Planning in Robot-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass

Properly selected port sites for robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) improve the efficiency and quality of these procedures. In clinical practice, surgeons select port locations using external anatomic landmarks to estimate a patient’s internal anatomy. This paper proposes an automated approach to port selection based on a preoperative image of the patient, thus avoiding the need to estimate internal anatomy. Using this image as input, port sites are chosen from a grid of surgeon-approved options by defining a performance measure for each possible port triad. This measure seeks to minimize the weighted squared deviation of the instrument and endoscope angles from their optimal orientations at each internal surgical site. This performance measure proves insensitive to perturbations in both its weighting factors and moderate intraoperative displacements of the patient’s internal anatomy. A validation study of this port site selection algorithm was also performed. Six cardiac surgeons dissected model vessels using the port triad selected by this algorithm with performance compared to dissection using a surgeon-selected port triad and a port triad template described by Tabaie et al., 1999. With the algorithm-selected ports, dissection speed increased by up to 43%( = 0 046) with less overall vessel trauma. Thus, this algorithmic approach to port site selection has important clinical implications for robot-assisted CABG which warrant further investigation.

[1]  Optimized Port Placement for the Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting using the da Vinci Robotic System , 2000, ISER.

[2]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting , 1997, Surgical Endoscop.

[3]  W. Boyd,et al.  Closed-chest coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart with the use of a computer-enhanced surgical robotic system. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Influence of direction of view, target‐to‐endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  W. Boyd,et al.  3-D image guidance for minimally invasive robotic coronary artery bypass. , 2000, The heart surgery forum.

[6]  M. Mack,et al.  Initial prospective multicenter clinical trial of robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Towards Dynamic Planning and Guidance of Minimally Invasive Robotic Cardiac Bypass Surgical Procedures , 2001, MICCAI.

[8]  A. Berrebi,et al.  Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  Dorian Selha BOSTON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Thesis DEXTERITY OPTIMIZATION THROUGH PORT PLACEMENT IN ROBOT- ASSISTED MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY by SHAUN , 2003 .

[10]  J. Reinbolt,et al.  Endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft (ECABG) procedure with robotic assistance. , 1999, The heart surgery forum.

[11]  Christopher R. Wagner,et al.  The role of force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[12]  U. Kappert,et al.  Development of Robotic Enhanced Endoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease , 2001, Circulation.

[13]  Ève Coste-Manière,et al.  Planning and Simulation of Robotically Assisted Minimal Invasive Surgery , 2000, MICCAI.

[14]  S Weghorst,et al.  Laparoscopic surgical simulator and port placement study. , 2000, Studies in health technology and informatics.