Proprioception from a neurally controlled lower-extremity prosthesis

An agonist-antagonist myoneural interface in a subject with a transtibial amputation improves prosthetic control. A leg up for neuroprosthetics Amputation severs bone, nerves, and muscles used for limb movement, limiting an amputee’s ability to sense and control a prosthesis. Here, Clites et al. tested autologous muscle-nerve interfaces created at the time of below-knee amputation in a human subject. Compared to four subjects with traditional amputations, the subject who received two agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces in his residuum (which were connected via synthetic electrodes to his powered prosthesis) exhibited greater joint placement control and reflexive behavior during stair walking. The subject noted little delay between intentional activation of the muscles in his residuum and movement of his prosthesis and expressed a strong sense of embodiment (identifying the prosthesis as part of him). Agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces could help restore natural sensation to prosthetic joints. Humans can precisely sense the position, speed, and torque of their body parts. This sense is known as proprioception and is essential to human motor control. Although there have been many attempts to create human-mechatronic interactions, there is still no robust, repeatable methodology to reflect proprioceptive information from a synthetic device onto the nervous system. To address this shortcoming, we present an agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI). The AMI is composed of (i) a surgical construct made up of two muscle-tendons—an agonist and an antagonist—surgically connected in series so that contraction of one muscle stretches the other and (ii) a bidirectional efferent-afferent neural control architecture. The AMI preserves the dynamic muscle relationships that exist within native anatomy, thereby allowing proprioceptive signals from mechanoreceptors within both muscles to be communicated to the central nervous system. We surgically constructed two AMIs within the residual limb of a subject with a transtibial amputation. Each AMI sends control signals to one joint of a two-degree-of-freedom ankle-foot prosthesis and provides proprioceptive information pertaining to the movement of that joint. The AMI subject displayed improved control over the prosthesis compared to a group of four subjects having traditional amputation. We also show natural reflexive behaviors during stair ambulation in the AMI subject that do not appear in the cohort of subjects with traditional amputation. In addition, we demonstrate a system for closed-loop joint torque control in AMI subjects. These results provide a framework for integrating bionic systems with human physiology.

[1]  T.G. Sugar,et al.  SPARKy 3: Design of an active robotic ankle prosthesis with two actuated degrees of freedom using regenerative kinetics , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[2]  D. Burke,et al.  Perceptual responses to microstimulation of single afferents innervating joints, muscles and skin of the human hand. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  D. Winter,et al.  An integrated biomechanical analysis of normal stair ascent and descent. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  Muscle activation patterns during walking from transtibial amputees recorded within the residual limb-prosthetic interface , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  C. Jørgensen,et al.  Survival and function of auto- and homografts of adenohypophysial tissue in the toad, bufo bufo L. , 1956, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[7]  Aaron J. Young,et al.  Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Christopher E. Attinger,et al.  Outcomes After 294 Transtibial Amputations With the Posterior Myocutaneous Flap , 2014, The international journal of lower extremity wounds.

[9]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: a case study , 2007, The Lancet.

[10]  H. Herr,et al.  On prosthetic control: A regenerative agonist-antagonist myoneural interface , 2017, Science Robotics.

[11]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  G F Harris,et al.  "Guided" intramuscular fine wire electrode placement. A new technique. , 1996, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[14]  Victor Chang,et al.  Review and discussion: E-learning for academia and industry , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[15]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Nahorniak,et al.  Kinematic compensations as children reciprocally ascend and descend stairs with unilateral and bilateral solid AFOs. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[17]  J. Ochoa,et al.  Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  A. M. Smith The coactivation of antagonist muscles. , 1981, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[19]  A. M. Simon,et al.  Real-time myoelectric control of knee and ankle motions for transfemoral amputees. , 2011, JAMA.

[20]  Daniel Tan,et al.  Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  Michael Dimitriou,et al.  Human Muscle Spindle Sensitivity Reflects the Balance of Activity between Antagonistic Muscles , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  W. Edwards,et al.  Effect of joint stiffness on standing stability. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[23]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  An Experimental Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis Using Proportional Myoelectric Control , 2014 .

[24]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[25]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  L. Jami Golgi tendon organs in mammalian skeletal muscle: functional properties and central actions. , 1992, Physiological reviews.

[27]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[28]  D. McCloskey,et al.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  On the viability of implantable electrodes for the natural control of artificial limbs: Review and discussion , 2012, Biomedical engineering online.

[30]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[31]  Hugh M Herr,et al.  A murine model of a novel surgical architecture for proprioceptive muscle feedback and its potential application to control of advanced limb prostheses , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[32]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  CLINICALLY PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF PATTERN RECOGNITION FOR MYOELECTRIC PROSTHESES , 2008 .

[33]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems , 2005, Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS.

[35]  Scott M Lephart,et al.  The Sensorimotor System, Part II: The Role of Proprioception in Motor Control and Functional Joint Stability. , 2002, Journal of athletic training.

[36]  S. Sienko Thomas,et al.  Stair locomotion in children with spastic hemiplegia: the impact of three different ankle foot orthosis (AFOs) configurations. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[37]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Translational Motion Tracking of Leg Joints for Enhanced Prediction of Walking Tasks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Joseph M Czerniecki,et al.  Co-contraction patterns of trans-tibial amputee ankle and knee musculature during gait , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[40]  Elliott J. Rouse,et al.  Estimation of Human Ankle Impedance During the Stance Phase of Walking , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[41]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered Ankle--Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[42]  Z T Irwin,et al.  Chronic recording of hand prosthesis control signals via a regenerative peripheral nerve interface in a rhesus macaque. , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[43]  J. Gerring A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[44]  G.S. Dhillon,et al.  Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[45]  Alena M. Grabowski,et al.  Bionic ankle–foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. , 2009, JAMA.

[47]  I. Carlsson,et al.  Forearm amputees' views of prosthesis use and sensory feedback. , 2015, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[48]  D. Burke,et al.  Responses to passive movement of receptors in joint, skin and muscle of the human hand. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[49]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Continuous Locomotion-Mode Identification for Prosthetic Legs Based on Neuromuscular–Mechanical Fusion , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  I. A. Boyd,et al.  Proprioceptive discharges from stretch‐receptors in the knee‐joint of the cat , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[51]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[52]  K. Horch,et al.  Object Discrimination With an Artificial Hand Using Electrical Stimulation of Peripheral Tactile and Proprioceptive Pathways With Intrafascicular Electrodes , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[53]  G. Eklund Position sense and state of contraction; the effects of vibration , 1972 .

[54]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[55]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[56]  S. Skoglund Anatomical and physiological studies of knee joint innervation in the cat. , 1956, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[57]  R. Riener,et al.  Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[58]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  The Illusion of Owning a Third Arm , 2011, PloS one.

[59]  S. Gandevia,et al.  The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. , 2012, Physiological reviews.

[60]  E. Ribot-Ciscar,et al.  Ago-antagonist muscle spindle inputs contribute together to joint movement coding in man , 1998, Brain Research.

[61]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[62]  Nicholas B Langhals,et al.  Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface Viability and Signal Transduction with an Implanted Electrode , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.