Devising and Demonstrating an Extreme Weather Risk Indicator for Use in Transportation Systems

This paper describes a novel risk indicator for extreme weather risks for use in transportation systems. The risk indicator is applied to the European transportation system indicating and ranking the risks for the 27 member states of the European Union (EU-27). The paper starts with definitions of hazards, vulnerability, and risk, based on relevant literature, and then operationalizes the risk, hazard, and vulnerability with the help of EU-27 data. Finally, the paper discusses the extreme weather risk indicator (EWRI) and evaluates its applicability and limitations. The risk indicator is a relative indicator: it should be viewed and treated as a ranking system. The devised indicator is able to assist decision makers at national and state as well as international and federal levels in the prioritization of extreme weather risks within their jurisdiction. The overall approach of EWRI is based on mainstream risk and vulnerability assessment research, following for the most part the existing conceptual models. The novelty of EWRI lies in its application area (transportation) and wide use of both empirical and statistical data. EWRI was used to assess the hazards, vulnerabilities, and risks of extreme weather for the EU-27, but nothing hinders its application, either in this form or a modified form, in other contexts.

[1]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the consistency of risk acceptance criteria with normative theories for decision-making , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  S. Xavier,et al.  The Global Competitiveness Report 2011 - 2012 , 2011 .

[3]  Matthew Leitch,et al.  ISO 31000:2009—The New International Standard on Risk Management , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  S. Hanson,et al.  Ranking Port Cities with High Exposure and Vulnerability to Climate Extremes: Exposure Estimates , 2008 .

[5]  Geoffrey J. D. Hewings,et al.  Retrofit Priority of Transport Network Links under an Earthquake , 2003 .

[6]  Robert S. Chen,et al.  Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis , 2005 .

[7]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  Living with Risk: The Geography of Technological Hazards , 1993 .

[8]  Rik Eshuis,et al.  Outlook , 2010, Dynamic Business Process Formation for Instant Virtual Enterprises.

[9]  Claudio Margottini,et al.  Introduction to Sustainable Risk Mitigation for a More Resilient Europe , 2011 .

[10]  Pirkko Saarikivi,et al.  Probabilities of adverse weather affecting transport in Europe: climatology and scenarios up to the 2050s , 2011 .

[11]  A. Renda,et al.  Protecting Critical Infrastructure in the EU , 2010 .

[12]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  FUNCTION BASED RISK ASSESSMENT: MAPPING FUNCTION TO LIKELIHOOD , 2005 .

[13]  Michael A. P. Taylor,et al.  Transport Network Vulnerability: a Method for Diagnosis of Critical Locations in Transport Infrastructure Systems , 2007 .

[14]  Grant Purdy,et al.  ISO 31000:2009—Setting a New Standard for Risk Management , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Hans-Martin Füssel,et al.  Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research , 2007 .

[16]  L. Klee.  Risk and Insurance , 2014 .

[17]  Thorsten Mühlhausen,et al.  Weather hazards and vulnerabilities for the European transport system - a risk panorama. EWENT project D5.1 , 2012 .

[18]  George L. Head.  An Alternative to Defining Risk as Uncertainty , 1967 .

[19]  D. Sheridan,et al.  Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards , 2010 .

[20]  Frank Rehm,et al.  Extreme weather impacts on transport systems , 2011 .