Risk ranking of chemical hazards in food - A case study on antibiotics in the Netherlands

Abstract Part of risk based control is the prioritization of hazard-food combinations for monitoring food safety. The aim of the current study was to develop a method for risk ranking of chemical food safety hazards using a structured and transparent approach. The method established is semi-quantitative and uses scores on both severity and probability of the hazard. The method was applied in a case study on antibiotic residue monitoring in a variety of products in the Netherlands. Severity of the hazard was scored using the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) as well as a score on the severity of antimicrobial resistance. Probability of the hazard depended on the amount of product consumed and on the amount of antibiotics used in animals as well as evidence of residues found. Data were gathered using literature research and expert opinions. The method showed that antibiotics most relevant for monitoring were product specific. Overall, nitrofurans were amongst the most important antibiotics to be included in monitoring programs for the products studied: pork, beef, poultry, honey and shrimps. This was mainly due to the detection of residues in products imported from outside the EU. Oxytetracycline was another major important antibiotic for the products studied (both nationally produced and imported). The study showed that the method derived is capable of ranking antibiotic-food combinations and has potential for the application in other chemical hazard-food combinations.

[1]  Moez Sanaa,et al.  Efficiency of risk-based vs . random sampling for the monitoring of tetracycline residues in slaughtered calves in Switzerland , 2008, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[2]  D. Mevius,et al.  MARAN 2009 : Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic usage in animals in the Netherlands in 2009 , 2011 .

[3]  N. Kautsky,et al.  Antibiotic use in shrimp farming and implications for environmental impacts and human health , 2003 .

[4]  H. D. De brabander,et al.  Antimicrobials in beekeeping. , 2012, Veterinary microbiology.

[5]  Linda J. Keeling,et al.  Scientific Opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (swine) , 2011 .

[6]  N. Bondt,et al.  Comparing antimicrobial exposure based on sales data. , 2013, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[7]  I. Gould,et al.  Antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for emergence of resistance: the influence of concentration , 2002, Journal of applied microbiology.

[8]  K D C Stärk,et al.  Policy-driven development of cost-effective, risk-based surveillance strategies. , 2012, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[9]  C. Saegerman,et al.  Food safety surveillance through a risk based control programme: Approach employed by the Belgian Federal Agency for the safety of the food chain , 2006, The Veterinary quarterly.

[10]  Gertraud Regula,et al.  Concepts for risk-based surveillance in the field of veterinary medicine and veterinary public health: Review of current approaches , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[11]  Lee-Ann Jaykus,et al.  Pathogen-produce pair attribution risk ranking tool to prioritize fresh produce commodity and pathogen combinations for further evaluation (P3ARRT) , 2011 .

[12]  L. Alban,et al.  Evaluation of the antibacterial residue surveillance programme in Danish pigs using Bayesian methods. , 2012, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[13]  H. J. van der Fels-Klerx,et al.  Overview of available methods for Risk Based Control within the European Union , 2012 .

[14]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  Chemicals and biological products used in south-east Asian shrimp farming, and their potential impact on the environment--a review. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.