Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: Mechanical properties and tissue reactions during a 3-year follow-up.

The study was aimed to test the mechanical strength, structural stability, and tissue reactions of optically amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone (PEEK) plates during a 3-year follow-up in vivo and in vitro. The injection-moulded PEEK plates were implanted to the dorsal subcutis of 12 sheep, which were sacrificed at 6-156 weeks. Thereafter, the plates were subjected to tensile tests, and levels of crystallinity were assessed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Histological evaluation was carried out using the paraffin technique. In vitro properties were examined with the tensile test and DSC at 0-156 weeks. Tissue reactions were mild and fairly similar for the amorphous and crystalline plates at corresponding points in time. The mechanical characteristics of the plates remained stable over the entire follow-up. The tensile yield load and elongation at the yield load of the crystalline plates were roughly double ( approximately 500 vs. 270 N and 2.4 vs. 1.4 mm, respectively) in comparison to the amorphous plates. The elongation at break load of the crystalline plates was smaller than that of the amorphous ones (6 vs. 10). The level of crystallinity in both the optically amorphous ( approximately 15%) and crystalline (32-34%) plates remained invariable during the follow-up. The in vitro and in vivo data coincided remarkably well. In conclusion, both optically amorphous and crystalline PEEK plates are suitable for the fixation of fractures and osteotomies.

[1]  H Hamada,et al.  Performance study of braided carbon/PEEK composite compression bone plates. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[2]  A. U. Daniels,et al.  Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers and composites proposed for internal fixation of bone. , 1990, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[3]  J. Galante,et al.  Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  K. Liao,et al.  Tensile properties, tension-tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[5]  W. Linhart,et al.  Response of primary fibroblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces , 2005, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[6]  M. Garle,et al.  Use of a novel carbon fibre composite material for the femoral stem component of a THR system: in vitro biological assessment. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[7]  J. Westendorf,et al.  Polyetheretherketone--cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[8]  A. Turner,et al.  Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[9]  C K Chua,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of three-dimensional poly(ether-ether-ketone)/-hydroxyapatite biocomposite scaffolds using laser sintering , 2005, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  L. Eschbach,et al.  Nonresorbable polymers in bone surgery. , 2000, Injury.

[11]  H. Dunn,et al.  Mechanical properties of some fibre reinforced polymer composites after implantation as fracture fixation plates. , 1980, Biomaterials.

[12]  R. Friedman,et al.  Pre-clinical in vivo evaluation of orthopaedic bioabsorbable devices. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[13]  G. Danuser,et al.  Chemically patterned, metal-oxide-based surfaces produced by photolithographic techniques for studying protein- and cell-interactions. II: Protein adsorption and early cell interactions. , 2003, Biomaterials.