OPEN ETHICAL ISSUES IN DIGITAL FORENSIC SYSTEMS

Digital forensic systems collect, filter, process, store and distribute data, to facilitate the investigational-cum-organizational decision-making process, as expected of any typical information system. These specialized systems are used to establish and understand the specifics of electronic incidents, after which information gathered could then be used to accurately identify and reprimand the parties abusing such electronic infrastructures as well as to stop any similar future incidents. However, due to the relative infancy of the digital forensic discipline as a whole and a number of other contributory factors, these systems infringe on and defy a lot of norms that have become acceptable to both individuals and organizations. This paper seeks to highlight the open issues within the digital forensic systems development and implementation area that border on ethics. The study employed a method which collected secondary data from related publications and analysed them to identify valid recurrent points. Recommendations are subsequently provided to each of the issues identified, with the aim of keeping the discipline’s stability and stakeholders’ expectations balanced.

[1]  Nicole Beebe,et al.  Digital Forensic Research: The Good, the Bad and the Unaddressed , 2009, IFIP Int. Conf. Digital Forensics.

[2]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[3]  Blake J. Roessler,et al.  The Value of Privacy , 2004 .

[4]  Shao Ying Zhu,et al.  Privacy Impacts of Data Encryption on the Efficiency of Digital Forensics Technology , 2013, ArXiv.

[5]  Charles T. Scialfa,et al.  Age differences in trust and reliance of a medication management system , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Brian D. Carrier,et al.  File System Forensic Analysis , 2005 .

[7]  Gary C. Kessler,et al.  Computer Forensics: Principles and Practices , 2006 .

[8]  Jill Slay,et al.  Validation and verification of computer forensic software tools-Searching Function , 2009 .

[9]  Matthew Meyers,et al.  Computer Forensics: The Need for Standardization and Certification , 2004, Int. J. Digit. EVid..

[10]  Tranos Zuva,et al.  Open issues in cybercriminal profiling , 2017, 2017 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (NextComp).

[11]  Eoghan Casey,et al.  Handbook of Digital Forensics and Investigation , 2009 .

[12]  Angus M. Marshall.  Digital Forensics: Digital Evidence in Criminal Investigations , 2008 .

[13]  Chris K. Ridder.  Evidentiary Implications of Potential Security Weaknesses in Forensic Software , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Crime Forensics.

[14]  Simson L. Garfinkel,et al.  Digital forensics research: The next 10 years , 2010, Digit. Investig..

[15]  George M. Mohay,et al.  Computer and Intrusion Forensics , 2003 .

[16]  Julian Baggini,et al.  The Ethics Toolkit: A Compendium of Ethical Concepts and Methods , 2007 .

[17]  Tranos Zuva,et al.  Towards the Adoption of Software Engineering Principles for Assessing and Ensuring the Reliability of Digital Forensic Tools , 2017 .

[18]  Michael Sheetz.  Computer Forensics: An Essential Guide for Accountants, Lawyers, and Managers , 2007 .

[19]  Jill Slay,et al.  Digital forensics: exploring validation, verification & certification , 2005, First International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE'05).

[20]  Christian B. Miller.  THE CONDITIONS OF MORAL REALISM , 2009 .