Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design

Osmotically-driven membrane processes, such as forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis, operate on the principle of osmotic transport of water across a semipermeable membrane from a dilute feed solution into a concentrated draw solution. The major hindrance to permeate water flux performance is the prevalence of concentration polarization on both sides of the membrane. This article evaluates the external and internal boundary layers, which decrease the effective osmotic driving force. By modeling permeate flux performance, the role that feed and draw concentrations, membrane orientation, and membrane structural properties play in overall permeate flux performance are elucidated and linked to prevalence of external and internal concentration polarization. External concentration polarization is found to play a significant role in the reduction of driving force, though internal concentration polarization has a far more pronounced effect for the chosen system conditions. Reduction of internal concentration polarization by way of membrane modification was found to improve the predicted flux performance significantly, suggesting that alteration of membrane design will lead to improved performance of osmotically driven membrane processes. 2007 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 53: 1736–1744, 2007

[1]  H. Lazarides,et al.  Osmotic concentration of liquid foods , 2001 .

[2]  Richard E. Kravath,et al.  Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis , 1975 .

[3]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[4]  V. Lobo,et al.  Mutual diffusion coefficients in aqueous electrolyte solutions (Technical Report) , 1993 .

[5]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis , 1976 .

[6]  K. Petrotos,et al.  A study of the direct osmotic concentration of tomato juice in tubular membrane – module configuration. I. The effect of certain basic process parameters on the process performance , 1998 .

[7]  E. Drioli,et al.  Recent advances on membrane processes for the concentration of fruit juices: a review , 2004 .

[8]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[9]  Michael Flynn,et al.  Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space Part I. Direct osmotic concentration as pretreatment for reverse osmosis , 2005 .

[10]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[11]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[12]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Forward osmosis extractors , 1976 .

[13]  Klaus-Viktor Peinemann,et al.  Membranes for Power Generation by Pressure Retarded Osmosis , 2008 .

[14]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[15]  S. Loeb.  Energy production at the Dead Sea by pressure-retarded osmosis: challenge or chimera? , 1998 .

[16]  Sidney Loeb.  One hundred and thirty benign and renewable megawatts from Great Salt Lake? The possibilities of hydroelectric power by pressure-retarded osmosis with spiral module membranes: Desalination, 141 (2001) 85–91 , 2002 .

[17]  Sidney Loeb,et al.  One hundred and thirty benign and renewable megawatts from Great Salt lake? The possibilities of hydroelectric power by pressure-retarded osmosis , 2001 .

[18]  S. Loeb.  Large-scale power production by pressure-retarded osmosis, using river water and sea water passing through spiral modules , 2002 .

[19]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[20]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .