Continuous Wearable Monitoring Analytics Predict Heart Failure Hospitalization

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Implantable cardiac sensors have shown promise in reducing rehospitalization for heart failure (HF), but the efficacy of noninvasive approaches has not been determined. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of noninvasive remote monitoring in predicting HF rehospitalization. Methods: The LINK-HF study (Multisensor Non-invasive Remote Monitoring for Prediction of Heart Failure Exacerbation) examined the performance of a personalized analytical platform using continuous data streams to predict rehospitalization after HF admission. Study subjects were monitored for up to 3 months using a disposable multisensor patch placed on the chest that recorded physiological data. Data were uploaded continuously via smartphone to a cloud analytics platform. Machine learning was used to design a prognostic algorithm to detect HF exacerbation. Clinical events were formally adjudicated. Results: One hundred subjects aged 68.4±10.2 years (98% male) were enrolled. After discharge, the analytical platform derived a personalized baseline model of expected physiological values. Differences between baseline model estimated vital signs and actual monitored values were used to trigger a clinical alert. There were 35 unplanned nontrauma hospitalization events, including 24 worsening HF events. The platform was able to detect precursors of hospitalization for HF exacerbation with 76% to 88% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Median time between initial alert and readmission was 6.5 (4.2–13.7) days. Conclusions: Multivariate physiological telemetry from a wearable sensor can provide accurate early detection of impending rehospitalization with a predictive accuracy comparable to implanted devices. The clinical efficacy and generalizability of this low-cost noninvasive approach to rehospitalization mitigation should be further tested. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT03037710.

[1]  Michael Böhm,et al.  Fluid status telemedicine alerts for heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. , 2016, European heart journal.

[2]  H. Tsutsui [Candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity]. , 2007, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[3]  L. Stevenson,et al.  Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[4]  Karl Swedberg,et al.  Influence of Nonfatal Hospitalization for Heart Failure on Subsequent Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure , 2007, Circulation.

[5]  M. Borggrefe,et al.  Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring, Audible Patient Alerts, and Outcome in Patients With Heart Failure , 2011, Circulation.

[6]  L. Stevenson,et al.  Sustained efficacy of pulmonary artery pressure to guide adjustment of chronic heart failure therapy: complete follow-up results from the CHAMPION randomised trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[7]  V. Roger,et al.  Lifetime Costs of Medical Care After Heart Failure Diagnosis , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[8]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Sensitivity and positive predictive value of implantable intrathoracic impedance monitoring as a predictor of heart failure hospitalizations: the SENSE-HF trial. , 2011, European heart journal.

[9]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Yi Zhang,et al.  A Multisensor Algorithm Predicts Heart Failure Events in Patients With Implanted Devices: Results From the MultiSENSE Study. , 2017, JACC. Heart failure.

[11]  Josef Stehlik,et al.  Feasibility of personalized nonparametric analytics for predictive monitoring of heart failure patients using continuous mobile telemetry , 2013, Wireless Health.

[12]  C. Lau,et al.  Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring in Patients With Heart Failure: Correlation With Fluid Status and Feasibility of Early Warning Preceding Hospitalization , 2005, Circulation.

[13]  G. Ewald,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: A White Paper From the Heart Failure Society of America Scientific Statements Committee. , 2018, Journal of cardiac failure.

[14]  E. Heist,et al.  Analysis of different device-based intrathoracic impedance vectors for detection of heart failure events (from the Detect Fluid Early from Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring study). , 2014, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Implementation With Readmission and Mortality Outcomes in Heart Failure , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[16]  V. Roger,et al.  Understanding the Epidemic of Heart Failure: Past, Present, and Future , 2014, Current Heart Failure Reports.

[17]  I. Piña,et al.  Forecasting the Impact of Heart Failure in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association , 2013, Circulation. Heart failure.

[18]  J. Mott,et al.  Similarity-based modeling of aircraft flight paths , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[19]  Niranjan Chakravarthy,et al.  Design and performance of a multisensor heart failure monitoring algorithm: results from the multisensor monitoring in congestive heart failure (MUSIC) study. , 2012, Journal of cardiac failure.

[20]  Kipp W. Johnson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.