Development of Algorithm for Discriminating Hydrometeor Particle Types With a Synergistic Use of CloudSat and CALIPSO

We developed a method for classifying hydrometeor particle types, including cloud and precipitation phase and ice crystal habit, by a synergistic use of CloudSat/Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO)/Cloud-Aerosol LIdar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP). We investigated how the cloud phase and ice crystal habit characterized by CALIOP globally relate with radar reflectivity and temperature. The global relationship thus identified was employed to develop an algorithm for hydrometeor type classification with CPR alone. The CPR-based type classification was then combined with CALIPSO-based type characterization to give CPR-CALIOP synergy classification. A unique aspect of this algorithm is to exploit and combine the lidar's sensitivity to thin ice clouds and the radar's ability to penetrate light precipitation to offer more complete picture of vertically resolved hydrometeor type classification than has been provided by previous studies. Given the complementary nature of radar and lidar detections of hydrometeors, our algorithm delivers thirteen hydrometeor types: warm water, supercooled water, randomly-oriented ice crystal (3D-ice), horizontally-oriented plate (2D-plate), 3D-ice+2D-plate, liquid drizzle, mixed-phase drizzle, rain, snow, mixed-phase cloud, water+liquid drizzle, water+rain and unknown. The global statistics of three-dimensional occurrence frequency of each hydrometeor type revealed that 3D-ice contributes the most to the total cloud occurrence frequency (53.8%), followed by supercooled water (14.3%), 2D-plate (9.2%), rain (5.9%), warm water (5.7%), snow (4.8%), mixed-phase drizzle (2.3%), and the remaining types (4.0%). This hydrometeor type classification provides useful observation-based information for climate model diagnostics in representation of cloud phase and their microphysical characteristics.

[1]  G. Stephens,et al.  Near global observations of the warm rain coalescence process , 2007 .

[2]  Riko Oki,et al.  The EarthCARE Satellite: The Next Step Forward in Global Measurements of Clouds, Aerosols, Precipitation, and Radiation , 2015 .

[3]  M. Wendisch,et al.  Influence of ice crystal shape on retrieval of cirrus optical thickness and effective radius: A case study , 2009 .

[4]  Zhaoxin Li,et al.  Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties , 1991 .

[5]  Jeffrey A. Jones,et al.  Use of the Surface Reference Technique for Path Attenuation Estimates from the TRMM Precipitation Radar , 2000 .

[6]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  Ice cloud depolarization for nadir and off‐nadir CALIPSO measurements , 2012 .

[7]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Refinement of global ice microphysics using spaceborne active sensors , 2011 .

[8]  R. Marchand,et al.  Hydrometeor Detection Using Cloudsat—An Earth-Orbiting 94-GHz Cloud Radar , 2008 .

[9]  G. Mace,et al.  Tropical composition, cloud and climate coupling experiment validation for cirrus cloud profiling retrieval using cloudsat radar and CALIPSO lidar , 2010 .

[10]  J. Verlinde,et al.  CloudSat as a Global Radar Calibrator , 2011 .

[11]  N. Pounder,et al.  From CloudSat‐CALIPSO to EarthCare: Evolution of the DARDAR cloud classification and its comparison to airborne radar‐lidar observations , 2013 .

[12]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Development of a multiple-field-of-view multiple-scattering polarization lidar: comparison with cloud radar. , 2016, Optics express.

[13]  Guosheng Liu,et al.  Deriving snow cloud characteristics from CloudSat observations , 2008 .

[14]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  Scattering of Polarized Laser Light by Water Droplet, Mixed-Phase and Ice Crystal Clouds. Part I: Angular Scattering Patterns , 1979 .

[15]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .

[17]  Makiko Hirakata,et al.  Comparison of Global and Seasonal Characteristics of Cloud Phase and Horizontal Ice Plates Derived from CALIPSO with MODIS and ECMWF , 2014 .

[18]  Jeffrey A. Jones,et al.  A Hybrid Surface Reference Technique and Its Application to the TRMM Precipitation Radar , 2004 .

[19]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Global analysis of ice microphysics from CloudSat and CALIPSO: Incorporation of specular reflection in lidar signals , 2010 .

[20]  S. Emori,et al.  Vertical cloud structure observed from shipborne radar and lidar: Midlatitude case study during the MR01/K02 cruise of the research vessel Mirai , 2007 .

[21]  R. Hogan,et al.  Combined CloudSat-CALIPSO-MODIS retrievals of the properties of ice clouds , 2010 .

[22]  Pierre H. Flamant,et al.  Ice crystal shapes in cirrus clouds derived from POLDER/ADEOS‐1 , 2001 .

[23]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Study of Horizontally Oriented Ice Crystals with CALIPSO Observations and Comparison with Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer Simulations , 2012 .

[24]  Ping Yang,et al.  On the Retrieval of Ice Cloud Particle Shapes from POLDER Measurements , 2006 .

[25]  Sergey Y. Matrosov,et al.  Evaluation of Radar Reflectivity-Based Estimates of Water Content in Stratiform Marine Clouds , 2004 .

[26]  J. R. Eyre,et al.  Assimilation of TOVS radiance information through one-dimensional variational analysis , 1993 .

[27]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .

[28]  Graeme L. Stephens,et al.  Retrieval of ice cloud microphysical parameters using the CloudSat millimeter‐wave radar and temperature , 2009 .

[29]  J. Iaquinta,et al.  Cirrus Crystal Terminal Velocities , 2000 .

[30]  A. Stohl,et al.  In-situ airborne observations of the microphysical properties of the Arctic tropospheric aerosol during late spring and summer , 2008 .

[31]  T. Storelvmo,et al.  Observational constraints on mixed-phase clouds imply higher climate sensitivity , 2015, Science.

[32]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Cloud thermodynamic phase inferred from merged POLDER and MODIS data , 2007 .

[33]  Yoko Tsushima,et al.  Importance of the mixed-phase cloud distribution in the control climate for assessing the response of clouds to carbon dioxide increase: a multi-model study , 2006 .

[34]  Maurice Herman,et al.  Cloud thermodynamical phase classification from the POLDER spaceborne instrument , 2000 .

[35]  K. Sassen,et al.  A global survey of CALIPSO linear depolarization ratios in ice clouds: Initial findings , 2009 .

[36]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Global analysis of cloud phase and ice crystal orientation from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) data using attenuated backscattering and depolarization ratio , 2010 .

[37]  Steven D. Miller,et al.  Rainfall retrieval over the ocean with spaceborne W‐band radar , 2009 .

[38]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Using in situ airborne measurements to evaluate three cloud phase products derived from CALIPSO , 2016 .

[39]  Zhien Wang,et al.  Liquid–Ice Mass Partition in Tropical Maritime Convective Clouds , 2016 .

[40]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[41]  S. Woods,et al.  The Microphysics of Ice and Precipitation Development in Tropical Cumulus Clouds , 2015 .

[42]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Development of a combined CloudSat‐CALIPSO cloud mask to show global cloud distribution , 2010 .

[43]  Kenneth G. Libbrecht,et al.  The physics of snow crystals , 2005 .

[44]  Anthony D. Del Genio,et al.  A Prognostic Cloud Water Parameterization for Global Climate Models , 1996 .

[45]  D. Winker,et al.  CALIPSO Lidar Description and Performance Assessment , 2009 .

[46]  Matthew D. Shupe,et al.  A ground‐based multisensor cloud phase classifier , 2007 .

[47]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 1. Data and models , 2000 .

[48]  Berengere Dubrulle,et al.  Horizontally Oriented Plates in Clouds , 2004 .

[49]  K. Stamnes,et al.  CALIPSO/CALIOP Cloud Phase Discrimination Algorithm , 2009 .

[50]  Zhien Wang,et al.  Climatology of drizzle in marine boundary layer clouds based on 1 year of data from CloudSat and Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) , 2008 .

[51]  M. Shupe,et al.  Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds , 2012 .

[52]  Hilding Sundqvist,et al.  A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content , 1978 .

[53]  E. Bigg.  The formation of atmospheric ice crystals by the freezing of droplets , 1953 .

[54]  Y. Hagihara,et al.  Testing hydrometeor particle type discrimination derived from CloudSat and CALIPSO , 2017 .

[55]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Vertical cloud properties in the tropical western Pacific Ocean: Validation of the CCSR/NIES/FRCGC GCM by shipborne radar and lidar , 2008 .

[56]  G. Cesana,et al.  Evaluation of the cloud thermodynamic phase in a climate model using CALIPSO‐GOCCP , 2013 .