Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions

Abstract Flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus L.) is an invasive aquatic and wetland plant capable of developing monotypic stands in emergent and submersed sites. This plant can rapidly outcompete native vegetation and impede human practices by reducing recreation (boating, fishing, and skiing) and disrupting agricultural use of water resources (irrigation canals). Mechanical removal practices occurring biweekly, monthly, bimonthly, and once per growing season were compared with chemical control with diquat applied sequentially at 0.19 ppmv ai for two consecutive months over 2 yr (2016 and 2017). Biweekly removal gave the most consistent control of B. umbellatus biomass and propagules. Diquat application along with monthly and bimonthly clippings gave varying degrees of B. umbellatus control. Clipping once per growing season did not control B. umbellatus when compared with reference plants, while clipping B. umbellatus every 2 wk (biweekly) controlled rush propagules most effectively. However, it is unlikely this method will be sufficient as a stand-alone control option due to the slow speed of harvester boats, the potential these boats have to spread B. umbellatus propagules to more sites, and the expense of mechanical operations. However, clipping could be used as part of an integrated strategy for B. umbellatus control.

[1]  C. Carter,et al.  Effects of initial propagule size and water depth on Butomus umbellatus L. growth and vegetative propagation , 2018, Aquatic Botany.

[2]  J. Madsen,et al.  Distribution and Biomass Allocation in Relation to Depth of Flowering Rush (Butomus umbellatus) in the Detroit Lakes, Minnesota , 2016, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[3]  J. Derr Common Reed (Phragmites Australis) Response to Mowing and Herbicide Application , 2008, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[4]  C. Eckert,et al.  INTERACTION BETWEEN FOURNDER EFFECT AND SELECTION DURING BIOLOGICAL INVASION IN AN AQUATIC PLANT , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  C. Eckert,et al.  Variation in sexual and clonal reproduction among introduced populations of flowering rush, Butomus umbellatus (Butomaceae) , 2000 .

[6]  Donald H. Les,et al.  Introduction of Nonindigenous Aquatic Vascular Plants in Southern New England: A Historical Perspective , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[7]  V. Jarolímová,et al.  The biology of Butomus umbellatus in shallow waters with fluctuating water level , 1996 .

[8]  I. Wile Environmental effects of mechanical harvesting , 1978 .

[9]  L. C. Anderson,et al.  Phytogeography and Possible Origins of Butomus in North America , 1974 .

[10]  C. James,et al.  Evaluations of contact aquatic herbicides for controlling two populations of submersed flowering rush , 2018 .

[11]  T. Woolf,et al.  Flowering rush control on drawn-down sediment : Mesocosm and field evaluations , 2016 .

[12]  J. Madsen,et al.  Management of flowering rush in the Detroit Lakes, Minnesota , 2016 .

[13]  J. M. Farrell,et al.  Habitats colonized by non-native flowering rush Butomus umbellatus (Linnaeus, 1753) in the Niagara River, USA , 2016 .

[14]  J. Madsen,et al.  Efficacy of combinations of diquat or triclopyr with fluridone for control of flowering rush , 2016 .

[15]  J. Madsen,et al.  Ecology and phenology of flowering rush in the Detroit Lakes chain of lakes , Minnesota , 2014 .

[16]  J. Madsen,et al.  Comparison of late-season herbicide treatments for control of emergent flowering rush in mesocosms , 2014 .

[17]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[18]  A. Poovey,et al.  Control of submersed flowering rush with contact and systemic aquatic herbicides under experimental conditions , 2013 .

[19]  D. Mihai,et al.  BUTOMUS UMBELLATUS MORPHO-STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS ON ADAPTIVE PLASTICITY , 2009 .

[20]  R. Charudattan,et al.  Are we on top of aquatic weeds? Weed problems, control options, and challenges , 2001 .

[21]  Travis L. Booms Vertebrates Removed by Mechanical Weed Harvesting in Lake Keesus, Wisconsin , 1999 .

[22]  G. Mikol Effects of harvesting on aquatic vegetation and juvenile fish populations at Saratoga Lake, New York. , 1985 .

[23]  C. B. Bryant Aquatic weed harvesting- effects and costs. , 1970 .

[24]  “Flora Europaea” , 1959, Nature.

[25]  W. C. Muenscher Butomus umbellatus in the Lake Champlain Basin , 1930 .