Automatic detection of oestrus and health disorders using data from electronic sow feeders

Abstract This article suggests a method for detecting oestrus, lameness and other health disorders for group housed sows fed by electronic sow feeders (ESF). The detection method is based on the measure of the individual eating rank, modeled using a univariate dynamic linear model. Differences between the predicted values of the model and the observations are monitored using a control chart: a V-mask is applied on the cumulative sum of the standardized forecast errors of the model. According to the respective V-mask parameters, alarms are given for each of the three states (oestrus, lameness, others) when the deviations between model predicted values and observations exceed some defined parameters. External information is incorporated into the model to limit the number of false alarms when a subgroup of sows enters and exits a group or both. The detection method was implemented on data collected within three production herds over 12 months. Visual recordings were performed to identify sows in oestrus or with health disorders. The detection method showed a high specificity. For oestrus detection, there was a sensitivity of 59%, 70% and 75% for the three herds as compared to 9% (herd 1) and 20% (herd 2) using lists of sows as alarms. Monitoring lameness results in a sensitivity of 56%, 70% and 41%, vs. 39%, 32% and 22% using the lists; monitoring other health disorders resulted in a sensitivity of 0%, 75% and 39% for the three respective herds, vs. 34% and 16% for herds 2 and 3 using the lists. To limit the number of false alarms, it is suggested to expand the model by including daily feed intake or body activity as other response variables.

[1]  J. Eddison,et al.  Variability in feeding behaviour of group-housed sows using electronic feeders , 1995 .

[2]  Michael A. West,et al.  Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (2nd edn) , 1997, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  V. E. Beattie,et al.  Influence of Social Status on the Welfare of Sows in Static and Dynamic Groups , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[4]  M. West,et al.  Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models , 1989 .

[5]  Friend Dw,et al.  Self-selection of feeds and water by unbred gilts. , 1973 .

[6]  S. Edwards,et al.  Effects of feed station design on the behaviour of group-housed sows using an electronic individual feeding system , 1988 .

[7]  Iver Thysen,et al.  Monitoring Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Counts by a Multi-Process Kalman Filter , 1993 .

[8]  Richard M. Sibly,et al.  Social hierarchy and feeder access in a group of 20 sows using a computer-controlled feeder , 1988 .

[9]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 1986 .

[10]  T. Heiskanen,et al.  Automated oestrus detection method for group housed sows using acceleration measurements , 2007 .

[11]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  Automated oestrus detection methods in group housed sows: Review of the current methods and perspectives for development , 2006 .

[12]  Anders Ringgaard Kristensen,et al.  Modelling the drinking patterns of young pigs using a state space model , 2005 .

[13]  U. Tasch,et al.  The development of a SoftSeparator for a lameness diagnostic system , 2004 .

[14]  H.P.M. Bressers,et al.  Monitoring individual sows: radiotelemetrically recorded ear base temperature changes around farrowing , 1994 .

[15]  D. S Arey,et al.  Time course for the formation and disruption of social organisation in group-housed sows , 1999 .

[16]  S. Edwards,et al.  Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production , 1998 .

[17]  Sandra A. Edwards Alternative housing for dry sows: system studies or component analysis? , 2000 .

[18]  J. A. Fernandez,et al.  The science and practice of pig production , 1995 .

[19]  G. C. Emmans,et al.  Voluntary food intake and diet selection. , 1999 .

[20]  K. H. Jensen,et al.  Management factors affecting activity and aggression in dynamic group-housing systems with electronic sow feeding: a field trial. , 2000 .

[21]  H.P.M. Bressers,et al.  Feeding order of sows at an individual electronic feed station in a dynamic group-housing system , 1993 .

[22]  Thomas Algot Søllested Automatic oestrus detection by modelling eating behaviour of group-housed sows in electronic sow feeding systems , .

[23]  D W Friend,et al.  Self-selection of feeds and water by unbred gilts. , 1973, Journal of animal science.

[24]  G. H. Kroeze,et al.  Results of a multivariate approach to automated oestrus and mastitis detection , 1997 .

[25]  Anders Ringgaard Kristensen,et al.  A model for monitoring the condition of young pigs by their drinking behaviour , 2005 .

[26]  Colin T. Whittemore,et al.  The science and practice of pig production , 1995 .

[27]  Rony Geers,et al.  Measurement of ear base temperature as a tool for sow management , 1996 .

[28]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[29]  G. H. Kroeze,et al.  Description of a detection model for oestrus and diseases in dairy cattle based on time series analysis combined with a Kalman filter , 1999 .

[30]  Sandra A. Edwards,et al.  Effects of food level on performance and behaviour of sows in a dynamic group-housing system with electronic feeding , 1997 .

[31]  H.P.M. Bressers,et al.  Monitoring individual sows in group-housing: possibilities for automation. , 1993 .