A Multi-Agent View of Strategic Planning Using Group Support Systems and Artificial Intelligence

The strategic planning process is dynamic and complex. Including a Group Support System (GSS) in the problem-solving process can improve the content quality of the strategic plan by allowing increased participation by more members of the organization. However, it can also add to the complexity of the problem by increasing the quantity of textual information that can result from group activity. Added complexity increases cognitive overload and frustrations of those participants negotiating the contents of the strategic plan. This article takes a multi-agent view of the strategic planning process. It considers group participants as multiple agents concerned with the content quality of the strategic plan. The facilitator agent is responsible for guiding groups in the strategic plan construction process as well as for solving process problems such as cognitive overload. We introduce an AI Concept Categorizer agent, a software tool that supports the facilitator in addressing the process problem of cognitive overload associated with convergent group activities by synthesizing group textual output into conceptual clusters. The implementation of this tool reduces frustrations which groups encounter in the process of classifying textual output and provides more time for discussion of the concepts themselves. Because of the large amount of convergent activity necessary for strategic planning, the addition of the AI Concept Categorizer to the strategic planning process should increase the quality of the strategic plan and the buy-in of the participants in the strategic planning process.

[1]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[2]  Kevin Knight,et al.  Connectionist ideas and algorithms , 1990, CACM.

[3]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Generation and search of clustered files , 1978, TODS.

[4]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic Meeting System Experience at IBM , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Creating the Corporate Future: Plan or be Planned For , 1981 .

[6]  Brad Quinn Post,et al.  Building the business case for group support technology , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Group, sub-group and nominal group idea generation in an electronic meeting environment , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Richard P. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Group Decision Support System impact: Multi-methodological exploration , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Carolyn J. Crouch,et al.  An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[12]  J. Dalton,et al.  Artificial neural networks , 1991, IEEE Potentials.

[13]  Doug Vogel,et al.  Software to support business teams , 1992 .

[14]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Automatic concept classification of text from electronic meetings , 1994, CACM.

[15]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group, Sub-Group, and Nominal Group Idea Generation: New Rules for a New Media? , 1994 .

[17]  Leonard Michael Jessup,et al.  Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group Decision Support System* , 1991 .

[18]  Colin Eden,et al.  Evaluating Strategy — Its Role Within the Context of Strategic Control , 1993 .

[19]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Support Systems: New Perspectives , 1992 .

[20]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain , 1991 .

[21]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems: Results from the field , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[23]  Gerald Salton,et al.  Automatic text processing , 1988 .

[24]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[25]  K. J. Lynch,et al.  Generating, integrating, and activating thesauri for concept-based document retrieval , 1993, IEEE Expert.

[26]  R. Michalski,et al.  Learning from Observation: Conceptual Clustering , 1983 .

[27]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Collective computation in neuronlike circuits. , 1987, Scientific American.

[28]  K. Sycara,et al.  Reaching informed agreement in multispecialist cooperation , 1993 .

[29]  B. Everitt,et al.  Cluster Analysis (2nd ed). , 1982 .

[30]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[31]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors , 1990, MIS Q..

[32]  Karen Spärck Jones.  Notes and references on early automatic classification work , 1991, SIGF.

[33]  K. J. Lynch,et al.  Automatic construction of networks of concepts characterizing document databases , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[34]  Patrick K. Simpson,et al.  Artificial Neural Systems: Foundations, Paradigms, Applications, and Implementations , 1990 .

[35]  Karen Sparck Jones.  Automatic keyword classification for information retrieval , 1971 .

[36]  John R. Anderson,et al.  MACHINE LEARNING An Artificial Intelligence Approach , 2009 .