Personalized Engineering Education for the Twenty-First Century

With increasing globalization and twenty-first-century trends such as the personalization and commoditization of technology, individuals are required to refresh and adapt their competencies continuously and keep their knowledge current. The changing environment and the diverse learning needs of individuals require a change in the existing paradigm of engineering education. What is needed is a more flexible, learner-centric paradigm that, among other things, instills in individuals the habit of being self-directed lifelong learners. The proposed approach to addressing the changing needs of engineering education is based on mass customization. In this chapter, the development of this approach over the last decade is traced. Other foundational principles in this approach include focusing on competency-based learning rather than one-size-fits-all content delivery, shifting the role of the instructors to orchestrators of learning, shifting the role of students to active learners, shifting the focus from the lower cognitive levels of learning to the upper levels, creating learning communities, embedding flexibility in courses, leveraging diversity, making students aware of the learning process, scaffolding, and enabling students to make decisions where all information may not be available. In this chapter, an overview of the implementation of this approach in graduate-level engineering design courses is presented for courses offered in three different settings, (a) mass customization of content within a single course, (b) mass collaboration of students in distributed settings, and (c) jointly offered cross-institutional courses with distance learning students. The implementation details include technical themes for the different courses, the course architecture (activities and their interdependencies), the assignments, learning modules, team formation, end-of-semester deliverables, and self-assessment.

[1]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives , 2006 .

[2]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Mass-Customization: From Personalized Products to Personalized Engineering Education , 2012 .

[3]  Jitesh H. Panchal,et al.  Educating Engineers for the Near Tomorrow , 2012 .

[4]  Wm. A. Wulf,et al.  A Makeover for Engineering Education. , 2002 .

[5]  Karlynn Cory,et al.  Policymaker's Guide to Feed-in Tariff Policy Design , 2010 .

[6]  Eden Fisher,et al.  New Perspectives on Teaching Innovation to Engineers: An Exploration of Mental Models of Innovation Experts , 2011 .

[7]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Developing Competencies for the 21st Century Engineer , 2012 .

[8]  S. Switzer,et al.  It's A Flat World After All , 2012 .

[9]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance , 2006 .

[10]  C. Bao Iturbe,et al.  Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[11]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[12]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[13]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently , 2006 .

[14]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  Teaching students to learn : a student-centred approach , 1981 .

[15]  G. M. Warnick Global Competence: Its Importance For Engineers Working In A Global Environment , 2011 .

[16]  Jitesh H. Panchal,et al.  Innovative Design Education in a Global Distance Learning Setting , 2011 .

[17]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[18]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[19]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[20]  S. Kotha Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition , 1992 .

[21]  David F. Radcliffe,et al.  Innovation as a Meta-Attribute for Graduate Engineers* , 2005 .

[22]  Jitesh H. Panchal,et al.  Fostering Collaborative Learning and Educational Mass Customization in a Graduate Level Engineering Design Course , 2009 .

[23]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[24]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Identifying Dilemmas Embodied in 21st Century Engineering , 2012 .

[25]  T. Friedman The World Is Flat [Updated and Expanded]: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century , 2006 .

[26]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Managing Dilemmas Embodied in 21st Century Engineering , 2012 .

[27]  Thomas L. Friedman,et al.  Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution—And How It Can Renew America , 2008 .

[28]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION I. A VISION FOR A NEW CENTURY , 2000 .

[29]  Christopher B. Williams,et al.  Empowering Students to Learn How to Learn: Mass Customization of Graduate Engineering Design Course , 2006 .

[30]  Malcolm Allan,et al.  Achieving Engineering Competencies in the Global Information Society through the Integration of On-Campus and Workplace Environments , 2008 .

[31]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[32]  B. Zimmerman Development and Adaptation of Expertise: The Role of Self-Regulatory Processes and Beliefs. , 2006 .

[33]  J. Earnest ABET engineering technology criteria and competency based engineering education , 2005, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.

[34]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Competencies for Innovating in the 21st Century , 2012 .