An analysis of the effect of the bidirectional reflectance distribution function on remote sensing imagery accuracy from Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUASs) are increasingly being utilized for remote sensing applications due to their low-cost availability and potential for the collection of high-resolution on-demand aerial imagery. However, the field is still maturing, and there remains many questions on the accuracy and the validity of the data collected. While many researchers have investigated means of improving calibrations and data collection techniques, there are other sources of error that require investigation. In this paper, two unique characteristics of SUAS remote sensing are analyzed as potential sources of error: the use of wide field-of-view (FOV) imaging sensors and solar motion during one or more data collection flights. Both of these characteristics are related to the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF), a description of light reflection as a function of illumination direction and observer viewing angles. The wide FOV of many imaging equipment creates an inherent radial variation in viewing angle, and the solar motion creates a non-static illumination source. The results of this paper indicates that these two factors have significant contributions to errors and should not be assumed to be negligible.

[1]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Thermal and Narrowband Multispectral Remote Sensing for Vegetation Monitoring From an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Luis Alonso,et al.  Angular Dependency of Hyperspectral Measurements over Wheat Characterized by a Novel UAV Based Goniometer , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[3]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  PROSPECT-4 and 5: Advances in the leaf optical properties model separating photosynthetic pigments , 2008 .

[4]  YangQuan Chen,et al.  Optimal Collection of High Resolution Aerial Imagery with Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[5]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Sensor Correction of a 6-Band Multispectral Imaging Sensor for UAV Remote Sensing , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[6]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Angular sensitivity analysis of vegetation indices derived from CHRIS/PROBA data , 2008 .

[7]  C. Gueymard Parameterized transmittance model for direct beam and circumsolar spectral irradiance , 2001 .

[8]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Three-dimensional forest light interaction model using a Monte Carlo method , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Brandon Stark,et al.  A detailed field study of direct correlations between ground truth crop water stress and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[10]  YangQuan Chen,et al.  Remote Sensing Methodology for Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2016 .

[11]  Enric Pastor,et al.  UAV Flight Experiments Applied to the Remote Sensing of Vegetated Areas , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[12]  W. Verhoef,et al.  PROSPECT+SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization , 2009 .

[13]  Marek Ostrowski,et al.  Error simulations of uncorrected NDVI and DCVI during remote sensing measurements from UAS , 2014 .

[14]  H. Jones,et al.  Remote Sensing of Vegetation: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2010 .

[15]  Jose A. Jiménez-Berni,et al.  Pheno-Copter: A Low-Altitude, Autonomous Remote-Sensing Robotic Helicopter for High-Throughput Field-Based Phenotyping , 2014 .

[16]  Heikki Saari,et al.  Processing and Assessment of Spectrometric, Stereoscopic Imagery Collected Using a Lightweight UAV Spectral Camera for Precision Agriculture , 2013, Remote. Sens..