Many-Objective Evolutionary Optimisation and Visual Analytics for Product Family Design

Product family design involves the development of multiple products that share common components, modules and subsystems, yet target different market segments and groups of customers. The key to a successful product family is the product platform—the common components, modules and subsystems—around which the family is derived. The fundamental challenge when designing a family of products is resolving the inherent trade-off between commonality and performance. If there is too much commonality, then individual products may not meet their performance targets; however, too little sharing restricts the economies of scale that can be achieved during manufacturing and production. Multi-objective evolutionary optimisation algorithms have been used extensively to address this trade-off and determine which variables should be common (i.e., part of the platform) and which should be unique in a product family. In this chapter, we present a novel approach based on many-objective evolutionary optimisation and visual analytics to resolve trade-offs between commonality and many performance objectives. We provide a detailed example involving a family of aircraft that demonstrates the challenges of solving a 10-objective trade-off between commonality and the nine performance objectives in the family. Future research directions involving the use of multi-objective optimisation and visual analytics for product family design are also discussed.

[1]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Platform Selection Under Performance Loss Constraints in Optimal Design of Product Families , 2002, DAC 2002.

[2]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[3]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  T. Simpson Methods for Optimizing Product Platforms and Product Families , 2006 .

[5]  D D Woods,et al.  Paradigms for intelligent decision support , 1986 .

[6]  Marco Farina,et al.  A fuzzy definition of "optimality" for many-criteria optimization problems , 2004, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[7]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  A Framework for Visually Interactive Decision-Making and Design Using Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization (VIDEO) , 2007 .

[8]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Product platform and product family design : methods and applications , 2010 .

[9]  Wei Chen Use of the Robust Concept Exploration Method to Facilitate the Design of a Family of Products: Methodologies and Applications , 1999 .

[10]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  The cost structure of sensemaking , 1993, INTERCHI.

[11]  Kevin Otto,et al.  MODULAR PLATFORM-BASED PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN , 2000 .

[12]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[13]  P. Reed,et al.  A computational scaling analysis of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms in long-term groundwater monitoring applications , 2007 .

[14]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Evolutionary Computation 2 : Advanced Algorithms and Operators , 2000 .

[15]  LancasterKelvin The Economics of Product Variety , 1990 .

[16]  David M. Anderson,et al.  Agile Product Development for Mass Customization: How to Develop and Deliver Products for Mass Customization, Niche Markets, JIT, Build-to-Order, and Flexible Manufacturing (Быстрая разработка продуктов для массовой ориентации на потребителя) , 1996 .

[17]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[18]  David W. Rosen,et al.  ON THE APPLICABILITY OF PRODUCT VARIETY DESIGN CONCEPTS TO AUTOMOTIVE PLATFORM COMMONALITY , 1998 .

[19]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[20]  Henri J. Thevenot,et al.  A comprehensive metric for evaluating component commonality in a product family , 2007, DAC 2006.

[21]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Handbook of Evolutionary Computation , 1997 .

[22]  Fernando G. Lobo,et al.  A parameter-less genetic algorithm , 1999, GECCO.

[23]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  A Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families , 2000 .

[24]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  On the convergence and diversity-preservation properties of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms , 2001 .

[25]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE COMPROMISE DECISION SUPPORT PROBLEM AND THE ADAPTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM , 1998 .

[26]  Matthew B. Parkinson,et al.  MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION IN PRODUCT PLATFORM DESIGN , 1999, DAC 1999.

[27]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Comparing state-of-the-art evolutionary multi-objective algorithms for long-term groundwater monitoring design , 2005 .

[28]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Balancing Commonality and Performance within the Concurrent Design of Multiple Products in a Product Family , 2001, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[29]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  The Design of Innovation: Lessons from and for Competent Genetic Algorithms , 2002 .

[30]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration , 2005 .

[31]  Utpal Roy,et al.  Simultaneous engineering : methodologies and applications , 1999 .

[32]  Tore Hundsnes,et al.  The management of complexity , 2000 .

[33]  Michael P. Martinez,et al.  Effective Product Family Design Using Physical Programming , 2002 .

[34]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  The Value of Online Adaptive Search: A Performance Comparison of NSGAII, epsilon-NSGAII and epsilonMOEA , 2005, EMO.

[35]  Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Design for mass customization by developing product family architecture , 1998 .

[36]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  A framework for Visually Interactive Decision-making and Design using Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization (VIDEO) , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[37]  O. Teytaud How entropy-theorems can show that approximating high-dim Pareto-fronts is too hard , 2006 .

[38]  P. Reed,et al.  Managing population and drought risks using many‐objective water portfolio planning under uncertainty , 2009 .

[39]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Introduction of a product family penalty function using physical programming , 2000 .

[40]  Alfred Inselberg,et al.  The plane with parallel coordinates , 1985, The Visual Computer.

[41]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Challenges in Visual Data Analysis , 2006, Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06).

[42]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Many-Objective Optimization: An Engineering Design Perspective , 2005, EMO.

[43]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A Variation-Based Method for Product Family Design , 2002 .

[44]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  On the Evolutionary Optimization of Many Conflicting Objectives , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[45]  G. D. Galsworth Smart, Simple Design: Using Variety Effectiveness to Reduce Total Cost and Maximize Customer Selection , 1994 .

[46]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  A Method for Architecting Product Platforms , 2000 .

[47]  T. Simpson,et al.  Conceptual design of a family of products through the use of the robust concept exploration method , 1996 .

[48]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Introduction of a product family penalty function using physical programming , 2000 .

[49]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[50]  Alan B. Flaschner Smart, simple design: Using variety effectiveness to reduce total cost and maximize customer selection , 1995 .

[51]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A comprehensive metric for evaluating component commonality in a product family , 2007 .

[52]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Combining Convergence and Diversity in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2002, Evolutionary Computation.

[53]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Product variety management : research advances , 1998 .

[54]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  An efficient decomposed multiobjective genetic algorithm for solving the joint product platform selection and product family design problem with generalized commonality , 2009 .

[55]  K. Lancaster The Economics of Product Variety: A Survey , 1990 .

[56]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Sources of structure in sensemaking , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[57]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Sensitivity-Based Commonality Strategy for Family Products of Mild Variation, with Application to Automotive Body Structures , 2002 .

[58]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices , 2000 .