Testing the Non‐Unity of Rate Ratio under Inverse Sampling

Inverse sampling is considered to be a more appropriate sampling scheme than the usual binomial sampling scheme when subjects arrive sequentially, when the underlying response of interest is acute, and when maximum likelihood estimators of some epidemiologic indices are undefined. In this article, we study various statistics for testing non-unity rate ratios in case-control studies under inverse sampling. These include the Wald, unconditional score, likelihood ratio and conditional score statistics. Three methods (the asymptotic, conditional exact, and Mid-P methods) are adopted for P-value calculation. We evaluate the performance of different combinations of test statistics and P-value calculation methods in terms of their empirical sizes and powers via Monte Carlo simulation. In general, asymptotic score and conditional score tests are preferable for their actual type I error rates are well controlled around the pre-chosen nominal level, and their powers are comparatively the largest. The exact version of Wald test is recommended if one wants to control the actual type I error rate at or below the pre-chosen nominal level. If larger power is expected and fluctuation of sizes around the pre-chosen nominal level are allowed, then the Mid-P version of Wald test is a desirable alternative. We illustrate the methodologies with a real example from a heart disease study.

[1]  K J Lui.  Sample size for the exact conditional test under inverse sampling. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  David A. Kikuchi,et al.  Inverse Sampling in Case Control Studies Involving a Rare Exposure , 1987 .

[3]  C H Fox,et al.  Quantitative analysis of mononuclear cells expressing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in esophageal mucosa , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[4]  M. Christman,et al.  Inverse Adaptive Cluster Sampling , 2001, Biometrics.

[5]  Kenneth Liu,et al.  Confidence intervals for an exposure adjusted incidence rate difference with applications to clinical trials , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  Kudô Alio,et al.  2×2 Tables emerging out of different grange mechanisms , 1978 .

[7]  K. Lui.  Point estimation on relative risk under inverse sampling , 1996 .

[8]  L. Madden,et al.  Plant disease incidence: inverse sampling, sequential sampling, and confidence intervals when observed mean incidence is zero , 1996 .

[9]  K. Lui.  A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Five Interval Estimators for the Relative Risk in Sparse Data , 2006, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[10]  H. O. Lancaster,et al.  Significance Tests in Discrete Distributions , 1961 .

[11]  K. Lui.  Confidence limits for the population prevalence rate based on the negative binomial distribution. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Kung-Jong Lui,et al.  Statistical Estimation of Epidemiological Risk , 2004 .

[13]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[14]  K. Lui,et al.  Exact equivalence test for risk ratio and its sample size determination under inverse sampling. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  K. Lui.  Confidence intervals for the risk ratio in cohort studies under inverse sampling , 1995 .

[16]  H. O. Lancaster.  Statistical control of counting experiments , 1952 .

[17]  K. Lui.  Five Confidence Intervals of the Closed Population Size in the Capture‐recapture Problem under Inverse Sampling with Replacement , 2004 .

[18]  G. Seber,et al.  A general inverse sampling scheme and its application to adaptive cluster sampling , 2004 .

[19]  John C. W. Rayner,et al.  The asymptotically optimal tests , 1997 .

[20]  J. B. S. Haldane,et al.  On a method of estimating frequencies. , 1945 .

[21]  Kung-Jong Lui,et al.  Asymptotic conditional test procedures for relative difference under inverse sampling , 2000 .

[22]  Kung-Jong Lui,et al.  Notes on Confidence Limits for the Odds Ratio in Case‐Control Studies under Inverse Sampling , 1996 .