Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations

Arguments about the existence of language-specific neural systems and particularly arguments about the independence of syntactic and semantic processing have recently focused on differences between the event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by violations of syntactic structure (e.g. the P600) and those elicited by violations of semantic expectancy (e.g. the N400). However, the scalp distribution of the P600 component elicited by syntactic violations appears to resemble that elicited by rare categorical events (ldquo;odd-balls”) in non-linguistic contexts, frequently termed the P3b. The relationship between the P600 and the P3b was explored by manipulating the grammaticality of sentences read for comprehension, as well as two factors known to influence P3b amplitude: odd-ball probability and event saliency. Oddball probability was manipulated by varying the frequency of morphosyntactic violations within blocks of sentences, and event saliency was manipulated by using two types of morphosyntactic violatio...

[1]  Higher functions of the nervous system. , 1956 .

[2]  F. Plum Handbook of Physiology. , 1960 .

[3]  H. Huynh,et al.  Estimation of the Box Correction for Degrees of Freedom from Sample Data in Randomized Block and Split-Plot Designs , 1976 .

[4]  P. Buser Higher functions of the nervous system. , 1976, Annual review of physiology.

[5]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[6]  E. Donchin Event-related Brain Potentials: A Tool in the Study of Human Information Processing , 1979 .

[7]  Henri Begleiter,et al.  Evoked Brain Potentials and Behavior , 1979, The Downstate Series of Research in Psychiatry and Psychology.

[8]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[9]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[10]  I. Fischler,et al.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[11]  E. Donchin Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[12]  W. Pritchard Psychophysiology of P300. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[14]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[15]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[16]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian , 1984 .

[17]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Johnson A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[19]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[20]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related potential asymmetries during the reading of sentences. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  R. Verleger Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  R. Johnson,et al.  Auditory and visual P300s in temporal lobectomy patients: evidence for modality-dependent generators. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[24]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[25]  Richard Hudson,et al.  Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites , 1990 .

[26]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Event-related brain potentials. , 1990 .

[27]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements , 1990 .

[28]  M. Rugg Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[29]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[30]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[32]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[33]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[34]  Robert Kluender,et al.  Subjacency as a processing phenomenon , 1993 .

[35]  J. Aitchinson The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[36]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech , 1993 .

[37]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Effects of aging on event-related brain potentials and reaction times in an auditory oddball task. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[38]  M. Kutas,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  M. Kutas In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects , 1993 .

[40]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Dissociation of Brain Activity Related to Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of Language , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Anja Hahne,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials While Encountering Semantic and Syntactic Constraint Violations , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  D. Gary Miller,et al.  1. Theoretical Prerequisites , 1994 .

[43]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[44]  M. Kutas,et al.  What Is Who Violating? A Reconsideration of Linguistic Violations in Light of Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1994 .

[45]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Refer-ential context and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[46]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. , 1994 .

[47]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[49]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological insights into the nature of the semantic deficit in Alzheimer's disease , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[51]  Vicka R. Corey,et al.  On the Language Specificity of the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Is the Syntactic Positive Shift a Member of the P300 Family? , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Thomas F. Mnte,et al.  Brain Activity Associated with Syntactic Incongruencies in Words and Pseudo-Words , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  R Kakigi,et al.  [Event-related brain potentials]. , 1997, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.