Early Full Range of Shoulder and Elbow Motion is Possible After Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Humeral Shaft Fractures

Objectives: To measure the speed of full shoulder and elbow range of motion recovery following minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for humeral shaft fractures. Setting: University Hospital. Patients: From March 2005 to July 2007, 14 consecutive patients with closed humeral shaft fractures underwent surgery by a single surgeon. Intervention: The MIPO technique involved proximal delto-bicipital incision and distal brachialis-splitting incision. A narrow locking 4.5/5.0-mm compression plate was applied percutaneously on the anterior surface of the humerus. Main Outcome Measurements: The intervals between operation date and the day when range of motion recovered to normal in the shoulder and elbow joint. Results: Median time to normal motion recovery was 19 days in the shoulder, and 60 days in the elbow. Conclusions: MIPO is a promising option for humeral shaft fractures because of the early recovery of motion in adjacent joints. Elbow function requires longer recovery time than the shoulder, and this may be due to the distal approach.

[1]  S. Din,et al.  Early Operative Treatment of Radial Nerve Palsy Complicating Fracture of the Shaft of the Humerus , 2011 .

[2]  H. Peiyan,et al.  Minimally Invasive Plating Osteosynthesis (MIPO) of Middle and Distal Third Humeral Shaft Fractures , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[3]  W. Pospula,et al.  Percutaneous Fixation of Comminuted Fractures of the Humerus: Initial Experience at Al Razi Hospital, Kuwait , 2006, Medical Principles and Practice.

[4]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures—a meta-analysis , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.

[5]  T. Apivatthakakul,et al.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture. Is it possible? A cadaveric study and preliminary report. , 2005, Injury.

[6]  J. McElwain,et al.  Plating of humeral shaft fractures--has the pendulum swung back? , 2004, Injury.

[7]  W. Belangero,et al.  Bridging plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures. , 2004, Injury.

[8]  A. Sarmiento.  Thoughts on the impact of technology on orthopaedics. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  G. Zych,et al.  Functional Bracing for the Treatment of Fractures of the Humeral Diaphysis* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R. Buckley,et al.  Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomised trial. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  J. Chapman,et al.  Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  P. Rommens,et al.  [Retrograde nailing of humerus shaft fractures with the unreamed humerus nail. An international multicenter study]. , 1998, Der Unfallchirurg.

[13]  P. Rommens,et al.  Retrograde nailing of humeral shaft fractures with the UHN. An international multicenter survey , 1998, Der Unfallchirurg.

[14]  A. M. Ingman,et al.  Locked intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Implant design, surgical technique, and clinical results. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  Charles A. Rockwood,et al.  Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults , 1991 .