Sensitivity analysis of four crop water stress indices to ambient environmental conditions and stomatal conductance

Abstract Crop water stress indices (CWSIs) quantify plant water status based on measurement of plant temperature. The goal of CWSI formulation is to normalize measured leaf temperatures based on reference temperatures to remove sensitivity to ambient environmental conditions (e.g., air temperature, humidity, radiation), while retaining sensitivity to plant water status as reflected by stomatal conductance. This study sought to better understand the sensitivity of these temperatures to ambient environmental conditions, and ultimately how they influence various CWSIs. The surface energy balance was modeled to simulate the impacts of input parameter variation on leaf temperature and reference surface temperatures used to calculate four different CWSIs. The performance of the CWSIs were assessed based on their ability to maximize sensitivity to stomatal conductance while minimizing the relative sensitivity to ambient environmental conditions. The sensitivity analyses indicated that all four CWSIs performed poorly in shaded conditions, as they had relatively low sensitivity to stomatal conductance and were sensitive to all environmental parameters. Two CWSIs had high sensitivity to stomatal conductance, and low sensitivity to all environmental parameters except wind speed. None of CWSIs could remove sensitivity to all environmental parameters while retaining sensitivity to stomatal conductance.

[1]  Iván Francisco García-Tejero,et al.  Thermal imaging at plant level to assess the crop-water status in almond trees (cv. Guara) under deficit irrigation strategies , 2018, Agricultural Water Management.

[2]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[3]  G. Sorrentino,et al.  YIELD AND OIL QUALITY OF INTENSIVELY TRAINED TREES OF THREE CULTIVARS OF OLIVE (OLEA EUROPAEA L.) UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION REGIMES , 1999 .

[4]  H. Jones,et al.  Thermal infrared imaging of crop canopies for the remote diagnosis and quantification of plant responses to water stress in the field. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[5]  J. Minx,et al.  Climate Change 2014 : Synthesis Report , 2014 .

[6]  M. Saudreau,et al.  Structure is more important than physiology for estimating intracanopy distributions of leaf temperatures , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[7]  V. H. Durán-Zuazo,et al.  Response of citrus trees to deficit irrigation during different phenological periods in relation to yield, fruit quality, and water productivity , 2010 .

[8]  Sherwood B. Idso,et al.  Non-water-stressed baselines: A key to measuring and interpreting plant water stress , 1982 .

[9]  Marcel Fuchs,et al.  Infrared measurement of canopy temperature and detection of plant water stress , 1990 .

[10]  Hamlyn G. Jones,et al.  Use of infrared thermometry for estimation of stomatal conductance as a possible aid to irrigation scheduling , 1999 .

[11]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[12]  M. K. Nanda,et al.  Canopy Temperature-Based Water Stress Indices: Potential and Limitations , 2018 .

[13]  Yeonsook Heo,et al.  Sensitivity analysis methods for building energy models: Comparing computational costs and extractable information , 2016 .

[14]  Kyriacos Patatas.  Radiation , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  Wind speed and leaf boundary layer conductance variation within tree crown: Consequences on leaf-to-atmosphere coupling and tree functions , 1999 .

[16]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Canopy temperature variability as an indicator of crop water stress severity , 2006, Irrigation Science.

[17]  Robert H. Beede,et al.  Regulated deficit irrigation effects on yield, nut quality and water-use efficiency of mature pistachio trees , 2004 .

[18]  Alain Baille,et al.  The effects of contrasted deficit irrigation strategies on the fruit growth and kernel quality of mature almond trees. , 2009 .

[19]  S. Idso,et al.  Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator , 1981 .

[20]  Francesca Pianosi,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  Guo Yu Qiu,et al.  Estimation of Plant Transpiration by Imitation Leaf Temperature , 1996 .

[22]  Manfred Stoll,et al.  Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field: application to grapevine. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[23]  Jean-Pascal van Ypersele de Strihou.  Climate Change 2014 - Synthesis Report , 2015 .

[24]  Yafit Cohen,et al.  How sensitive is the CWSI to changes in solar radiation? , 2013 .

[25]  H. G. Jones,et al.  IMPROVEMENTS TO INFRA-RED THERMOMETRY FOR IRRIGATION SCHEDULING IN HUMID CLIMATES , 1997 .

[26]  R. Essery,et al.  Snowmelt in a Canadian Spruce Forest: A Sensitivity Study to the Canopy Cover , 2003 .

[27]  J. Hatfield,et al.  Effect of Wind on the Crop Water Stress Index Derived by Infrared Thermometry1 , 1983 .

[28]  Brent Stephens,et al.  A model of vegetated exterior facades for evaluation of wall thermal performance , 2013 .

[29]  H. Jones,et al.  Exploring thermal imaging variables for the detection of stress responses in grapevine under different irrigation regimes. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[30]  邱 国玉,et al.  Estimation of Plant Transpiration by Imitation Leaf Temperature : Theoretical consideration and field verification (I) , 1996 .

[31]  C. Piedallu,et al.  Multiscale computation of solar radiation for predictive vegetation modelling , 2007, Annals of Forest Science.