Social embeddedness and relations of regard

Abstract While it is useful to qualify the embeddedness of alternative food networks with relation to marketness and instrumentalism, the evidence of strong inter-personal ties within transactions conducted by small food producers and their customers requires better conceptualization. Following Offer (Econ. Hist. Rev. L 3 (1997) 450) and Lee (Geoforum 31 (2000) 137) this paper uses the notion of relations of regard to illustrate the benefits to both parties arising from their interaction that go well beyond narrowly financial evaluations. The term “good food” is deployed for its capacity to convey the multiple attributes of products as well as to capture a heterogeneous set of actors broadly sharing a common set of values around food. Drawing upon interviews with producers and other key individuals within the region, the paper describes some of the issues affecting the organic farming and food artisan sectors, as well as their respective use of different food supply chains. The growth of face-to-face transactions has stimulated the development of markets in the region, which are considered for their status as oppositional sites to the mainstream food industry. Finally, the source of strong moral values that permeates the network is considered in relation to an important food personality.

[1]  Moya Kneafsey,et al.  Product and Place , 1998 .

[2]  Gianluca Brunori,et al.  Synergy and coherence through collective action : Some insights from wine routes in Tuscany , 2000 .

[3]  A. Offer Between the gift and the market: the economy of regard , 1997 .

[4]  P. McDonagh,et al.  Food chains, small‐scale food enterprises and rural development: Illustrations from Ireland , 1999 .

[5]  Moya Kneafsey,et al.  Reading the space of the farmers' market: a preliminary investigation from the UK. , 2000 .

[6]  Moya Kneafsey,et al.  Niche Markets and Regional Speciality Food Products in Europe: Towards a Research Agenda , 1999 .

[7]  C. Hinrichs,et al.  Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market☆ , 2000 .

[8]  J. Murdoch,et al.  Quality, Nature, and Embeddedness: Some Theoretical Considerations in the Context of the Food Sector* , 2000 .

[9]  H. Tovey Food, environmentalism and rural sociology: on the organic farming movement in Ireland , 1997 .

[10]  E. Barham Social movements for sustainable agriculture in France: A polanyian perspective , 1997 .

[11]  Carol Morris,et al.  `Seed to shelf', `teat to table', `barley to beer’ and `womb to tomb': discourses of food quality and quality assurance schemes in the UK , 2000 .

[12]  Moya Kneafsey,et al.  Producer constructions of quality in regional speciality food production : a case study from south west England , 2000 .

[13]  Roger Lee Shelter from the storm? Geographies of regard in the worlds of horticultural consumption and production , 2000 .

[14]  G. Feenstra Local food systems and sustainable communities , 1997 .

[15]  Richard O'Doherty,et al.  DIY Culture and Extended Milieux: LETS, Veggie Boxes and Festivals , 1997 .

[16]  G. Bristow,et al.  Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. , 2000 .

[17]  S. Whatmore,et al.  The business of place: networks of property, partnership and produce. , 2000 .

[18]  L. Thorne Local Exchange Trading Systems in the United Kingdom: A Case of Re-Embedding? , 1996 .

[19]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.