Household Adoption of Water-Efficient Equipment: The Role of Socio-Economic Factors, Environmental Attitudes and Policy

Using survey data of around 10,000 households from 10 OECD countries, we identify the driving factors of household adoption of water-efficient equipment by estimating Probit models of a household’s probability to invest in such equipment. The results indicate that environmental attitudes and ownership status are strong predictors of adoption of water-efficient equipment. In terms of policy, we find that households that were both metered and charged for their water individually had a much higher probability to invest in water-efficient equipment compared to households that paid a flat fee.

[1]  Fernando Arbués,et al.  Estimation of residential water demand: a state-of-the-art review , 2003 .

[2]  Jessica L. Lowrey,et al.  Residential Water Demand Management: Lessons from Aurora, Colorado 1 , 2008 .

[3]  San-Pui Lam,et al.  Predicting Intentions to Conserve Water From the Theory of Planned Behavior, Perceived Moral Obligation, and Perceived Water Right1 , 1999 .

[4]  J. D. Khazzoom,et al.  Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances , 1980 .

[5]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study , 2002 .

[6]  S. Navrud,et al.  Internet CV surveys – a cheap, fast way to get large samples of biased values? , 2008 .

[7]  Charles D. Samuelson,et al.  The Impact of Personal Metering in the Management of a Natural Resource Crisis: A Social Dilemma Analysis , 1999 .

[8]  M. García-valiñas,et al.  Measuring welfare losses from interruption and pricing as responses to water shortages: an application to the case of Seville , 2007 .

[9]  P. Berkhout,et al.  Defining the rebound effect , 2000 .

[10]  Kenichi Mizobuchi,et al.  An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs , 2008 .

[11]  H. Campbell,et al.  Prices, Devices, People, or Rules: The Relative Effectiveness of Policy Instruments in Water Conservation1 , 2004 .

[12]  A. Worthington,et al.  A state of the art review of residential water demand modelling , 2006 .

[13]  San-Pui Lam Predicting Intention to Save Water: Theory of Planned Behavior, Response Efficacy, Vulnerability, and Perceived Efficiency of Alternative Solutions , 2006 .

[14]  Chi-Keung Woo Managing water supply shortage Interruption vs. pricing , 1994 .

[15]  R. Berk,et al.  Measuring the impact of water conservation campaigns in California , 1993 .

[16]  S. Sorrell,et al.  The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions , 2008 .

[17]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Price and Income Elasticities of Residential Water Demand: A Meta-Analysis , 2003, Land Economics.

[18]  R. Brännlund,et al.  Increased Energy Efficiency and the Rebound Effect: Effects on consumption and emissions , 2004 .

[19]  M. Oliver Attitudes and Inaction A Case Study of the Manifest Demographics of Urban Water Conservation , 1999 .

[20]  S. Barr,et al.  Behavioural attitudes towards water saving? Evidence from a study of environmental actions , 2006 .

[21]  Richard D. Green,et al.  Do Residential Water Demand Side Management Policies Measure Up? An Analysis of Eight California Water Agencies , 2000 .

[22]  C. Seligman,et al.  The Evaluation of Information Campaigns to Promote Voluntary Household Water Conservation , 2000 .

[23]  Sheila M. Olmstead,et al.  The Value of Scarce Water: Measuring the Inefficiency of Municipal Regulations , 2006 .

[24]  M. Espey,et al.  Price elasticity of residential demand for water: A meta‐analysis , 1997 .

[25]  Nancy Ellen Kiernan,et al.  Is a Web Survey as Effective as a Mail Survey? A Field Experiment Among Computer Users , 2005 .

[26]  A. Nesdale,et al.  The Effects of Appraised Severity and Efficacy in Promoting Water Conservation: An Informational Analysis , 1983 .

[27]  R. Sutherland Market Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Investments , 1991 .

[28]  M. Renwick,et al.  Demand Side Management Policies for Residential Water Use: Who Bears the Conservation Burden? , 1998 .

[29]  M. Einhorn,et al.  Notes - Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency Standards for Household Appliances , 1982 .

[30]  Christopher M. Fleming,et al.  Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  W. Patterson Energy policy , 1978, Nature.

[32]  Michael B. Ward,et al.  Prices Versus Rationing: Marshallian Surplus and Mandatory Water Restrictions , 2008 .

[33]  David Saurií,et al.  Lights and Shadows of Urban Water Demand Management: The Case of the Metropolitan Region of Barcelona , 2003 .

[34]  Runa Nesbakken,et al.  Energy Consumption for Space Heating: A Discrete-Continuous Approach , 2001 .

[35]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables , 1979 .

[36]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[37]  Graeme C. Dandy,et al.  Estimating Residential Water Demand in the Presence of Free Allowances , 1997 .

[38]  Clifford S. Russell,et al.  Environmental labeling and consumers' choice--an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan , 2004 .

[39]  D. Saurí,et al.  Urbanisation and Water Consumption: Influencing Factors in the Metropolitan Region of Barcelona , 2006 .

[40]  Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh,et al.  Environmental regulation of households: An empirical review of economic and psychological factors , 2008 .

[41]  Céline Nauges,et al.  Privately-Operated Water Utilities, Municipal Price Negotiation, and Estimation of Residential Water Demand: The case of France , 2000 .