Teaching Strategies for Building Student Persistence on Challenging Tasks: Insights Emerging from Two Approaches to Teacher Professional Learning.

In recent years, the mathematics education research community has given increased focus to the use of cognitively demanding, challenging tasks and the demands placed on students and teachers by their use. In particular, there is evidence that a major issue is students' lack of persistence when working on such tasks. In this article, we report on two approaches to teacher professional learning in which the use of challenging tasks was the focus. In the first case, two full days of professional learning were followed by the opportunity to teach up to ten challenging tasks. In the second case, teachers observed three lessons built around challenging tasks taught by members of the project team. In both cases, teachers completed questionnaires about their perceptions of promising strategies for encouraging persistence on challenging tasks, prior to any professional learning input and following the teaching of the tasks and the observation of the lessons, respectively. Both groups also participated in focus group discussions about their experiences and insights that had emerged. Data from written responses and focus group discussions were analysed for themes. There was considerable similarity in teachers' suggestions prior to the two professional learning experiences, but also interesting differences afterwards. In this paper, we describe the professional learning approaches, illustrate the kinds of tasks involved, and discuss similarities and differences in the data within and between the two groups of teachers. We also discuss affordances and limitations of the two professional learning approaches.

[1]  Bruce Joyce,et al.  Improving Inservice Training: The Messages of Research. , 1980 .

[2]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[3]  Hilary Hollingsworth,et al.  Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth , 2002 .

[4]  H. Borko Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain , 2004 .

[5]  Leicha A. Bragg,et al.  Challenging mathematics tasks: What they are and how to use them , 2011 .

[6]  Jan Lokan,et al.  Teaching mathematics in Australia : results from the TIMSS 1999 video study , 2003 .

[7]  G. Pólya,et al.  How to Solve It. A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. , 1945 .

[8]  Demonstration lessons in mathematics education: teachers’ observation foci and intended changes in practice , 2013 .

[9]  Arlene L. Grierson,et al.  Seeing is believing: creating a catalyst for teacher change through a demonstration classroom professional development initiative , 2009 .

[10]  D. Clarke,et al.  Supporting Teachers in Choosing and Using Challenging Mathematics Tasks. , 2012 .

[11]  Peter Sullivan,et al.  Teaching with Tasks for Effective Mathematics Learning , 2012 .

[12]  L. West,et al.  How Coaches Can Maximize Student Learning , 2010 .

[13]  P. Campbell How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method , 2005 .

[14]  Karol L. Yeatts,et al.  Navigating Through Problem Solving and Reasoning in Grade 4 , 2004 .

[15]  Peter Sullivan,et al.  Teaching Mathematics: Using research-informed strategies , 2011 .

[16]  Stanley Pogrow,et al.  Teaching Thinking to At-Risk Students. , 1988 .

[17]  Mary Cavanagh,et al.  Navigating through Problem Solving and Reasoning in Grade 2 , 2004 .

[18]  Susan McKenney,et al.  Educational design research: the value of variety , 2006 .

[19]  M. Stein,et al.  Instructional Tasks and the Development of Student Capacity to Think and Reason: An Analysis of the Relationship between Teaching and Learning in a Reform Mathematics Project , 1996 .

[20]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics , 2013 .

[21]  S. Loucks-Horsley Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[22]  Mary Kay Stein,et al.  Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms , 1996 .

[23]  Karen A. Wilson,et al.  Teachers' Views of the Challenging Elements of a Task. , 2013 .

[24]  Peter SullivanMike,et al.  Supporting teachers in structuring mathematics lessons involving challenging tasks , 2015 .

[25]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures , 2009 .

[26]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[27]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  An introduction to educational design research , 2013 .

[28]  Margaret S. Smith,et al.  5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions , 2011 .

[29]  M. Megel,et al.  Research Design , 2019, Beiträge zur Landschafts- und Umweltplanung I Contributions to Landscape and Environmental Planning.

[30]  Helen Timperley,et al.  Reframing Teacher Professional Learning: An Alternative Policy Approach to Strengthening Valued Outcomes for Diverse Learners , 2008 .

[31]  Anne Garrison,et al.  Exploring Relationships Between Setting Up Complex Tasks and Opportunities to Learn in Concluding Whole-Class Discussions in Middle-Grades Mathematics Instruction , 2013 .

[32]  T. Wood What Does it Mean to Teach Mathematics Differently , 2002 .

[33]  Dwaine E. Clarke,et al.  Ten key principles from research for the professional development of mathematics teachers , 2007 .