Physical performance and image optimization of megavoltage cone-beam CT.

Megavoltage cone-beam CT (MVCBCT) is the most recent addition to the in-room CT systems developed for image-guided radiation therapy. The first generation MVCBCT system consists of a 6 MV treatment x-ray beam produced by a conventional linear accelerator equipped with a flat panel amorphous silicon detector. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physical performance of MVCBCT in order to optimize the system acquisition and reconstruction parameters for image quality. MVCBCT acquisitions were performed with the clinical system but images were reconstructed and analyzed with a separate research workstation. The geometrical stability and the positioning accuracy of the system were evaluated by comparing geometrical calibrations routinely performed over a period of 12 months. The beam output and detector intensity stability during MVCBCT acquisition were also evaluated by analyzing in-air acquisitions acquired at different exposure levels. Several system parameters were varied to quantify their impact on image quality including the exposure (2.7, 4.5, 9.0, 18.0, and 54.0 MU), the craniocaudal imaging length (2, 5, 15, and 27.4 cm), the voxel size (0.5, 1, and 2 mm), the slice thickness (1, 3, and 5 mm), and the phantom size. For the reconstruction algorithm, the study investigated the effect of binning, averaging and diffusion filtering of raw projections as well as three different projection filters. A head-sized water cylinder was used to measure and improve the uniformity of MVCBCT images. Inserts of different electron densities were placed in a water cylinder to measure the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The spatial resolution was obtained by measuring the point-spread function of the system using an iterative edge blurring technique. Our results showed that the geometric stability and accuracy of MVCBCT were better than 1 mm over a period of 12 months. Beam intensity variations per projection of up to 35.4% were observed for a 2.7 MU MVCBCT acquisition. These variations did not cause noticeable reduction in the image quality. The results on uniformity suggest that the cupping artifact occurring with MVCBCT is mostly due to off-axis response of the detector and not scattered radiation. Simple uniformity correction methods were developed to nearly eliminate this cupping artifact. The spatial resolution of the baseline MVCBCT reconstruction protocol was approximately 2 mm. An optimized reconstruction protocol was developed and showed an improvement of 75% in CNR with a penalty of only 8% in spatial resolution. Using this new reconstruction protocol, large adipose and muscular structures were differentiated at an exposure of 9 MU. A reduction of 36% in CNR was observed on a larger (pelvic-sized) phantom. This study demonstrates that soft-tissue visualization with MVCBCT can be substantially improved with proper system settings. Further improvement is expected from the next generation MVCBCT system with an optimized megavoltage imaging beamline.

[1]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of patient dose from cone beam computed tomography on prostate IMRT using Monte Carlo simulation. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  T Bortfeld,et al.  Correction of scatter in megavoltage cone-beam CT , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Dimitre Hristov,et al.  SU‐FF‐I‐11: Site‐Specific Image‐Gain Calibration for MV CBCT , 2006 .

[4]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. , 2000, Medical physics.

[5]  J. Wong,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  S. Nill,et al.  Linac-integrated kV-cone beam CT: technical features and first applications. , 2006, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[8]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. , 2001, Medical physics.

[9]  Lingyun Chen,et al.  Spatial resolution properties in cone beam CT: a simulation study. , 2008, Medical physics.

[10]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Performance characterization of megavoltage computed tomography imaging on a helical tomotherapy unit. , 2005, Medical physics.

[12]  D. Jaffray,et al.  The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors. , 2004, Medical physics.

[13]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Megavoltage cone-beam CT: system description and clinical applications. , 2006, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[14]  Moyed Miften,et al.  IMRT planning and delivery incorporating daily dose from mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging. , 2007, Medical physics.

[15]  Shuichi Ozawa,et al.  A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems. , 2008, Medical physics.

[16]  Jean Pouliot,et al.  Low dose megavoltage cone beam computed tomography with an unflattened 4 MV beam from a carbon target. , 2008, Medical physics.

[17]  Moyed Miften,et al.  Patient dose and image quality from mega-voltage cone beam computed tomography imaging. , 2007, Medical physics.

[18]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. , 2005, Medical physics.

[20]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  Jean Pouliot,et al.  Correction of megavoltage cone-beam CT images for dose calculation in the head and neck region. , 2008, Medical physics.

[22]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[23]  S. Richard,et al.  A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[24]  David A Jaffray,et al.  The stability of mechanical calibration for a kV cone beam computed tomography system integrated with linear accelerator. , 2005, Medical physics.

[25]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: effects of image lag. , 1999, Medical physics.

[26]  Henrik Turbell,et al.  Cone-Beam Reconstruction Using Filtered Backprojection , 2001 .

[27]  Ping Xia,et al.  Patient dose considerations for routine megavoltage cone-beam CT imaging. , 2007, Medical physics.

[28]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  A performance comparison of flat-panel imager-based MV and kV cone-beam CT. , 2002, Medical physics.

[29]  R L Morin,et al.  A practical method to measure the MTF of CT scanners. , 1982, Medical physics.

[30]  Ping Xia,et al.  Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  K. Ruchala,et al.  Patient dose from megavoltage computed tomography imaging. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  E L Nickoloff,et al.  Measurement of the PSF for a CT scanner: appropriate wire diameter and pixel size. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  R. Ning,et al.  Three-dimensional point spread function measurement of cone-beam computed tomography system by iterative edge-blurring algorithm. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Ping Xia,et al.  Dose calculation using megavoltage cone-beam CT. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  Moyed Miften,et al.  Commissioning and clinical implementation of a mega-voltage cone beam CT system for treatment localization. , 2007, Medical physics.

[36]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[37]  G H Olivera,et al.  Calibration of a tomotherapeutic MVCT system. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Characterization of scattered radiation in kV CBCT images using Monte Carlo simulations. , 2006, Medical physics.

[39]  Ramesh R. Galigekere,et al.  Cone-beam reprojection using projection-matrices , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  A Fenster,et al.  X-ray scatter in megavoltage transmission radiography: physical characteristics and influence on image quality. , 1994, Medical physics.

[41]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam CT: evaluation by 2AFC tests in relation to physical performance metrics. , 2007, Medical physics.

[42]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Compensators for dose and scatter management in cone-beam computed tomography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[43]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Correction of megavoltage cone‐beam CT images of the pelvic region based on phantom measurements for dose calculation purposes , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[44]  Hazim Jaradat,et al.  The utility of megavoltage computed tomography images from a helical tomotherapy system for setup verification purposes. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[45]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Quality assurance of onboard megavoltage computed tomography imaging and target localization systems for on- and off-line image-guided radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[46]  Georg Rose,et al.  Image quality of flat-panel cone beam CT , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[47]  T. Mackie,et al.  Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  W A Kalender,et al.  System performance of multislice spiral computed tomography. , 2000, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[49]  J. Boone,et al.  An analytical edge spread function model for computer fitting and subsequent calculation of the LSF and MTF. , 1994, Medical physics.