Teaching Partnerships: Early Childhood and Engineering Students Teaching Math and Science Through Robotics

This paper presents an innovative approach to introducing pre-service early childhood teachers to math, science and technology education. The approach involves the creation of partnerships between pre-service early childhood and engineering students to conceive, develop, implement and evaluate curriculum in the area of math, science and technology by using robotics and the engineering design process. In this paper we first present the theoretical framework for the creation of these partnerships. We then introduce an experience done at Tufts University in which three different forms of partnership models evolved: the collaborator’s model, the external consultant’s model and the developer’s model. We also present different case studies from this experience and finally we conclude with some remarks and observations for making this work scalable and sustainable in other settings and universities.

[1]  Donna Llewellyn,et al.  The Georgia Tech Student And Teacher Enhancement Partnership (Step) Program: A Set Of Models Of Graduate Students Working In High Schools , 2002 .

[2]  Seymour Papert,et al.  What's the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[3]  Merredith D. Portsmore.  ROBOLAB Intuitive robotic programming software to support lifelong learning , 1999 .

[4]  Erik Rushton,et al.  Applying K 8 Engineering Education To Graduate Student Studies , 2003 .

[5]  Kristine L. Slentz,et al.  The Early Childhood Curriculum , 2001 .

[6]  Jed Lyons,et al.  Gk 12 Enhances Teaching Skills Of Engineering Graduate Students , 2003 .

[7]  Gary Benenson,et al.  The unrealized potential of everyday technology as a context for learning , 2001 .

[8]  Chris Rogers,et al.  STOMP: Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program , 2003 .

[9]  S. Bredekamp.  Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 , 1987 .

[10]  Secondary Education. Office for Career.  Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework , 2006 .

[11]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Technologies for lifelong kindergarten , 1998 .

[12]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Pianos not stereos: creating computational construction kits , 1996, INTR.

[13]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  To mindstorms and beyond: evolution of a construction kit for magical machines , 2000 .

[14]  Carol Seefeldt.  The early childhood curriculum : current findings in theory and practice , 1999 .

[15]  Greg Pearson,et al.  Technically speaking : why all Americans need to know more about technology , 2002 .

[16]  Juanita V. Copley,et al.  Preparing Teachers of Young Learners: Professional Development of Early Childhood Teachers in Mathematics and Science. , 1998 .

[17]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Research on Logo: Effects and Efficacy. , 1993 .

[18]  Sue Bredekamp,et al.  Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs , 1997 .

[19]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[20]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Teachers as Designers: Integrating Robotics in Early Childhood Education. , 2002 .

[21]  D. Clements.  Young Children and Technology , 1998 .

[22]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges , 2000 .

[23]  Michael Eisenberg,et al.  Beyond Black Boxes: Bringing Transparency and Aesthetics Back to Scientific Investigation , 2000 .

[24]  Giorgio De Michelis,et al.  Designing for Communities , 2000, D-CSCW.

[25]  Melpomeni Tsitouridou,et al.  Early Childhood Teachers’ Attitudes towards Computer and Information Technology: The Case of Greece , 2003 .

[26]  Soner Yıldırım.  Effects of an Educational Computing Course on Preservice and Inservice Teachers , 2000 .

[27]  C. Chaillé,et al.  The Young Child as Scientist: A Constructivist Approach to Early Childhood Science Education , 2002 .