Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: Acceptance, Benefits, and Concerns

While much of human-robot interaction research focuses upon people interacting with autonomous robots, there is also much to be gained from exploring human interpersonal interaction through robots. The current study focuses on mobile remote presence (MRP) systems as used by a population who could potentially benefit from more social connectivity and communication with remote people - older adults. Communication technologies are important for ensuring safety, independence, and social support for older adults, thereby potentially improving their quality of life and maintaining their independence [24]. However, before such technologies would be accepted and used by older adults, it is critical to understand their perceptions of the benefits, concerns, and adoption criteria for MRP systems. As such, we conducted a needs assessment with twelve volunteer participants (ages 63-88), who were given first-hand experience with both meeting a visitor via the MRP system and driving the MRP system to visit that person. The older adult participants identified benefits such as being able to see and be seen via the MRP system, reducing travel costs and hassles, and reducing social isolation. Among the concerns identified were etiquette of using the MRP, personal privacy, and overuse of the system. Some new use-cases were identified that have not yet been explored in prior work, for example, going to museums, attending live performances, and visiting friends who are hospitalized. The older adults in the current study preferred to operate the MRP themselves, rather than to be visited by others operating the MRP system. More findings are discussed in terms of their implications for design.

[1]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  The Influence of a Robot's Social Abilities on Acceptance by Elderly Users , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[2]  Yeh-Liang Hsu,et al.  Developing a telepresence robot for interpersonal communication with the elderly in a home environment. , 2007, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[3]  M. Skubic,et al.  Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[4]  John C. Tang,et al.  Embodied social proxy: mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Norman P. Jouppi,et al.  First steps towards mutually-immersive mobile telepresence , 2002, CSCW '02.

[6]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Pearl: A Mobile Robotic Assistant for the Elderly , 2002 .

[7]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Psychological Implications of Domestic Assistive Technology for the Elderly , 2007, PsychNology J..

[8]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  An Interactive Robot in a Nursing Home: Preliminary Remarks , 2005 .

[9]  H. Corriveau,et al.  A qualitative study of in-home robotic telepresence for home care of community-living elderly subjects , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  Jay Lundell,et al.  Catalyzing social interaction with ubiquitous computing: a needs assessment of elders coping with cognitive decline , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[11]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elders Living Independently in Their Homes , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  L. Gitlin,et al.  Conducting research on home environments: lessons learned and new directions. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[13]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[14]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Elderly people at home: technological help in everyday activities , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[15]  M. Lauria,et al.  REMOTE ASSISTANCE IN CAREGIVING USING TELEROBOT , 2007 .

[16]  Thomas Bak,et al.  Practical evaluation of robots for elderly in Denmark — an overview , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis methodology for assessing product adoption by older user populations. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  More than a Servant: Self-Reported Willingness of Younger and Older Adults to having a Robot perform Interactive and Critical Tasks in the Home , 2009, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual Meeting.

[19]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[20]  B. Kröse,et al.  Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users , 2009, INTERACT 2009.

[21]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[22]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[23]  John F. Canny,et al.  Social Tele-Embodiment: Understanding Presence , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[24]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.