A Meta-Analytic Vision of the Effect of Ownership Structure on Firm Performance

There is a considerable volume of research on the effects of ownership structure on firm performance. However, the empirical results in this field are often conflicting and inconsistent. A meta-analysis based on 33 studies allows an integration of the results on the association between insider ownership, ownership concentration and firm performance. The findings show that governance system, measurement of performance, and control for endogeneity moderate the effect of ownership on firm performance.

[1]  Sanghoon Lee Ownership Structure and Financial Performance: Evidence from Panel Data of South Korea , 2008 .

[2]  Carl R. Chen,et al.  Corporate Value, Managerial Stockholdings and Investments of Japanese Firms , 2006 .

[3]  D. Hay,et al.  Audit Fees: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes , 2006 .

[4]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Blockholder ownership: Effects on firm value in market and control based governance systems , 2006 .

[5]  Benjamin Maury Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Western European Corporations , 2006 .

[6]  Yin‐Hua Yeh Do Controlling Shareholders Enhance Corporate Value? , 2005 .

[7]  Julio Pindado,et al.  Ownership structure and firm value: new evidence from Spain , 2004 .

[8]  Eliezer M. Fich,et al.  Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors? , 2004 .

[9]  Markus Schmid,et al.  An Integrated Framework of Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation - Evidence from Switzerland , 2004 .

[10]  Sanjay Goel,et al.  Ownership structure, founder leadership, and performance in Norwegian SMEs: implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities , 2003 .

[11]  A. D. de Miguel,et al.  Ownership Structure and Firm Value: New Evidence from the Spanish Corporate Governance System , 2003 .

[12]  James G. Combs,et al.  Why Do Firms Use Franchising as an Entrepreneurial Strategy?: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[13]  Sung Wook Joh,et al.  Corporate governance and firm profitability: evidence from Korea before the economic crisis , 2003 .

[14]  Lary Li,et al.  The Relationship between Valuation and Ownership of Listed Firms in China , 2003 .

[15]  O. Guedhami,et al.  Postprivatization Corporate Governance: The Role of Ownership Structure and Investor Protection , 2003 .

[16]  W. Callahan,et al.  An analysis of the effect of management participation in director selection on the long-term performance of the firm , 2003 .

[17]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion? , 2003 .

[18]  Diane K. Denis,et al.  International Corporate Governance , 2003, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[19]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[20]  David Hillier,et al.  Ownership Structure, Managerial Behavior and Corporate Value , 2005 .

[21]  Renée B. Adams,et al.  Identifying the Effect of Managerial Control on Firm Performance , 2004 .

[22]  Stijn Claessens,et al.  Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings , 2002 .

[23]  Y. T. Mak,et al.  The relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in high R&D firms , 2002 .

[24]  Leonidas C. Leonidou,et al.  Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: a meta-analysis , 2002 .

[25]  Larry H. P. Lang,et al.  The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations , 2002 .

[26]  Chamu Sundaramurthy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Board Leadership Structure and Financial Performance: are "two heads better than one"? , 2001 .

[27]  Darius Palia,et al.  The Endogeneity of Managerial Compensation in Firm Valuation: A Solution , 2001 .

[28]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance , 2001 .

[29]  Victoria B. McWilliams,et al.  An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance , 2001 .

[30]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest european companies , 2000 .

[31]  Masao Nakamura,et al.  Banks, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value in Japan , 2000 .

[32]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  How Much Does Performance Matter? A Meta-Analysis of CEO Pay Studies , 2000 .

[33]  Thomas Andersson,et al.  Corporate Governance: Effects on Firm Performance and Economic Growth , 2000 .

[34]  Jürgen Weigand,et al.  Does the Governed Corporation Perform Better? Governance Structures and Corporate Performance in Germany , 2000 .

[35]  E. Friedman,et al.  Corporate Governance in the Asian Financial Crisis , 2000 .

[36]  M. Lasfer,et al.  Managerial Ownership, Board Structure and Firm Value: The UK Evidence , 1999 .

[37]  Helen Short,et al.  Managerial ownership and the performance of firms: Evidence from the UK , 1999 .

[38]  Ian Ramsay,et al.  Director Share Ownership and Corporate Performance - Evidence from Australia , 1998 .

[39]  J. L. Stimpert,et al.  BOARD COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: TWO STUDIES OF INSIDER/OUTSIDER EFFECTS , 1998 .

[40]  Daniel Shapiro,et al.  Management and ownership effects: evidence from five countries , 1998 .

[41]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS OF BOARD COMPOSITION, LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE, AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[42]  Ki C. Han,et al.  The effect of ownership structure on firm performance: Additional evidence , 1998 .

[43]  Myeong-Hyeon Cho,et al.  Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis , 1998 .

[44]  Kenneth J. Martin,et al.  Executive stock ownership and performance tracking faint traces , 1997 .

[45]  S. R. Kole Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: Incentives or Rewards? , 1996 .

[46]  D. Yermack Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors , 1996 .

[47]  Anup Agrawal,et al.  Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders , 1995, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[48]  K. Keasey,et al.  Directors' ownership and the performance of small and medium sized firms in the U.K. , 1994 .

[49]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance , 1991 .

[50]  A. Shleifer,et al.  The takeover wave of the 1980s. , 1991, Science.

[51]  John Mcconnell,et al.  Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value , 1990 .

[52]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model , 1989 .

[53]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control , 1988 .

[54]  M. Harris,et al.  Corporate governance: Voting rights and majority rules , 1988 .

[55]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[56]  F. Wolf Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis , 1987 .

[57]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Large Shareholders and Corporate Control , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[58]  R. Gooding,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship between Size and Performance: The Productivity and Efficiency of Organizations and Their Subunits. , 1985 .

[59]  R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[60]  H. Demsetz The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[61]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[62]  Kurt Mandelbaum,et al.  The Modern Corporation and Private Property , 1933 .