New methods give better estimates of changes in diagnostic accuracy when prior information is provided.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Les Irwig | Petra Macaskill | Stephen D Walter | Nehmat Houssami | L. Irwig | S. Walter | P. Macaskill | N. Houssami
[1] Diederick E Grobbee,et al. When should we remain blind and when should our eyes remain open in diagnostic studies? , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[2] Les Irwig,et al. The influence of clinical information on the accuracy of diagnostic mammography , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[3] Les Irwig,et al. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[4] Les Irwig,et al. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. , 2004, JAMA.
[5] E. DeLong,et al. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.
[6] S G Pauker,et al. Pathology and probabilities: a new approach to interpreting and reporting biopsies. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.
[7] L. Irwig,et al. Likelihood ratios for clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and fine needle biopsy in women with breast problems , 1998 .
[8] A R Feinstein,et al. The impact of clinical history on mammographic interpretations. , 1997, JAMA.
[9] D. Kleinbaum,et al. Mathematical modeling strategies for the analysis of epidemiologic research. , 1985, Annual Review of Public Health.
[10] L. Irwig,et al. The Influence of Knowledge of Mammography Findings on the Accuracy of Breast Ultrasound in Symptomatic Women , 2005, The breast journal.
[11] R. Dawes. Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .