Brain mechanisms for representing what another person sees

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a naturalistic joint attention scenario to evaluate two, alternative hypotheses concerning the social brain. The first, Content Specific Attribution hypothesis, was that core regions previously identified as being involved in social cognition also participate in representing the contents of another mind. The second, Dual Role hypothesis, was that extrastriate, category-specific visual regions respond to a visible stimulus of a specific category and to the same stimulus occluded, but when it appears to be the focus of another person's visual attention. Participants viewed category-specific stimuli (Place and Body images) to localize the extrastriate body area (EBA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA). Then, they observed a computerized character viewing each stimulus category, occluded from the participant's view. In support of the Content Specific Attribution hypothesis, whole-brain analyses revealed that viewing someone else looking at an occluded picture of a body activated brain regions previously associated with components of social cognition more than viewing someone else looking at an occluded picture of a place. Counter to the Dual Role hypothesis, functional region of interest (ROI) analyses revealed that the EBA and PPA were not clearly involved in representing what the character was seeing.

[1]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  S Zeki,et al.  The sightless view: neural correlates of occluded objects. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Understanding Intentions in Social Interaction: The Role of the Anterior Paracingulate Cortex , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Cortical systems mediating visual attention to both objects and spatial locations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  D. Perrett,et al.  Neuronal representation of disappearing and hidden objects in temporal cortex of the macaque , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  D. Perrett,et al.  A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  D. Perrett,et al.  Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  S Zeki,et al.  The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[13]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[14]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object and spatial visual working memory activate separate neural systems in human cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  S. Yantis,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual analysis of body movements by neurones in the temporal cortex of the macaque monkey: A preliminary report , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  R. Saxe Uniquely human social cognition , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Mental Imagery of Faces and Places Activates Corresponding Stimulus-Specific Brain Regions , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  David I. Perrett,et al.  An fMRI study of joint attention experience , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  D. Perrett,et al.  Recognition of objects and their component parts: responses of single units in the temporal cortex of the macaque. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  C. Frith,et al.  Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET , 1993, Nature.

[30]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[31]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Face processing without awareness in the right fusiform gyrus , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  J. Decety,et al.  Brain Regions Involved in the Perception of Gaze: A PET Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[33]  Cheryl L. Grady,et al.  Hemispheric differences in neural systems for face working memory: A PET‐rCBF study , 1995 .