Integrating Problem Structuring Methods And Concept-Knowledge Theory For An Advanced Policy Design: Lessons From A Case Study In Cyprus

Abstract Evidence suggests that policies frequently fail due, on the one side, to a simplification of the uncertainty and complexity associated with stakeholders’ problem-understanding and, on the other side, due to the lack of methodologies for innovative generation of policy alternatives. This work describes a methodology based on the integration of Problem Structuring Methods and Concept-Knowledge Theory as a mean to transform ambiguity in problem-framing from a barrier to an enabling factor in collaborative settings. This methodology supports the generative design process for innovative and consensual policies. The methodology was implemented for a case of designing water management policy in the Republic of Cyprus.

[1]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  What's the Problem? An Introduction to Problem Structuring Methods , 1996 .

[2]  Alessandro Pagano,et al.  Assessing stakeholders' risk perception to promote Nature Based Solutions as flood protection strategies: The case of the Glinščica river (Slovenia). , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Technologies of humility , 2007, Nature.

[4]  Michael Howlett,et al.  From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance , 2014 .

[5]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Design as Forcing: Deepening the Foundations of C-K Theory , 2007 .

[6]  Chris M. Smith,et al.  The characteristics of problem structuring methods: A literature review , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Jen Cleary,et al.  A Tool and Process that Facilitate Community Capacity Building and Social Learning for Natural Resource Management , 2013 .

[8]  Kasper Kok,et al.  The potential of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil , 2009 .

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[10]  Melanie Keller.  Cost Benefit Analysis Theory And Practice , 2016 .

[11]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  What Is a Decision Problem? Designing Alternatives , 2018 .

[12]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  How to Use Ambiguity in Problem Framing for Enabling Divergent Thinking: Integrating Problem Structuring Methods and Concept-Knowledge Theory , 2019, Behavioral Operational Research.

[13]  Peter deLeon,et al.  THE CONTEXTUAL BURDENS OF POLICY DESIGN1 , 1988 .

[14]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Facilitated modelling in operational research , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model-building: tackling messy problems , 1999 .

[16]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Problem structuring methods 'in the Dock': Arguing the case for Soft OR , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Thomas A. Birkland,et al.  An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making , 2001 .

[18]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  An explicative model of ‘public’ interorganizational interactions , 1993 .

[19]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  From Social Theory to Policy Design , 1984, Journal of Public Policy.

[20]  Peter J. May,et al.  Policy Design and Implementation , 2003 .

[21]  Marcela Brugnach,et al.  Shifting to ecological engineering in flood management: Introducing new uncertainties in the development of a Building with Nature pilot project , 2012 .

[22]  Colin Eden,et al.  Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[24]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  Design Theory for Generating Alternatives in Public Decision Making Processes , 2019, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[25]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Rethinking Soft OR interventions: Models as boundary objects , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  A. Pagano,et al.  Enhancing nature-based solutions acceptance through stakeholders' engagement in co-benefits identification and trade-offs analysis. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Dimitrios Zikos,et al.  Beyond water security: asecuritisation and identity in Cyprus , 2015, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[28]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[29]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Don't Toss Coins in Garbage Cans: A Prologue to Policy Design , 1983, Journal of Public Policy.

[30]  Gustavo Valdivieso,et al.  Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments , 2012 .

[31]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A NEW APPROACH OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN : AN INTRODUCTION TO C-K THEORY. , 2003 .

[32]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Design Theory: Methods and Organization for Innovation , 2017 .

[33]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Past, present and future of problem structuring methods , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[34]  Art Dewulf,et al.  Issue Framing in Conversations for Change , 2012 .

[35]  Jesús Zúñiga,et al.  Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments , 2018, Revista Estudiantil Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales.

[36]  P. Checkland.  Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective a , 2000 .

[37]  Anne L. Schneider,et al.  Policy analysis by design , 1987 .

[38]  Sreeja Nair,et al.  Meaning and power in the design and development of policy experiments , 2016 .

[39]  Lucy Kimbell,et al.  Design in the Time of Policy Problems , 2016 .

[40]  Ernest R. Alexander,et al.  Design in the decision-making process , 1982 .

[41]  David L. Weinter.  The Craft of Policy Design: Can It Be More Than Art? , 1992 .

[42]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design , 2009 .

[43]  Patricia W. Ingraham.  TOWARD MORE SYSTEMATIC CONSIDERATION OF POLICY DESIGN1 , 1987 .

[44]  Richard C. Larson,et al.  Urban Operations Research , 1981 .

[45]  John Mingers,et al.  A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  Mark Considine,et al.  Policy design as craft: teasing out policy design expertise using a semi-experimental approach , 2013, Policy Sciences.

[47]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[48]  Marcela Brugnach,et al.  Ambiguity: the challenge of knowing and deciding together , 2012 .

[49]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  A system dynamics model for supporting decision-makers in irrigation water management. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[50]  Irene Pluchinotta,et al.  Ambiguity in Problem Framing as a Barrier to Collective Actions: Some Hints from Groundwater Protection Policy in the Apulia Region , 2017 .

[51]  Alessandro Pagano,et al.  Engaging stakeholders in the assessment of NBS effectiveness in flood risk reduction: A participatory System Dynamics Model for benefits and co-benefits evaluation. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[52]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[53]  Domenico Camarda,et al.  Fuzzy cognitive mapping to support multi-agent decisions in development of urban policymaking , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[54]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[55]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  Studying the generation of alternatives in public policy making processes , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[56]  Marine Agogué,et al.  An introduction to innovative design - Elements and applications of C-K theory , 2014 .

[57]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[58]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[59]  Uygar Özesmi,et al.  Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2004 .

[60]  J. Mustajoki,et al.  How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach , 2015 .

[61]  Marine Agogué,et al.  10 Years of C–K Theory: A Survey on the Academic and Industrial Impacts of a Design Theory , 2014 .

[62]  Brian Ripley,et al.  THE AMBITIONS OF POLICY DESIGN , 1988 .

[63]  Davis B. Bobrow,et al.  Policy Design: Ubiquitous, Necessary and Difficult , 2006 .

[64]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[65]  Suzanne A. Pierce,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders e Next generation , 2015 .

[66]  Andrew C. Worthington,et al.  The Evaluation of Public Policy: Normative Economic Theories of Government Failure , 1996 .

[67]  Lorraine Warren,et al.  Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, 2nd edition. Edited by Jonathan Rosenhead and John Mingers. Published by Wiley, Chichester, 2001, 366 pp., ISBN 0 471 49523 9, £22.50 , 2002 .

[68]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning , 1993 .

[69]  C. Eden.  ON THE NATURE OF COGNITIVE MAPS , 1992 .

[70]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  From evidence-based policy making to policy analytics , 2016, Ann. Oper. Res..

[71]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[72]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .