Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the potential of machine learning based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography (SWE), and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) radiomics for the localization of prostate cancer (PCa) lesions using transrectal ultrasound. Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board and comprised 50 men with biopsy-confirmed PCa that were referred for radical prostatectomy. Prior to surgery, patients received transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), SWE, and DCE-US for three imaging planes. The images were automatically segmented and registered. First, model-based features related to contrast perfusion and dispersion were extracted from the DCE-US videos. Subsequently, radiomics were retrieved from all modalities. Machine learning was applied through a random forest classification algorithm, using the co-registered histopathology from the radical prostatectomy specimens as a reference to draw benign and malignant regions of interest. To avoid overfitting, the performance of the multiparametric classifier was assessed through leave-one-patient-out cross-validation. Results The multiparametric classifier reached a region-wise area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.75 and 0.90 for PCa and Gleason > 3 + 4 significant PCa, respectively, thereby outperforming the best-performing single parameter (i.e., contrast velocity) yielding ROC-AUCs of 0.69 and 0.76, respectively. Machine learning revealed that combinations between perfusion-, dispersion-, and elasticity-related features were favored. Conclusions In this paper, technical feasibility of multiparametric machine learning to improve upon single US modalities for the localization of PCa has been demonstrated. Extended datasets for training and testing may establish the clinical value of automatic multiparametric US classification in the early diagnosis of PCa. Key Points • Combination of B-mode ultrasound, shear-wave elastography, and contrast ultrasound radiomics through machine learning is technically feasible. • Multiparametric ultrasound demonstrated a higher prostate cancer localization ability than single ultrasound modalities. • Computer-aided multiparametric ultrasound could help clinicians in biopsy targeting.

[1]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[2]  C. Sweep,et al.  Elements regulating angiogenesis and correlative microvessel density in benign hyperplastic and malignant prostate tissue , 2003, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[3]  Jie Tang,et al.  Diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced ultrasound in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[4]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Entropy of Ultrasound-Contrast-Agent Velocity Fields for Angiogenesis Imaging in Prostate Cancer , 2017, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  A S Whittemore,et al.  Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[6]  John A. Hossack,et al.  Ultrasound in Radiology: From Anatomic, Functional, Molecular Imaging to Drug Delivery and Image-Guided Therapy , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[7]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Correspondence - Spatiotemporal correlation of ultrasound contrast agent dilution curves for angiogenesis localization by dispersion imaging , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[8]  G. Salomon,et al.  Multiparametric ultrasound: evaluation of greyscale, shear wave elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for prostate cancer detection and localization in correlation to radical prostatectomy specimens , 2018, BMC Urology.

[9]  V. Laudone,et al.  Angiogenesis and prostate cancer: in vivo and in vitro expression of angiogenesis factors by prostate cancer cells. , 1998, Urology.

[10]  J. Cho,et al.  Shear-Wave Elastography for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  S. Yen,et al.  Medical castration with megestrol acetate and minidose of diethylstilbestrol. , 1981, Urology.

[12]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  E. Halpern,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. , 2006, Reviews in urology.

[14]  Yi Guo,et al.  Radiomics Analysis on Ultrasound for Prediction of Biologic Behavior in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma , 2017, Clinical breast cancer.

[15]  M. Mischi,et al.  The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients , 2017, BMC Urology.

[16]  Libertario Demi,et al.  Three-dimensional histopathological reconstruction as a reliable ground truth for prostate cancer studies , 2017 .

[17]  M. Mischi,et al.  Angiogenesis imaging by spatiotemporal analysis of ultrasound contrast agent dispersion kinetics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  Rebecca L. Siegel Mph,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018 .

[19]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[20]  M. Parmar,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confi rmatory study , 2018 .

[21]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Multifocal prostate cancer: biologic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. , 2010, Human pathology.

[22]  D. Margolis,et al.  PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. , 2016, European urology.

[23]  P. Vermeulen,et al.  Development and Validation of a Histological Method to Measure Microvessel Density in Whole-Slide Images of Cancer Tissue , 2016, PloS one.

[24]  F. Frauscher,et al.  Contrast-enhanced US of the prostate with Sonazoid: comparison with whole-mount prostatectomy specimens in 12 patients. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  J. Bamber,et al.  Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography of the Normal Prostate: Interobserver Reproducibility and Comparison with Functional Magnetic Resonance Tissue Characteristics , 2018, Ultrasonic imaging.

[26]  Pierre Geurts,et al.  Supervised learning with decision tree-based methods in computational and systems biology. , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[27]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review , 2015, World Journal of Urology.

[28]  Yair Lotan,et al.  Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. , 2013, European urology.

[29]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Viscoelasticity Mapping by Identification of Local Shear Wave Dynamics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[30]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. , 2017, European urology.

[31]  Jing Ma,et al.  Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3? , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer , 2007, Current opinion in urology.

[33]  M. Mischi,et al.  Contrast-ultrasound dispersion imaging for prostate cancer localization by improved spatiotemporal similarity analysis. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  Rodolfo Montironi,et al.  Contemporary Role of Systematic Prostate Biopsies: Indications, Techniques, and Implications for Patient Care , 2013 .

[35]  N. Salem,et al.  Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[36]  Christophe K. Mannaerts,et al.  Deep Learning for Real-time, Automatic, and Scanner-adapted Prostate (Zone) Segmentation of Transrectal Ultrasound, for Example, Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy. , 2019, European urology focus.

[37]  Raymond H Mak,et al.  Radiomic phenotype features predict pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[38]  Markus Graefen,et al.  Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[39]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Radiomics and radiogenomics of prostate cancer , 2018, Abdominal Radiology.

[40]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[41]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Contrast-Ultrasound Diffusion Imaging for Localization of Prostate Cancer , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[42]  Christophe K. Mannaerts,et al.  Accurate validation of ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer: a review of challenges in registration of imaging and histopathology , 2018, Journal of Ultrasound.

[43]  Accuracy of shear wave elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[44]  O. Hélénon,et al.  Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: state of the art. , 2013, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[45]  Yoshinobu Sato,et al.  Novel application of three-dimensional shear wave elastography in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. , 2018, Biomedical reports.

[46]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Intra‐ and interreader reproducibility of PI‐RADSv2: A multireader study , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[47]  D. Rubens,et al.  Tissue elasticity properties as biomarkers for prostate cancer. , 2008, Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers.

[48]  Rémi Souchon,et al.  Stiffness of benign and malignant prostate tissue measured by shear-wave elastography: a preliminary study , 2017, European Radiology.

[49]  R.R. Wildeboer,et al.  Zonal Segmentation in Transrectal Ultrasound Images of the Prostate Through Deep Learning , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[50]  Reinhold Muller,et al.  Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound for Quantification of Tissue Perfusion , 2015, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[51]  Brian Wodlinger,et al.  High-Frequency Quantitative Ultrasound for Imaging Prostate Cancer Using a Novel Micro-Ultrasound Scanner. , 2018, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[52]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Radiomic Analysis Reveals Prognostic Information in T1-Weighted Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Glioblastoma , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[53]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Ultrasound‐contrast‐agent dispersion and velocity imaging for prostate cancer localization , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[54]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  3-D Quantitative Dynamic Contrast Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Localization. , 2018, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[55]  M. Fay,et al.  Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules. , 2010, Statistics surveys.

[56]  A. Gavin,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. , 2018, European journal of cancer.

[57]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Machine learning and radiology , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[58]  T. Helbich,et al.  Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound: Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions , 2019, Investigative radiology.

[59]  M. Mischi,et al.  Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer , 2016, European Radiology.

[60]  J. Sandhu Prostate cancer and chronic prostatitis , 2007 .