Performance indices in descriptive sensory analysis – A complimentary screening tool for assessor and panel performance

Abstract Many statistical methods exist for evaluation of different aspects of assessor and panel performance. In order to gain a realistic and exhaustive overview over each individual’s performance in different areas a large number of statistical results or plots need to be considered. Such a process often can be time consuming, cumbersome and may lead to biased conclusions. The proposed performance indices framework aims to act as an effective and practical complementary screening tool for panel leaders to help them quickly detect off-performances by assessors. The framework provides performance indices in the three following areas: agreement, repeatability and discrimination. Performance indices for agreement and repeatability are based on computations of either RV or RV2 coefficients, while the discrimination index is based on results from one- and two-way ANOVA. The performance indices can be easily presented in tables or graphs. Results show that they effectively detect underperforming assessors, and in combination with influence plots, provide a useful first overall impression in a rapid manner. Detailed performance issues can then be studied further in more detail with established statistical methods for performance evaluation.

[1]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Group analysis in functional neuroimaging: selecting subjects using similarity measures , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[3]  Guido van Rossum,et al.  Python Programming Language , 2007, USENIX Annual Technical Conference.

[4]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Visualization of sensory profiling data for performance monitoring , 2007 .

[5]  Y. Escoufier LE TRAITEMENT DES VARIABLES VECTORIELLES , 1973 .

[6]  Sébastien Lê,et al.  Methodology for the comparison of sensory profiles provided by several panels: Application to a cross-cultural study , 2008 .

[7]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Interpreting sensory data by combining principal component analysis and analysis of variance , 2009 .

[8]  Conor M. Delahunty,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING PROCESS OF A SENSORY VOCABULARY FOR THE ODOR EVALUATION OF SELECTED DISTILLED BEVERAGES USING DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[9]  P. Robert,et al.  A Unifying Tool for Linear Multivariate Statistical Methods: The RV‐Coefficient , 1976 .

[10]  Patrick D. Gerard,et al.  COMPARISON OF LEXICONS FOR DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF WHEY AND SOY PROTEINS IN NEW ZEALAND AND THE U.S.A. , 2007 .

[11]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory and applications , 2007 .

[12]  John C. Castura,et al.  Use of feedback calibration to reduce the training time for wine panels , 2006 .

[13]  Sébastien Lê,et al.  SENSOMINER : A PACKAGE FOR SENSORY DATA ANALYSIS , 2008 .

[14]  Pascal Schlich,et al.  Defining and Validating Assessor Compromises About Product Distances and Attribute Correlations , 1996 .

[15]  Andreas Rytz,et al.  Training is a critical step to obtain reliable product profiles in a real food industry context , 2004 .

[16]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Identifying outlying assessors in sensory profiling using fuzzy clustering and multi-block methodology , 2009 .

[17]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Analysing sensory panel performance in a proficiency test using the PanelCheck software , 2009 .

[18]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Perceptual mapping of apples and cheeses using projective mapping and sorting. , 2010 .

[19]  Rosaria Romano,et al.  Correcting for different use of the scale and the need for further analysis of individual differences in sensory analysis , 2008 .

[20]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Some new tools for visualising multi-way sensory data , 2008 .

[21]  Eduard P. P. A. Derks,et al.  PANCA: panel concordance analysis. , 2010 .

[22]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Real-life metabolomics data analysis : how to deal with complex data ? , 2010 .

[23]  K. Ruben Gabriel,et al.  A permutation test of association between configurations by means of the rv coefficient , 1998 .

[24]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Detection and interpretation of variation within and between assessors in sensory profiling , 1991 .

[25]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[26]  Sylvie Chollet,et al.  Comparison of visual appearance and texture profiles of jellies in France and Vietnam and validation of attribute transfer between the two countries , 2008 .

[27]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Analysing Individual Profiles by Three-Way Factor Analysis , 1996 .

[28]  Michael Meyners,et al.  Permutation tests: are there differences in product liking? , 2001 .

[29]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Handling individual differences between assessors in sensory profiling , 1990 .

[30]  Martin Kermit,et al.  Assessing the performance of a sensory panel–panellist monitoring and tracking , 2005 .

[31]  Paul W. Mielke,et al.  34 Meteorological applications of permutation techniques based on distance functions , 1984, Nonparametric Methods.

[32]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Testing the significance of the RV coefficient , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[33]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Perceptual mapping of citrus juices using projective mapping and profiling data from culinary professionals and consumers , 2008 .

[34]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science , 2010 .

[35]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  Evaluation of French and New Zealand Sauvignon wines by experienced French wine assessors , 2010 .

[36]  Jean A. McEwan,et al.  Proficiency testing for sensory profile panels: measuring panel performance , 2002 .

[37]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses , 2009, Evolution & development.

[38]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  Comparison of conventional descriptive analysis and a citation frequency-based descriptive method for odor profiling: An application to Burgundy Pinot noir wines , 2010 .

[39]  Garmt Dijksterhuis,et al.  Assessing panel consonance , 1995 .

[40]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Measuring validity in sensory analysis , 1995 .