Time-resolved imaging of three-dimensional nanoscale magnetization dynamics

Understanding and control of the dynamic response of magnetic materials with a three-dimensional magnetization distribution is important both fundamentally and for technological applications. From a fundamental point of view, the internal magnetic structure and dynamics in bulk materials still need to be mapped 1 , including the dynamic properties of topological structures such as vortices 2 , magnetic singularities 3 or skyrmion lattices 4 . From a technological point of view, the response of inductive materials to magnetic fields and spin-polarized currents is essential for magnetic sensors and data storage devices 5 . Here, we demonstrate time-resolved magnetic laminography, a pump–probe technique, which offers access to the temporal evolution of a three-dimensional magnetic microdisc with nanoscale resolution, and with a synchrotron-limited temporal resolution of 70 ps. We image the dynamic response to a 500 MHz magnetic field of the complex three-dimensional magnetization in a two-phase bulk magnet with a lateral spatial resolution of 50 nm. This is achieved with a stroboscopic measurement consisting of eight time steps evenly spaced over 2 ns. These measurements map the spatial transition between domain wall motion and the dynamics of a uniform magnetic domain that is attributed to variations in the magnetization state across the phase boundary. Our technique, which probes three-dimensional magnetic structures with temporal resolution, enables the experimental investigation of functionalities arising from dynamic phenomena in bulk and three-dimensional patterned nanomagnets 6 . Knowledge and control of the dynamic response in micromagnetic configurations is important both for understanding their fundamental properties and for their use in technological applications. Pump–probe magnetic laminography now unveils the evolution of the magnetization in a three-dimensional system with nanoscale resolution.

[1]  R. Hertel,et al.  Calculations of three-dimensional magnetic normal modes in mesoscopic permalloy prisms with vortex structure , 2007 .

[2]  C. David,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of magnetic domains. , 2010, Nature communications.

[3]  F. Sirotti,et al.  Direct observation of massless domain wall dynamics in nanostripes with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[4]  A. Locatelli,et al.  Bloch-point-mediated topological transformations of magnetic domain walls in cylindrical nanowires , 2018, Physical Review B.

[5]  Ming Yan,et al.  Curvature-Induced Asymmetric Spin-Wave Dispersion. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[6]  Lars Bocklage,et al.  Time-resolved imaging of nonlinear magnetic domain-wall dynamics in ferromagnetic nanowires , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[7]  M. Duch,et al.  Nanoscale imaging of buried topological defects with quantitative X-ray magnetic microscopy , 2015, Nature Communications.

[8]  D. Attwood Soft X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation , 1999 .

[9]  Young-Sang Yu,et al.  Dynamics of the Bloch point in an asymmetric permalloy disk , 2019, Nature Communications.

[10]  A. Hubert,et al.  Magnetic Domains: The Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures , 2014 .

[11]  T. Ono,et al.  Three-dimensional visualization of magnetic domain structure with strong uniaxial anisotropy via scanning hard X-ray microtomography , 2018 .

[12]  O. Bunk,et al.  High-Resolution Scanning X-ray Diffraction Microscopy , 2008, Science.

[13]  E. Snoeck,et al.  Size-Specific Spin Configurations in Single Iron Nanomagnet: From Flower to Exotic Vortices. , 2015, Nano letters.

[14]  J. Ansermet Magnetism and Synchrotron Radiation , 2001 .

[15]  M. Weigand,et al.  Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin-wave emitters. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.

[16]  M. Guizar‐Sicairos,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetization structures revealed with X-ray vector nanotomography , 2017, Nature.

[17]  O. Bunk,et al.  High-throughput ptychography using Eiger: scanning X-ray nano-imaging of extended regions. , 2014, Optics express.

[18]  J. Katine,et al.  Mutual phase-locking of microwave spin torque nano-oscillators , 2005, Nature.

[19]  C. David,et al.  Towards optimized illumination for high-resolution ptychography. , 2019, Optics express.

[20]  D. Shindo,et al.  Three-dimensional observation of magnetic vortex cores in stacked ferromagnetic discs. , 2015, Nano letters.

[21]  Yan Zhou,et al.  Deterministic creation and deletion of a single magnetic skyrmion observed by direct time-resolved X-ray microscopy , 2017, 1706.06726.

[22]  A. Menzel,et al.  High-resolution hard x-ray magnetic imaging with dichroic ptychography , 2016, 1603.03588.

[23]  B. N. Engel,et al.  Phase-locking in double-point-contact spin-transfer devices , 2005, Nature.

[24]  F. García-Sánchez,et al.  Fast domain wall dynamics in magnetic nanotubes: Suppression of Walker breakdown and Cherenkov-like spin wave emission , 2011 .

[25]  P. Thibault,et al.  Maximum-likelihood refinement for coherent diffractive imaging , 2012 .

[26]  Michael D. Schneider,et al.  Dynamics and inertia of skyrmionic spin structures , 2015, Nature Physics.

[27]  Jörg Raabe,et al.  Spatially and time-resolved magnetization dynamics driven by spin-orbit torques. , 2017, Nature nanotechnology.

[28]  E. Kneller,et al.  The exchange-spring magnet: a new material principle for permanent magnets , 1991 .

[29]  C. Marrows,et al.  Dynamic Imaging of the Delay- and Tilt-Free Motion of Néel Domain Walls in Perpendicularly Magnetized Superlattices. , 2018, Nano letters.

[30]  C. Buehler,et al.  Quantitative analysis of magnetic excitations in Landau flux-closure structures using synchrotron-radiation microscopy. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[31]  R. Hertel Ultrafast domain wall dynamics in magnetic nanotubes and nanowires , 2016, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[32]  R. Hertel,et al.  Micromagnetic study of magnetic configurations in submicron permalloy disks , 2003 .

[33]  C. Pfleiderer,et al.  Unwinding of a Skyrmion Lattice by Magnetic Monopoles , 2013, Science.

[34]  M. Guizar‐Sicairos,et al.  Tomographic reconstruction of a three-dimensional magnetization vector field , 2018, New Journal of Physics.

[35]  P. Fischer,et al.  Three-dimensional nanomagnetism , 2017, Nature Communications.

[36]  V. Zhukova,et al.  Supersonic domain wall in magnetic microwires , 2007 .

[37]  P. Fischer,et al.  Retrieving spin textures on curved magnetic thin films with full-field soft X-ray microscopies , 2015, Nature Communications.

[38]  C. H. Back,et al.  Magnetic vortex core reversal by excitation with short bursts of an alternating field , 2006, Nature.

[39]  Jörg Raabe,et al.  Error motion compensating tracking interferometer for the position measurement of objects with rotational degree of freedom , 2015 .

[40]  S. Parkin,et al.  Magnetic Domain-Wall Racetrack Memory , 2008, Science.

[41]  M. van Heel,et al.  Fourier shell correlation threshold criteria. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[42]  Jörg Raabe,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of integrated circuits with macro- to nanoscale zoom , 2019, Nature Electronics.

[43]  John Banhart,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of magnetic fields with polarized neutrons , 2008 .

[44]  Mirko Holler,et al.  Alignment methods for nanotomography with deep subpixel accuracy. , 2019, Optics express.

[45]  O. Bunk,et al.  OMNY-A tOMography Nano crYo stage. , 2018, The Review of scientific instruments.

[46]  D Petit,et al.  Magnetic Domain-Wall Logic , 2005, Science.

[47]  Tensorial neutron tomography of three-dimensional magnetic vector fields in bulk materials , 2018, Nature Communications.

[48]  Manuel Guizar-Sicairos,et al.  Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms. , 2008, Optics letters.

[49]  A. Scholl,et al.  Vortex Core-Driven Magnetization Dynamics , 2004, Science.