Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe the distribution of pelvic organ support in a gynecologic clinic population to define the clinical disease state of pelvic organ prolapse and to analyze its epidemiologic condition. STUDY DESIGN This was a multicenter observational study. Subjects who were seen at outpatient gynecology clinics who required an annual gynecologic examination underwent a pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination and completed a prolapse symptom questionnaire. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to define pelvic organ prolapse with the use of symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination measures. Standard age-adjusted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate various relationships. RESULTS The population consisted of 1004 women who were aged 18 to 83 years. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse quantification stages was 24% (stage 0), 38% (stage 1), 35% (stage 2), and 2% (stage 3). The definition of pelvic organ prolapse that was determined by the receiver operator characteristic curve was the leading edge of their vaginal wall that was -0.5 cm above the hymenal remnants. Multivariate analysis revealed age, Hispanic race, increasing body mass index, and the increasing weight of the vaginally delivered fetus as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse, as defined in this population. CONCLUSION The results from this population suggest that there is a bell-shaped distribution of pelvic organ support in a gynecologic clinic population. Advancing age, Hispanic race, increasing body mass index, and the increasing weight of the vaginally delivered fetus have the strongest correlations with prolapse.

[1]  L. Brubaker,et al.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  K. Rosenberger,et al.  Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse , 2005, International Urogynecology Journal.

[3]  K. Svärdsudd,et al.  Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  F. Gyntelberg,et al.  Heavy lifting at work and risk of genital prolapse and herniated lumbar disc in assistant nurses. , 1994, Occupational medicine.

[5]  Robert L. Harris,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  A. Weber,et al.  Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  G. Cundiff,et al.  Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  J. Colling,et al.  Epidemiology of Surgically Managed Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  S. Shott,et al.  Is Pelvic Organ Prolapse a Cause of Pelvic or Low Back Pain? , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  S. Swift,et al.  Case–Control Study of Etiologic Factors in the Development of Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse , 2001, International Urogynecology Journal.

[11]  E. Vittinghoff,et al.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  J. Nicholas,et al.  Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  J. Jelovsek,et al.  Pelvic organ prolapse , 2023, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[14]  M. Vitolins,et al.  Use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  M. Vessey,et al.  Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association study , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  S. Swift,et al.  The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  H. Gürel,et al.  Pelvic relaxation and associated risk factors, The results of logistic regression analysis , 1999, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[18]  A. McTiernan,et al.  Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  R. Dmochowski,et al.  The Standardization of Terminology for Researchers in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders , 2001, International Urogynecology Journal.

[20]  A. Maclennan,et al.  The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[21]  S. Swift,et al.  Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in the Dorsal Lithotomy Compared With the Standing Position , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  H. Peterson,et al.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988‐1990 , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  R. Bump,et al.  Racial comparisons and contrasts in urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.