesis in the Grassland and Adjacent Forests of the Great Plains , 1987 .

[25]  A. Knapp,et al.  Water Relations of Juniperus virginiana and Andropogon Gerardii in an Unburned Tallgrass Prairie Watershed , 1993 .

[26]  J. Briggs,et al.  Effect of fire on tree spatial patterns in a tallgrass prairie landscape , 1992 .

[27]  R. M. Aiken,et al.  Positional, Spatially Correlated and Random Components of Variability in Carbon Dioxide Efllux , 1991 .

[28]  David B. Marx,et al.  Spatial Variability of Soil Chemical Properties in Grazed Pastures , 1989 .

[29]  Glenn R. Matlack,et al.  Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge: trends in space and successional time , 1994 .

[30]  Jeffrey G. White,et al.  Soil Zinc Map of the USA using Geostatistics and Geographic Information Systems , 1997 .

[31]  T. Bragg,et al.  Changes in Prairie Vegetation under Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) in an Eastern Nebraska Bluestem Prairie , 1992 .

[32]  D. Peltzer.  Plant responses to competition and soil origin across a prairie–forest boundary , 2001 .

[33]  J. Blair,et al.  Land cover change in eastern Kansas: litter dynamics of closed-canopy eastern redcedar forests in tallgrass prairie , 2001 .

[34]  Elizabeth Pattey,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of soil respiration in agricultural fields , 1991 .

[35]  AN AUTOREGRESSION MODEL FOR A PAIRED WATERSHED COMPARISON , 2000 .

[36]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .