Controlled experiment replication in evaluation of e-learning system's educational influence

We believe that every effectiveness evaluation should be replicated at least in order to verify the original results and to indicate evaluated e-learning system's advantages or disadvantages. This paper presents the methodology for conducting controlled experiment replication, as well as, results of a controlled experiment and an internal replication that investigated the effectiveness of intelligent authoring shell eXtended Tutor-Expert System (xTEx-Sys). The initial and the replicated experiment were based on our approach that combines classical two-group experimental design and with factoral design. A trait that distinguishes this approach from others is the existence of arbitrary number of checkpoint-tests to determine the effectiveness in intermediate states. We call it a pre-and-post test control group experimental design with checkpoint-tests. The gained results revealed small or even negative effect sizes, which could be explained by the fact that the xTEx-Sys's domain knowledge presentation is rather novel for students and therefore difficult to grasp and apply in earlier phases of the experiment. In order to develop and improve the xTEx-Sys, further experiments must be conducted.

[1]  Miguel-Ángel Sicilia,et al.  e-Learning in Project Management Using Simulation Models: A Case Study Based on the Replication of an Experiment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[2]  Johan Per Fredrik Almqvist,et al.  Replication of Controlled Experiments in Empirical Software Engineering - A Survey , 2006 .

[3]  B. Bloom The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[4]  ShepperdMartin,et al.  A Review of Experimental Investigations into Object-Oriented Technology , 2002 .

[5]  Tom Murray,et al.  Having It All, Maybe: Design Tradeoffs in ITS Authoring Tools , 1996, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[6]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Some principles of intelligent tutoring , 1986 .

[7]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  The Design of Replicated Studies , 1993 .

[8]  Ani Grubišić,et al.  An approach to automatic evaluation of educational influence , 2006 .

[9]  Dietmar Pfahl,et al.  Evaluating the learning effectiveness of using simulations in software project management education: results from a twice replicated experiment , 2004, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[10]  Ashok Patel,et al.  A Classification of Evaluation Methods for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[11]  Udo Arend,et al.  Software-Ergonomie '99, Design von Informationswelten, Gemeinsame Fachtagung des German Chapter of the ACM, der Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) und der SAP AG, 8.-11. März 1999, Walldorf, Baden, Deutschland , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[12]  Ani Grubišić,et al.  E-Learning Paradigm & Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2004 .

[13]  Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al.  Experimental design and analysis in software engineering: Part 2: how to set up and experiment , 1995, SOEN.

[14]  Ani Grubišić,et al.  What is Our Effect Size: Evaluating the Educational Influence of a Web-Based Intelligent Authoring Shell? , 2004 .

[15]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research methods knowledge base , 2001 .

[16]  J. Lucas,et al.  Theory-Testing, Generalization, and the Problem of External Validity* , 2003 .

[17]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems , 1987 .

[18]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Approaches to evaluating the effect of ICT on student learning , 2002 .

[19]  Marin Litoiu,et al.  Designing Process Replication and Activation: A Quantitative Approach , 2000, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[20]  Rose E. Gaines Das,et al.  Role of ancillary variables in the design, analysis, and interpretation of animal experiments. , 2002 .

[21]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[22]  Jim E. Greer,et al.  Evaluation Methodologies for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. , 1993 .

[23]  R. G. Gaines Das Role of ancillary variables in the design, analysis, and interpretation of animal experiments. , 2002, ILAR journal.