Learning in combined-feature search: Specificity to orientation

We investigated the dynamics and specificity of learning in the search for a target defined by combined features belonging to the same dimension (a rotated L) among homogeneous or heterogeneous distractors (differently rotated Ls). We found that learning makes searching faster although the search strategy does not change, remaining parallel with homogeneous distractors and serial with heterogeneous distractors. Learning was found to be specific for combined-feature orientation, although simple features did not change in the transfer stimulus: Transfer was partial when either the target or the distractors were rotated (so that their global orientation became the same) and totally absent when target and distractors were swapped. These results, which apply to searches among both homogeneous and heterogeneous distractors, rule out the possibility that learning is specific for orientation of just simple features. Instead, the results suggest that specificity of learning with combined features reflects the activation of junction detectors responding to a combined feature of a particular orientation.

[1]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Limitations on the Parallel Guidance of Visual Search : Color x Color and Orientation x Orientation Conjuctions , 2004 .

[4]  F. Attneave,et al.  The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory , 1949 .

[5]  Amanda Ellison,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search: Some evidence of specificities , 1998, Vision Research.

[6]  A. Treisman,et al.  Automaticity and preattentive processing. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  G. Westheimer,et al.  The effect of training on visual alignment discrimination and grating resolution , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Learning Pop-out Detection: Specificities to Stimulus Characteristics , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  B. Julesz,et al.  Detection versus Discrimination of Visual Orientation , 1984, Perception.

[10]  H. Nothdurft.  Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  B. Julesz,et al.  Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[12]  M. Fahle.  Specificity of learning curvature, orientation, and vernier discriminations , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Silverman,et al.  Spatial frequency columns in primary visual cortex. , 1981, Science.

[14]  Ruxandra Sireteanu,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search: Fast, enduring, but non-specific , 1995, Vision Research.

[15]  M. Mayer.  Practice improves adults' sensitivity to diagonals , 1983, Vision Research.

[16]  Stierlin.  Organization of Behavior. A Neuropsychological Theory , 1953 .

[17]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M Carrasco,et al.  “Transient structures”: The effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[21]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Detection and identification of moving targets , 1983, Vision Research.

[22]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[23]  S. Edelman,et al.  Long-term learning in vernier acuity: Effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback , 1993, Vision Research.

[24]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Learning in grating waveform discrimination: Specificity for orientation and spatial frequency , 1981, Vision Research.

[25]  C Casco,et al.  Spatial interactions in simple and combined-feature visual search. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[26]  H. Pashler,et al.  Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[28]  S. Kastner,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Pop-out in Cat Striate Cortex , 1997, Vision Research.

[29]  D. Hubel,et al.  Regular patchy distribution of cytochrome oxidase staining in primary visual cortex of macaque monkey , 1981, Nature.

[30]  V. Walsh,et al.  Perceptual Learning in Visual Conjunction Search , 1998, Perception.

[31]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[32]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[33]  F. Crick.  Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  S. McKee,et al.  Improvement in vernier acuity with practice , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[36]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[37]  D. Levi,et al.  Perceptual learning in parafoveal vision , 1995, Vision Research.

[38]  Hans-Christoph Nothdurft,et al.  Different approaches to the coding of visual segmentation , 1997 .

[39]  K. D. Valois.  Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity , 1977, Vision Research.

[40]  G. Orban,et al.  The effect of practice on the oblique effect in line orientation judgments , 1985, Vision Research.

[41]  D. Glaser,et al.  Initial performance, learning and observer variability for hyperacuity tasks , 1993, Vision Research.

[42]  B. S. Rubenstein,et al.  Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[43]  G. Campana,et al.  Stimulus-specific dynamics of learning in conjunction search tasks , 2001 .

[44]  D. Levi,et al.  Perceptual learning in vernier acuity: What is learned? , 1995, Vision Research.

[45]  J. Braun.  On the detection of salient contours. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[46]  H. J. Muller,et al.  SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination , 1987, Vision Research.