Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group Identification

In four studies, effects of self-perceived or public-perceived threats to group status or group distinctiveness on self-stereotyping (defined as similarity to prototypical in-group members) were investigated for people with high or low in-group identification. The main prediction was that high and low identifiers will respond differentially when their group's status or distinctiveness is threatened such that self-stereotyping is reduced for low identifiers but enhanced for high identifiers. Although the four studies investigated different comparison groups and different kinds of group threat, the results of all studies provided support for the prediction, and this was confirmed by a meta-analysis. This supports the authors' argument that the initial level of group identification determines whether group members are likely to set themselves apart from the rest of their group or to show group solidarity when their identity as group members is threatened.

[1]  John C. Turner,et al.  Stereotyping and Social Reality , 1994 .

[2]  Daniel L. Wann,et al.  Collective self‐esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial , 1994 .

[3]  van Knippenberg,et al.  The social dimension: Intergroup differences in group perceptions , 1984 .

[4]  M. Brewer.  The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[5]  K. Dion,et al.  The phenomenology of being a target of prejudice. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  M. Diehl.  The Minimal Group Paradigm: Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Findings , 1990 .

[7]  John C. Turner,et al.  Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness , 1984 .

[8]  N. Ellemers.  The Influence of Socio-structural Variables on Identity Management Strategies , 1993 .

[9]  Jacob M. Rabbie,et al.  Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations , 1988 .

[10]  C. Kelly.  Social Identity and Intergroup Perceptions in Minority-Majority Contexts , 1990 .

[11]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Superordinate goals and intergroup behaviour: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance , 1987 .

[12]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Intergroup Relations in a Hospital Setting: A Further Test of Social Identity Theory , 1986 .

[13]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students , 1996 .

[14]  K. Dion.  Women's reactions to discrimination from members of the same or opposite sex , 1975 .

[15]  A. Manstead,et al.  Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  A. Manstead,et al.  THE SOCIAL-CONTEXT OF STEREOTYPING AND DIFFERENTIATION , 1989 .

[17]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Effects of intergroup similarity on intergroup relations , 1993 .

[18]  B. Hayes,et al.  Context‐dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference , 1992 .

[19]  R. J. Brown.  The effects of intergroup similarity and cooperative vs. competitive orientation on intergroup discrimination , 1984 .

[20]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies , 1976 .

[21]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .

[22]  A. Mummendey,et al.  ‘Different‘ just means ‘better’: Some obvious and some hidden pathways to in‐group favouritism , 1984 .

[23]  Willem Koomen,et al.  WHEN BAD ISNT ALL BAD : STRATEGIC USE OF SAMPLE INFORMATION IN GENERALIZATION AND STEREOTYPING , 1995 .

[24]  Jacob M. Rabbie,et al.  Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model , 1989 .

[25]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. , 1990, The British journal of social psychology.

[26]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the 'contact hypothesis.' , 1986 .

[27]  Daniel L. Wann,et al.  Die-Hard and Fair-Weather Fans: Effects of Identification on BIRGing and CORFing Tendencies , 1990 .

[28]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[29]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. , 1993 .

[30]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. , 1991 .

[31]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[32]  Keith James,et al.  Dispositional Group Loyalty and Individual Action for the Benefit of an Ingroup: Experimental and Correlational Evidence , 1994 .

[33]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[34]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance , 1986 .

[35]  C. Kelly.  Intergroup differentiation in a political context , 1988 .

[36]  R. Spears.  Isolating the collective self , 1995 .

[37]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect , 1990 .

[38]  H. Tajfel.  The social dimension: Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology , 1984 .

[39]  B. Simon,et al.  Self-stereotyping and social context: the effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[41]  C. Judd,et al.  Social Categorization and the Representation of Variability Information , 1991 .

[42]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[43]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference , 1980 .

[44]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration , 1992 .

[45]  C. Kelly.  Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity , 1989 .