Specific Growth Rate Determines the Sensitivity of Escherichia coli to Lactic Acid Stress: Implications for Predictive Microbiology

This study tested the hypothesis that sensitivity of Escherichia coli to lactic acid at concentrations relevant for fermented sausages (pH 4.6, 150 mM lactic acid, a w = 0.92, temperature = 20 or 27°C) increases with increasing growth rate. For E. coli strain 683 cultured in TSB in chemostat or batch, subsequent inactivation rates when exposed to lactic acid stress increased with increasing growth rate at harvest. A linear relationship between growth rate at harvest and inactivation rate was found to describe both batch and chemostat cultures. The maximum difference in T90, the estimated times for a one-log reduction, was 10 hours between bacteria harvested during the first 3 hours of batch culture, that is, at different growth rates. A 10-hour difference in T90 would correspond to measuring inactivation at 33°C or 45°C instead of 37°C based on relationships between temperature and inactivation. At similar harvest growth rates, inactivation rates were lower for bacteria cultured at 37°C than at 15–20°C. As demonstrated for E. coli 683, culture conditions leading to variable growth rates may contribute to variable lactic acid inactivation rates. Findings emphasize the use and reporting of standardised culture conditions and can have implications for the interpretation of data when developing inactivation models.

[1]  S. Pirt Introductory lecture. Prospects and problems in continuous flow culture of micro-organisms , 1972 .

[2]  R. Lindqvist,et al.  Inactivation of Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and Yersinia enterocolitica in fermented sausages during maturation/storage. , 2009, International journal of food microbiology.

[3]  J. Ryu,et al.  Tolerance of acid‐adapted and non‐adapted Escherichia coli O157:H7 cells to reduced pH as affected by type of acidulant , 1999, Journal of applied microbiology.

[4]  Thomas Egli,et al.  Specific growth rate and not cell density controls the general stress response in Escherichia coli. , 2004, Microbiology.

[5]  R. Lindqvist,et al.  Time to growth and inactivation of three STEC outbreak strains under conditions relevant for fermented sausages. , 2011, International journal of food microbiology.

[6]  G. Bennett,et al.  Mechanisms of acid resistance in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[7]  T. Ross,et al.  Temperature governs the inactivation rate of vegetative bacteria under growth-preventing conditions. , 2008, International journal of food microbiology.

[8]  J. J. Semanchek,et al.  Influence of growth temperature on inactivation and injury of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by heat, acid, and freezing. , 1998, Journal of food protection.

[9]  Thomas Egli,et al.  Specific Growth Rate Determines the Sensitivity of Escherichia coli to Thermal, UVA, and Solar Disinfection , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  T. Ross,et al.  Effect of suspension media on nonthermal inactivation of Escherichia coli , 2006, Letters in applied microbiology.

[11]  A. Yamaguchi,et al.  Indole enhances acid resistance in Escherichia coli. , 2010, Microbial pathogenesis.

[12]  Annik Nanchen,et al.  Nonlinear Dependency of Intracellular Fluxes on Growth Rate in Miniaturized Continuous Cultures of Escherichia coli , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  T. Ross,et al.  Quantification of the Relative Effects of Temperature, pH, and Water Activity on Inactivation of Escherichia coli in Fermented Meat by Meta-Analysis , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  J. Luchansky,et al.  Viability of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in salami following conditioning of batter, fermentation and drying of sticks, and storage of slices. , 1998, Journal of food protection.

[15]  S. Condón,et al.  Resistance of Escherichia coli grown at different temperatures to various environmental stresses , 2008, Journal of applied microbiology.

[16]  R. Hengge-aronis,et al.  Recent insights into the general stress response regulatory network in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Journal of molecular microbiology and biotechnology.

[17]  L. Duffy,et al.  Acid resistance of enterohaemorrhagic and generic Escherichia coli associated with foodborne disease and meat. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.

[18]  K. Suziedelis,et al.  Acid response of exponentially growing Escherichia coli K-12. , 2006, Microbiological research.

[19]  K. Yokoigawa,et al.  Acid tolerance and gad mRNA levels of Escherichia coli O157:H7 grown in foods. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[20]  R. Buchanan,et al.  pH-dependent stationary-phase acid resistance response of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in the presence of various acidulants. , 1999, Journal of food protection.

[21]  K. W. Arnold,et al.  Starvation- and stationary-phase-induced acid tolerance in Escherichia coli O157:H7 , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[22]  Allman Introductory Lecture , 1855, Edinburgh medical journal.

[23]  M. M. Benjamin,et al.  Acid tolerance of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[24]  John W. Foster,et al.  Escherichia coli acid resistance: tales of an amateur acidophile , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[25]  A H Geeraerd,et al.  GInaFiT, a freeware tool to assess non-log-linear microbial survivor curves. , 2005, International journal of food microbiology.

[26]  R. Buchanan,et al.  Culturing enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in the presence and absence of glucose as a simple means of evaluating the acid tolerance of stationary-phase cells , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[27]  T. Bergholz,et al.  Global transcriptional response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to growth transitions in glucose minimal medium , 2007, BMC Microbiology.

[28]  M. Doyle,et al.  Food as a vehicle for transmission of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. , 2007, Journal of food protection.