Multi-Scale Simulations Provide Supporting Evidence for the Hypothesis of Intramolecular Protein Translocation in GroEL/GroES Complexes

The biological function of chaperone complexes is to assist the folding of non-native proteins. The widely studied GroEL chaperonin is a double-barreled complex that can trap non-native proteins in one of its two barrels. The ATP-driven binding of a GroES cap then results in a major structural change of the chamber where the substrate is trapped and initiates a refolding attempt. The two barrels operate anti-synchronously. The central region between the two barrels contains a high concentration of disordered protein chains, the role of which was thus far unclear. In this work we report a combination of atomistic and coarse-grained simulations that probe the structure and dynamics of the equatorial region of the GroEL/GroES chaperonin complex. Surprisingly, our simulations show that the equatorial region provides a translocation channel that will block the passage of folded proteins but allows the passage of secondary units with the diameter of an alpha-helix. We compute the free-energy barrier that has to be overcome during translocation and find that it can easily be crossed under the influence of thermal fluctuations. Hence, strongly non-native proteins can be squeezed like toothpaste from one barrel to the next where they will refold. Proteins that are already fairly close to the native state will not translocate but can refold in the chamber where they were trapped. Several experimental results are compatible with this scenario, and in the case of the experiments of Martin and Hartl, intra chaperonin translocation could explain why under physiological crowding conditions the chaperonin does not release the substrate protein.

[1]  Jan Ellenberg,et al.  Nucleocytoplasmic transport: Diffusion channel or phase transition? , 2001, Current Biology.

[2]  A. Horwich,et al.  Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[3]  H. Saibil,et al.  Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL–GroES complexes , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[4]  D. van der Spoel,et al.  GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation , 1995 .

[5]  Charu Chaudhry,et al.  Role of the γ‐phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL–GroES: function, structure and energetics , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[6]  D I Svergun,et al.  Protein hydration in solution: experimental observation by x-ray and neutron scattering. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Pair potentials for protein folding: Choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  T. Straatsma,et al.  THE MISSING TERM IN EFFECTIVE PAIR POTENTIALS , 1987 .

[10]  Leo Lue,et al.  Helical structures from an isotropic homopolymer model. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[11]  Flavio Seno,et al.  Geometry and symmetry presculpt the free-energy landscape of proteins. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Jason C. Young,et al.  Pathways of chaperone-mediated protein folding in the cytosol , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[13]  Neil A Ranson,et al.  The chaperonin folding machine. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[14]  Dmitri K. Klimov,et al.  Caging helps proteins fold , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Daan Frenkel,et al.  Translocation boost protein-folding efficiency of double-barreled chaperonins. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[16]  P. Adams,et al.  Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[17]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. , 1996, Structure.

[18]  S. Chen,et al.  ATP induces large quaternary rearrangements in a cage-like chaperonin structure , 1993, Current Biology.

[19]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[20]  A. Sali,et al.  Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[21]  Arthur L Horwich,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: fate of substrate polypeptide , 2003, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[22]  Edward Eisenstein,et al.  Interaction of GroEL and GroEL/GroES complexes with a nonnative subtilisin variant: a small-angle neutron scattering study. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[23]  F. Hartl,et al.  The effect of macromolecular crowding on chaperonin-mediated protein folding. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Fernando A Escobedo,et al.  Protein translocation through a tunnel induces changes in folding kinetics: A lattice model study , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  T Darden,et al.  New tricks for modelers from the crystallography toolkit: the particle mesh Ewald algorithm and its use in nucleic acid simulations. , 1999, Structure.

[26]  G. Favrin,et al.  Monte Carlo update for chain molecules: Biased Gaussian steps in torsional space , 2001, cond-mat/0103580.

[27]  Antonio Trovato,et al.  Optimal shapes of compact strings , 2000, Nature.